Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 38
Filter
1.
Res Dev Disabil ; 150: 104748, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744072

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ) has been used to screen children who probably have developmental coordination disorder (DCD). AIMS: We systematically reviewed studies on the predictive validity of the DCDQ and performed a meta-analysis on its diagnostic accuracy. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Literature was searched through four electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycArticles. A total of 27 studies was selected based on the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the DCDQ were assessed using summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the DCDQ type, reference standard, and participant type. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Overall, the DCDQ has a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.77, showing moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve, 0.80). Subgroup analysis showed that the revised version of the DCDQ had higher diagnostic accuracy than the original version. When the reference standard was the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the sensitivity and specificity of the DCDQ were 0.87 and 0.83, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was higher in clinical samples compared to the general population. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrated that the DCDQ has adequate diagnostic accuracy, suggesting it can help screen children with motor skill deficits.


Subject(s)
Motor Skills Disorders , Sensitivity and Specificity , Child , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Motor Skills Disorders/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , ROC Curve , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards
2.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 148: 104607, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Home visits have often been performed for diabetes management, but with the increased use of the internet and smartphones, people are opting for telenursing as the main method for monitoring and controlling diabetes. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the effects of home visits and telenursing on diabetes management. METHODS: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were used as data sources. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar, and two-hour post-prandial glucose levels were used as outcome measures. A subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of diabetes and follow-up. RESULTS: Of 1890 studies, 24 (2801 participants) were selected and meta-analyzed. The nursing interventions provided during nursing visits or telenursing mainly included education on diabetes and blood sugar control. It was seen that HbA1c decreased with a weighted mean difference of -0.66 (95 % confidence interval -0.82 to -0.51, p < .001) % in home visits and -0.56 (95 % confidence interval -0.81 to -0.31, p < .001) % in telenursing. The fasting blood sugar reported only in telenursing was reduced by a weighted mean difference of -14.23 (95 % confidence interval 27.59 to -0.88, p = .04) mg/dL and two-hour post-prandial glucose was reduced with a mean difference of -15.84 (95 % confidence interval -24.45 to -7.24, p = .003) mg/dL. Furthermore, low heterogeneity was found among the studies. In a subgroup analysis of diabetes type, HbA1c in home visits was reduced by -0.86 % in type 1 diabetes and -0.62 % in type 2 diabetes, while in telenursing, the reductions were -0.65 % and -0.53 %, respectively. Fasting blood glucose was reduced by -6.08 mg/dL and -18.50 mg/dL, respectively, whereas two-hour postprandial blood sugar was reduced by -14.49 mg/dL and -30.30 mg/dL, respectively, in telenursing. In the subgroup analysis of the follow-up period, HbA1c during home visits decreased by -0.63 % at 10 to 16 weeks, -0.73 % at 24 to 36 weeks, and -0.64 % at 52 weeks or more, while in telenursing, the reductions were -0.80 %, -0.44 %, and -0.07 %, respectively. Home visits were not statistically significant between 10 and 16 weeks, whereas telenursing was not significant at 52 weeks or more. CONCLUSIONS: Despite telenursing reducing HbA1c slightly less than home visits, evidence from this systematic review suggests that telenursing is a similarly effective approach for controlling blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes. Telenursing is a nursing intervention that can be used as an alternative to home visits for patients requiring diabetes management.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Telenursing , Humans , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin , House Calls , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Res Gerontol Nurs ; 16(6): 312-320, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37616483

ABSTRACT

The current systematic review compared whether combined exercise and nutrition interventions are effective in preventing or improving sarcopenia in frail older adults and healthy older adults. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for randomized controlled trials. Of the 1,596 citations, 22 trials (N = 1,767) were included in the final sample. In frail older adults, significant improvement after combined exercise and nutrition interventions was observed in seven indicators: skeletal muscle index, 0.16 kg/m2; handgrip, 1.41 kg; knee extension strength, 0.24 Nm; five-repetition chair-stand test, -1.89 sec; gait speed, 0.06 m/s; Short Physical Performance Battery, 0.43; and Timed Up and Go test, -0.56 sec. In healthy older adults, two indicators improved and showed statistically significant differences: handgrip, 2.15 kg; and 6-Minute Walking Test, 9.71 m. Combined exercise and nutritional interventions can improve skeletal muscle quality, strength, and physical performance in frail and healthy older adults. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 16(6), 312-320.].


Subject(s)
Sarcopenia , Humans , Aged , Sarcopenia/prevention & control , Muscle Strength/physiology , Hand Strength , Frail Elderly , Postural Balance , Time and Motion Studies
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37354303

ABSTRACT

This study is an updated systematic review verifying whether the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a valuable screening tool for children and adolescents. Electronic searches were performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycArticles, using depression and CES-D as keywords. Fourteen studies that included 7,843 children and adolescents were analyzed. In the meta-analysis by CES-D type, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for the long version were 0.81 and 0.72, respectively; they were 0.80 and 0.74 for the short version, respectively. The summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves were 0.83 and 0.86, respectively. Compared to the CES-D and other tools, the pooled sensitivity (0.84 vs. 0.83) and the pooled specificity (0.72 vs. 0.74) were similar, and the sROC curve was the same at 0.83. This review indicates that the CES-D is an available and valuable tool for screening depression in children and adolescents.

5.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 307(5): 1331-1345, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35416478

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the predictive validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and other tools for screening depression in pregnant and postpartum women through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycArticles databases was conducted using the following keywords: depression, perinatal-related terms, and EPDS. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to assess the risk of bias in diagnostic studies. RESULTS: The search identified 823 articles, of which 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. In 1831 pregnant women from nine studies, pooled sensitivity and specificity of the EPDS were 0.81 and 0.87, respectively, with summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve of 0.90. In 515 postpartum women from six studies, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and sROC were 0.79, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively. We then compared the EPDS with other tools using three or more studies. The sROC curve of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was 0.74, which was lower than that (0.86) of the EPDS. The sROC curve of the Beck Depression Inventory and the ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale was 0.91, similar to that of the EPDS (0.90 and 0.87). However, in comparison with the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale (0.98), the sROC curve of the EPDS was 0.54. CONCLUSION: As a tool specialized for screening depression in pregnant and postpartum women, the EPDS showed excellent performance. Thus, the EPDS can be used in preference to other tools to screen for depression in perinatal women at a primary care setting or a midwifery center.


Subject(s)
Depression, Postpartum , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Depression, Postpartum/diagnosis , Depression, Postpartum/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Postpartum Period , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
6.
Mech Ageing Dev ; 210: 111773, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36529259

ABSTRACT

This systematic review aims, however, to determine which intervention is more effective. The skeletal muscle index (SMI), handgrip, and gait speed were used as indicators of improvement, and these effects were compared across six subgroups: combined intervention versus exercise; nutrition or control group; exercise versus nutrition; and exercise or nutrition versus control group. Out of 1596 articles, 32 studies (3063 older adults) were selected and meta-analyzed. Comparing the combined intervention with a control group, the WMD was 0.20 kg/m2, 1.56 kg, and 0.08 m/s for SMI, handgrip, and gait speed, respectively, all of which showed a statistically significant improvement. When a combined intervention was compared with exercise and nutrition, the former resulted in improvements in handgrip (WMD 0.38 kg) and gait speed (WMD 0.12 m/s). On comparing exercise and nutrition, there was an improvement in gait speed (0.12 m/s) with exercise alone. On comparing exercise with a control group, only handgrip (WMD 1.74 kg) and gait speed (WMD 0.11 m/s) showed improvement, whereas in the nutrition versus the control group, only the handgrip (WMD 0.90 kg) improved. Although exercise and nutritional therapy together demonstrated improved muscle strength, exercise is recommended for the improvement of physical performance.


Subject(s)
Sarcopenia , Humans , Aged , Sarcopenia/therapy , Hand Strength , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Muscle Strength , Exercise/physiology
7.
Brain Impair ; 24(2): 412-423, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167187

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Dementia, a slowly progressive disease, is poorly diagnosed. One reason is that it is difficult to use the screening tools. The six-item cognitive impairment test (6-CIT) is brief, with six items, and has a confirmed scoring system that can easily be used by an average individual. This review aimed to analyze the predictive validity of the 6-CIT including comparisons with other tools such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). METHODS: Literature searches were performed on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycArticles using the dementia and 6-CITas keywords. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was applied to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: Seven studies with 6,831 participants that met the selection criteria were included. The pooled sensitivity of the 6-CIT analyzed in seven studies was 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.89), the pooled specificity was 0.87, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was 0.90 (SE = 0.04). The diagnostic performance of the 6-CIT and MMSE was compared in three studies. The pooled sensitivity of the 6-CIT was 0.85, the pooled specificity was 0.91, and the sROC curve was 0.91, whereas the MMSE values were 0.70, 0.93, and 0.68, respectively. CONCLUSION: This review presents evidence that the 6-CIT has excellent dementia screening performance and could be used as a potential alternative to the MMSE. The 6-CIT may provide an opportunity for early detection of dementia.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction , Dementia , Humans , Dementia/diagnosis , ROC Curve , Neurologic Examination , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis
8.
Iran J Public Health ; 51(8): 1827-1835, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249117

ABSTRACT

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), a chronic disease, is associated with obesity and inflammation. This study investigated the effects of body mass index (BMI), leukocytes, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) on type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Korean adults. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from 5,420 adults' subject in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VII-3, 2018) was performed. The collected data were analyzed by n (%), mean ± SD, t-test, χ2 -test, and multiple logistic regression methods. Results: BMI and leukocytes count were higher in the T2DM-diagnosed group. The probability of T2DM increased by 4.76 times for obesity compared to normal weight, but high obesity was not an influencing factor for T2DM. As the leukocytes increased, the probability of T2DM increased by 1.15 times. However, hs-CRP was not an influencing factor for T2DM. Age was higher in the T2DM-diagnosed group and appeared to be an influencing factor in T2DM. Conclusion: Obesity and inflammation indicators, including WBC, appeared to be risk factors for T2DM. This study presented the basis of diet and exercise interventions for weight loss and white blood cell count in a T2DM prevention and management program.

9.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 72: 103147, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533539

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Depression in older adults is a major disorder that can be triggering, exacerbating, or co-occurring with dementia symptoms. AIM: This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), a depression screening tool developed for older adults. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases using the following keywords: dementia, depression, and CSDD. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity of the CSDD and the GDS was 0.89 and 0.82, the pooled specificity was 0.88 and 0.85, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.94 and 0.91, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the CSDD had the highest accuracy in the pooled sensitivity of 0.91, the pooled specificity of 0.87, and the sROC curve of 0.95 in the dementia group, and the GDS was the best in the non-dementia group at 0.88, 0.82, and 0.93, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CSDD showed high diagnostic accuracy in older adults with dementia, and the GDS in older adults without dementia.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Depression , Aged , Dementia/complications , Dementia/diagnosis , Depression/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sensitivity and Specificity
10.
Curr Alzheimer Res ; 19(3): 202-211, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35379127

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are screened to distinguish whether the cognitive decline in older adults is attributed to pathological causes rather than normal aging. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to analyze the diagnostic performance of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in screening for MCI and AD. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycArticles databases using the following keywords: dementia and ADAS-Cog. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to check the risk of bias in the diagnostic studies. RESULTS: We reviewed 14 studies, including 3,875 patients who met the selection criteria. In 2,624 MCI patients from nine studies, the pooled sensitivity of ADAS-Cog was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.88), the pooled specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90), and the area under the curve of summary receiver-operating characteristic curves (SROC AUC) was 0.89 (SE = 0.03). In 2,517 AD patients from 10 studies, the pooled sensitivity and pooled specificity were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.95), respectively, and the sROC AUC was 0.97 (SE = 0.01). Although sub-analyzed according to age and years of education, there was no significant difference in the predictive validity of the ADAS-Cog. CONCLUSION: The ADAS-Cog has high predictive validity as a screening tool in both MCI and AD and has better diagnostic performance in patients with AD. When early screening for AD is desired, ADAS-Cog is a first-stage screening tool that can be initially employed.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Cognitive Dysfunction , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Cognition , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Humans , Neuropsychological Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Psychiatry Res ; 310: 114445, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35190341

ABSTRACT

This review analyzes the predictive validity of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), considering cognitive function. Electronic searches were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. Overall, 20 studies were reviewed, including 3,499 older adults, with and without dementia, who satisfied the selection criteria. Participants were stratified into the dementia, non-dementia, and mixed groups, and the diagnostic performance of the CSDD was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In the dementia and non-dementia groups, the area under the curve was ≥ 0.9, confirming high accuracy of the test. The pooled sensitivity was the highest in the dementia group (0.87), followed by the mixed group (0.84) and non-dementia group (0.82). In the subgroup analysis based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the ROC curve was 0.90 for older adults with MMSE scores < 15 and 0.87 for those with an MMSE score ≥ 15. Therefore, the CSDD can be considered excellent tool for assessing depression in all older adults, although its predictive ability is better for older adults with dementia compared to that in those without dementia. It can be used as a first-line screening tool for depression, regardless of cognitive function.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Aged , Dementia/complications , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Humans , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Health Care Women Int ; 43(10-11): 1158-1180, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33825676

ABSTRACT

This study confirms the effectiveness of aerobic exercise on waist circumference, Vo2 max, blood glucose, insulin, serum lipid in middle-aged women. The Ovid-Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched. The risk of bias 2 revised in 2019 was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Selected studies were meta-analyzed with Review Manager 5.3. Data were compiled from 15 RCTs comprising 1,110 participants. Overall, aerobic exercise reduced waist circumference and blood glucose, and increased VO2 max significantly. We recommend the application of aerobic exercise to prevent metabolic disease in middle-aged women.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose , Insulin , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Exercise , Lipids , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Waist Circumference
14.
Psychiatry Res ; 302: 114037, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098160

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes the performance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to screen for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults. We divided adults into three groups such as community-indwelling adults, patients with chronic diseases, and psychiatric patients. Electronic searches were performed on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO database using the following keywords: depression, depressive disorder, major, and CES-D scale. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was applied to assess the risk of bias in diagnostic studies. We reviewed 33 studies, including 18,271 adults that met the selection criteria. In meta-analysis, the pooled sensitivity was 0.86 on community-indwelling adults, 0.85 on patients with chronic diseases and 0.85 on psychiatric patients. The pooled specificity was 0.74, 0.84, and 0.88, respectively, and the summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were 0.88, 0.91, and 0.93, respectively. The RE correlation was a negative value (-0.394) only in patients with chronic diseases, showing no heterogeneity between studies. The CES-D, which has shown high diagnostic accuracy in adults, can be recommended for use as a first-stage screener for MDD. As a result, the early application of the CES-D can lead to disease prevention in adults at risk for depression.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Epidemiologic Studies , Humans , Mass Screening , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
J Affect Disord ; 292: 454-463, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34144371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the predictive validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale for late-life depression (LLD) over the age of 50 years and identified the usefulness of the CES-D compared with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). METHODS: Electronic searches were performed on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases using the following keywords: depression, depressive disorder, major, and the CES-D scale. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was applied to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: We reviewed 22 studies, including 27,742 older adults aged 50+ years that met the selection criteria. In the meta-analysis, the pooled sensitivity was 0.81 in the CES-D long version and 0.76 in the short version. The sROC AUC was 0.89 (SE=0.01) for the long version and 0.88 (SE=0.04) for the short version. The GDS was only compared to the CES-D long version. The pooled sensitivity was as follows: the CES-D, 0.82; the GDS long version, 0.86; and the GDS short version, 0.87. Further, there was no heterogeneity of 0.0% between studies. The pooled specificity was 0.78 and 0.77, respectively, and the sROC AUC was 0.88 for the CES-D (SE=0.02), 0.89 for the GDS long version (SE=0.04), and 0.91 for the GDS short version (SE=0.03). LIMITATIONS: We could not consider cognitive function of older adults. CONCLUSIONS: The CES-D showed similar predictive validity compared to the GDS developed in older adults. The CES-D is a useful tool that can be used for LLD screening in older adults over 50 years old.


Subject(s)
Depression , Mass Screening , Aged , Cognition , Epidemiologic Studies , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Reproducibility of Results , Research , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Biol Res Nurs ; 23(4): 658-675, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A systematic review was performed to identify the types of physical activities effective as interventions in preventing metabolic syndrome in middle-aged women. METHODS: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) served as the data sources. Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 was applied to assess the risk of bias of the randomized controlled trials. Meta-analyses were performed on selected studies using Review Manager 5.3. Thirty-one trials enrolling 2,202 participants were included. RESULTS: Compared to controls, the effects of physical activity were indicated by pooled mean differences, which were -0.57 kg for body weight, -0.43 kg/m2 for body mass index, -1.63 cm for waist circumference, -4.89 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (BP), and -2.71 mmHg for diastolic BP. The effects were greater on the measurements of waist circumference and BP than on body weight and BMI. The types of physical activities were further analyzed according to sub-groups. Only aerobic exercise did not affect body weight and resistance exercise did not significantly change any results. Contrarily, combined exercises significantly reduced measurements of waist circumference and BP. CONCLUSION: This review can provide valuable information for research and implementation of measures to prevent metabolic syndrome in middle-aged women.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Obesity , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Obesity/prevention & control , Waist Circumference
17.
Clin Gerontol ; 44(2): 83-96, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33164674

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the predictive validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) for screening depression in older adults aged over 65 years. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO database using the following keywords: depression, depressive disorder, major, geriatric depression scale, and geriatric depression scale short. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was applied to assess the risk of bias in diagnostic studies. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies that included 8,897 older adults were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity of the GDS-15 was 0.80 (95% CI:0.78 to 0.82), its pooled specificity was 0.79 (95% CI:0.78 to 0.80), the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 (SE = 0.01) and the Q* value was 0.82 (SE = 0.01). The subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the GDS-15 were higher in older adults with normal cognitive function than in those with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: These finding suggest that the GDS-15 may be more accurate for screening depression in older adults with normal cognitive function. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The utility the GDS-15 may be restricted because its diagnostic accuracy is slightly lower among older adults with cognitive impairment.


Subject(s)
Depression , Geriatric Assessment , Aged , Depression/diagnosis , Humans , Mass Screening , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Blood Press Monit ; 25(1): 2-12, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31714346

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify whether automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor (AOBPM) is a reliable blood pressure (BP) measurement tool in geriatric patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with high variability in BP and to evaluate whether it can be applied in practice. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL by using the following keywords: 'atrial fibrillation,' 'atrial flutter, 'blood pressure monitor', 'sphygmomanometer.' The QUADAS-2 was applied to assess the internal validity of selected studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 program. DESIGN: Systematic review. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies, including 938 geriatric patients with AF. We compared with the previously used BP measurement method (mainly office) and AOBPM, and the patients with AF were divided into the AF-AF (atrial fibrillation rhythm continued) and AF-SR groups (sinus rhythm recovered). The difference in the systolic BP was -3.0 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): -6.58 to 0.59] and -1.62 (95% CI: -6.08 to 2.84) mmHg in the AF-AF and AF-SR groups, respectively. The difference in the diastolic BP was 0.17 (95% CI: -2.90 to 3.25) mmHg and -0.23 (95% CI: -5.11 to 4.65) mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSION: This review showed that the BP difference from AOBPM compared with the auscultatory BP method was less than 5 mmHg in the elderly with AF. This difference is acceptable in clinical practice. However, AOBPM compared with invasive arterial BP in the diastolic BP was a difference of 5 mmHg or more, and so its accuracy cannot be assured.


Subject(s)
Arterial Pressure , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Blood Pressure Monitors/standards , Oscillometry/instrumentation , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
19.
Blood Press Monit ; 24(6): 265-276, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31658107

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A mercury sphygmomanometer has been considered a gold standard for measuring blood pressure. However, by the Minamata Convention on Mercury, the traditional mercury sphygmomanometer is being replaced by an automated oscillometric device. This study aimed to provide scientific evidence to determine whether an automated oscillometric device can replace a mercury sphygmomanometer and if it is applicable in routine practice. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched on 4 May 2018. Studies comparing blood pressure measurements between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers were included. Study characteristics were abstracted using the evidence table, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Data were compiled from 24 studies comprising 47 759 subjects. The results of meta-analysis showed that automated oscillometric devices measured lower than mercury sphygmomanometers for both systolic blood pressure (mean differences -1.75 mmHg, 95% confidence intervals: -3.05 to -0.45, I = 91.0%) and diastolic blood pressure (mean differences -1.20 mmHg, 95% confidence intervals: -2.16 to -0.24, I = 95.0%). In sub-group analyses by manufacturer, BpTRU measured lower than the mercury sphygmomanometer and OMRON showed no difference compared to the mercury sphygmomanometer for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but the results differed depending on the devices. CONCLUSION: As a result of this review, the difference in blood pressure between the mercury sphygmomanometer and the automated oscillometric device was within 5 mmHg, but the heterogeneity between the studies was very high. The automated oscillometric devices showed differences in blood pressure results according to the manufacturer and product type.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination , Blood Pressure , Oscillometry , Blood Pressure Determination/instrumentation , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Mercury/analysis , Oscillometry/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Sphygmomanometers
20.
Nutr Res Pract ; 13(5): 399-409, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31583059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to provide scientific evidence on the effectiveness of worksite-based dietary intervention to reduce obesity among overweight/obese employees. MATERIALS/METHODS: Electronic search was performed using Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. The keywords used were "obesity," "nutrition therapy," and "worksite." The internal validity of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias. Meta-analysis of selected studies was performed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs with 2,854 participants were identified. The effectiveness of dietary interventions was analyzed in terms of changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, and blood pressure. The results showed that weight decreased with weighted mean difference (WMD) of -4.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): -6.54 to -2.20), but the effectiveness was statistically significant only in short-term programs < 6 months (P = 0.001). BMI also decreased with WMD of -1.26 (95% CI: -1.98 to -0.55), but the effectiveness was statistically significant only in short-term programs < 6 months (P = 0.001). Total cholesterol decreased with WMD of -5.57 (95% CI: -9.07 to -2.07) mg/dL, demonstrating significant effectiveness (P = 0.002). Both systolic (WMD: -4.90 mmHg) and diastolic (WMD: -2.88 mmHg) blood pressure decreased, demonstrating effectiveness, but with no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The worksite-based dietary interventions for overweight/obese employees showed modest short-term effects. These interventions can be considered successful because weight loss was below approximately 5-10 kg of the initial body weight, which is the threshold for the management of obesity recommended by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...