Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10347, 2024 05 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710892

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) undergoing definite chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). We included 87 patients with LS-SCLC from South Korea, treated between 2005 and 2019 with definite CRT. ALI was calculated using body mass index, serum albumin, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. We categorized 38 patients into the high ALI group (ALI ≥ 44.3) and 48 into the low ALI group (ALI < 44.3). Patients in the high ALI group exhibited longer overall survival (OS) than patients in the low ALI group. In multivariate analysis, prophylactic cranial irradiation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.366, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.66, P = 0.0008), and high ALI (HR = 0.475, 95% CI 0.27-0.84, P = 0.0103) were identified as independent prognostic factors for predicting better OS. Notably, a high ALI score was particularly indicative of longer survival in patients treated with the combination of etoposide and cisplatin. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a high pretreatment ALI was significantly associated with better OS in patients with LS-SCLC undergoing definite CRT. This suggests that ALI could be a useful tool for predicting prognosis and guiding chemotherapy regimen selections in clinical practice for LS-SCLC.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma , Humans , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/therapy , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/mortality , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy , Female , Male , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Middle Aged , Aged , Prognosis , Inflammation , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Etoposide/therapeutic use , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Staging , Neutrophils , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Adult , Clinical Relevance
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556045

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In adults with asthma, the long-term impact of previous coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on severe exacerbations and mortality is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term risk of severe exacerbation and mortality in adults with asthma who recovered from COVID-19. METHODS: Using the Korean National Health Insurance claim-based database, we compared the risk of severe exacerbations (emergency room visits or hospitalization) and mortality in adults with asthma aged greater than 20 years who had recovered from COVID-19 between October 8, 2020, and December 16, 2021 (COVID-19 cohort, n = 10,739) with 1:1 propensity score-matched controls (n = 10,739). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 87 days (range, 15-448 days), the incidence rate of severe exacerbations in the COVID-19 cohort and the matched cohort was 187.3 and 119.3 per 10,000 person-years, respectively. The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of severe exacerbation compared with the matched cohort (hazard ratio = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.06-2.32). During a median follow-up of 360 days (range, 15-721 days), the incidence rate of death in the COVID-19 and matched cohorts was 128.3 and 73.5 per 10,000 person-years, respectively. The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of death (hazard ratio = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.33-2.30) compared with the matched cohort. When further analyzed by COVID-19 severity, severe COVID-19 was associated with a 5.12-fold (95% CI, 3.27-8.01) and 7.31-fold (95% CI, 5.41-9.88) increased risk of severe exacerbation and death, respectively, but non-severe COVID-19 was not. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that severe COVID-19 is associated with an increased long-term risk of severe exacerbation and mortality among individuals with asthma.

3.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 11(1)2024 02 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346848

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Studies that comprehensively evaluate the association between physical activity (PA) levels, particularly by quantifying PA intensity, and healthcare use requiring emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalisation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited in Korea. METHODS: The risk of all-cause and respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation according to the presence or absence of COPD and the level of PA was evaluated in a retrospective nationwide cohort comprising 3308 subjects with COPD (COPD cohort) and 293 358 subjects without COPD (non-COPD cohort) from 2009 to 2017. RESULTS: The COPD group exhibited a higher relative risk of all-cause and respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation across all levels of PA compared with the highly active control group (≥1500 metabolic equivalents (METs)-min/week). Specifically, the highest risk was observed in the sedentary group (adjusted HR (aHR) (95% CI) = 1.70 (1.59 to 1.81) for all-cause ED visit or hospitalisation, 5.45 (4.86 to 6.12) for respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation). A 500 MET-min/week increase in PA was associated with reductions in all-cause and respiratory ED visit or hospitalisation in the COPD cohort (aHR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.88 to 0.96) for all-cause, 0.87 (0.82 to 0.93) for respiratory cause). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the presumed healthiest cohort, the control group with PA>1500 METs-min/week, the COPD group with reduced PA has a higher risk of ED visit or hospitalisation.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Hospitalization , Risk , Exercise
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(1): 120-132.e5, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37774780

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that respiratory virus infections may be associated with new-onset asthma. However, whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with an increased risk of new-onset asthma remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate whether recent COVID-19 increases the risk of new-onset asthma and whether COVID-19 vaccination could mitigate this risk. METHODS: We constructed 3 different study designs using the Korean National Health Insurance claim-based database: study 1: COVID-19-diagnosed subjects (COVID-19 cohort) and their matched controls; study 2: COVID-19-vaccinated subjects (vaccination cohort) and their matched controls; and study 3: vaccination cohort and their matched controls, excluding subjects diagnosed with COVID-19. RESULTS: In study 1, 1.6% of the COVID-19 cohort and 0.7% of the matched cohort developed new-onset asthma, with incidences of 31.28 and 14.55 per 1,000 person-years, respectively (P < .001). The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of new-onset asthma (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.14; 95% CI 1.88-2.45) than matched controls. In study 2, the vaccination cohort had a lower risk of new-onset asthma than the matched controls (aHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.76-0.89). However, among subjects without a COVID-19 diagnosis, COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with a reduced risk of new-onset asthma in study 3 (aHR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87-1.04). In subgroup analysis, the risk of new-onset asthma was significantly lower in fully vaccinated subjects and higher in older subjects and in those with diabetes mellitus than in their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 was associated with a higher incidence of new-onset asthma, which might be preventable by COVID-19 vaccination.


Subject(s)
Asthma , COVID-19 , Humans , Aged , Cohort Studies , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/etiology
5.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1233516, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37886356

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Air pollutants are increasingly recognized to affect long-term outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis. We aimed to figure out the association between air pollutants and the risk of healthcare utilization in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: Data for 1,029 subjects with bronchiectasis in Seoul were extracted. The air pollutants included particulate matter of 10 µm or less in diameter (PM10), particulate matter of 2.5 µm or less in diameter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The outcome was all-cause healthcare uses, defined as outpatient visit, emergency department visit, or hospitalization. The concentration-response curves between each air pollutant and relative risks for healthcare utilization were obtained. Results: There were significant correlations between air pollutant concentrations and the risk of healthcare utilization, particularly for PM10, NO2, SO2, and CO. This risk was observed even at concentrations below the recommended safe thresholds for the general population. The slopes for the association between PM10 and NO2 and the risk of healthcare use showed a logarithmic growth pattern, with the steepest increase up to 30 µg/m3 and 0.030 parts per million (ppm), respectively. The curves for SO2 and CO showed an inverted U-shaped pattern, with a peak at 0.0045 ppm and a slow upward curve, respectively. No specific trends were observed for PM2.5 and O3 and the risk of healthcare use. Discussion: Increased concentrations of PM10, NO2, SO2, and CO were associated with increased healthcare utilization in patients with bronchiectasis. For patients with bronchiectasis, there were no safety thresholds for those air pollutants, and even low levels of air pollutant exposure can negatively impact bronchiectasis outcomes.

7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(9): 2830-2838.e4, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178766

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association between allergic diseases and the risk of mycobacterial disease is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between allergic diseases and mycobacterial diseases. METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study of 3,838,680 individuals, without prior mycobacterial disease, who participated in the 2009 National Health Screening Exam. We evaluated the incidence of mycobacterial disease (tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacterial infection) in participants with allergic disease (asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic dermatitis) and those without allergic disease. We followed the cohort up until the date of mycobacterial disease diagnosis, follow-up loss, death, or December 2018. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 8.3 (interquartile range, 8.1-8.6) years, 0.6% of participants developed mycobacterial disease. The incidence of mycobacterial disease was significantly higher in those with allergic diseases than in those without allergic diseases (1.0 vs 0.7/1000 person-years; P < .001), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.10-1.17). Asthma (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.29-1.45) and allergic rhinitis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11) increased the hazard of mycobacterial disease, whereas atopic dermatitis did not. The association between allergic diseases and hazard of mycobacterial disease was more prominent in older (age ≥ 65 years, P for interaction = .012) and obese (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, P for interaction < .001) participants. CONCLUSION: Allergic diseases including asthma and allergic rhinitis were associated with an increased risk of mycobacterial disease, whereas atopic dermatitis was not.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Dermatitis, Atopic , Rhinitis, Allergic , Humans , Aged , Cohort Studies , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Asthma/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Incidence , Risk Factors
10.
Chest ; 163(2): 270-280, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36087796

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbidity of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) pulmonary disease (PD). Although GERD is associated with more symptoms and severe disease in patients with NTM PD, whether GERD is associated with an increased risk of NTM PD developing is unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does GERD influence the development of NTM PD? Are there any factors associated with an increased risk of NTM PD among patients with GERD? What is the impact of NTM PD on the health-care use of patients with GERD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National Sample Cohort between 2002 and 2015 were used. The incidence and risk of NTM PD were compared between patients with GERD (GERD cohort; n = 17,424) and patients matched for age, sex, type of insurance, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (matched cohort; n = 69,696). Using the GERD cohort, the factors associated with incident NTM PD also were evaluated. RESULTS: During a median follow-up duration of 5.1 years, the age- and sex-adjusted incidence of NTM PD was significantly higher in the GERD cohort (34.8 per 100,000 person-years [PY]) than in the matched cohort (10.5 per 100,000 PY; P < .001), with a subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) of 3.36 (95% CI, 2.10-5.37). Regarding risk factors associated with NTM PD, age of 60 years or older (adjusted HR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.58-8.07) and bronchiectasis (adjusted HR, 18.69; 95% CI, 6.68-52.28) were associated with an increased risk of incident NTM PD in the GERD cohort. Compared with patients with GERD who did not demonstrate NTM PD, those with NTM PD showed higher all-cause (13,321 PY vs 5,932 PY; P = .049) and respiratory disease-related (5,403 vs 801; P = .011) ED visits or hospitalizations. INTERPRETATION: GERD is associated with an increased incidence of NTM PD. Older age and bronchiectasis are risk factors for NTM PD in patients with GERD. NTM PD in patients with GERD is associated with increased health-care use.


Subject(s)
Bronchiectasis , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Lung Diseases , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Humans , Middle Aged , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Lung , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Bronchiectasis/epidemiology , Bronchiectasis/microbiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
11.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1295457, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38259763

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Previous studies suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could lead to pulmonary fibrosis, but the incidence of newly diagnosed interstitial lung disease (ILD) after COVID-19 is unclear. We aimed to determine whether COVID-19 increases the risk of newly diagnosed ILD and whether vaccination against COVID-19 can reduce this risk. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance claim-based database. Two study groups and propensity score (PS)-matched control groups were constructed: Study 1: participants diagnosed with COVID-19 (COVID-19 cohort) and their PS-matched controls; Study 2: COVID-19 vaccinated participants (vaccination cohort) and their PS-matched controls. Results: In Study 1, during a median 6 months of follow-up, 0.50% of the COVID-19 cohort (300/60,518) and 0.04% of controls (27/60,518) developed newly diagnosed ILD, with an incidence of 9.76 and 0.88 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. The COVID-19 cohort had a higher risk of ILD [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 11.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.42-16.32] than controls. In Study 2, the vaccination cohort had a lower risk of newly diagnosed ILD than controls (aHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.57). Conclusion: Using nationwide data, we demonstrated that COVID-19 was associated with a higher incidence rate of newly diagnosed ILD, but that this risk could be mitigated by COVID-19 vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/epidemiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Vaccination
12.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis ; 13: 20406223221123979, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36213169

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite the importance of influenza vaccination, its rates in subjects with asthma are suboptimal, especially in the young population. Methods: Among 72,843 adults aged ⩾18 years from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted between 2010 and 2019, 1643 with asthma were included. The yearly trends and factors associated with influenza vaccination were analyzed in subjects with asthma. In addition, stratified analyses were performed by age group (<65 versus ⩾65 years). Results: During the study period, the overall influenza vaccination rate among subjects with asthma fluctuated from 51.0% to 64.3%, with a consistently higher vaccination rate in elderly subjects than in young subjects. Among young subjects with asthma, factors positively associated with influenza vaccination were female sex [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11-2.49], current asthma being treated (aOR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.14-2.50), history of pulmonary tuberculosis (aOR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.04-3.87), and dyslipidemia (aOR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.05-3.30). However, unmarried subjects showed an inverse relationship (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.34-0.75). In elderly subjects, unmarried status (aOR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.29-0.94), being underweight (aOR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.09-0.97), and having a low income (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.18-0.97) were factors negatively associated with influenza vaccination. Conclusion: In the last 10 years, influenza vaccination rates have still been insufficient in subjects with asthma, particularly in young subjects. Considering the factors that are influencing the vaccination rates of young subjects, public policies to increase influenza vaccination rates in subjects with asthma need to be established urgently.

13.
Respir Res ; 23(1): 288, 2022 Oct 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36258193

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although cardiovascular comorbidities negatively impact survival in patients with bronchiectasis, there is limited evidence to recommend exercise in this population. We aimed to evaluate whether exercise habit changes are related to reduced cardiovascular disease risk and explore an optimal exercise amount. METHODS: This study identified 165,842 patients with newly diagnosed bronchiectasis during 2010-2016 who underwent two health examinations and were followed up until December 2020. The exposure was the change in weekly habits of moderate- or vigorous-intensity physical activity between the two examinations, classified into non-exercisers and exercisers (further classified into new exercisers, exercise dropouts, and exercise maintainers). The amount of exercise was measured using metabolic equivalents of task (MET). The outcome was the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. RESULTS: During a mean of 6.2 ± 2.1 follow-up years, 4,233 (2.6%) and 3,745 (2.3%) of patients with bronchiectasis had MI or stroke, respectively. Compared to non-exercisers, exercisers had a significantly lower risk of MI or stroke by 9-28% (p < 0.001 for both). Among exercisers, exercise maintainers showed the lowest risk of MI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.81) and stroke (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.82) compared to non-exercisers. Regarding exercise amount, a significant risk reduction was observed only in patients with bronchiectasis who exercised for ≥ 500 MET-min/wk. CONCLUSION: Exercise was associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients with bronchiectasis. In particular, the risk was lowest in exercise maintainers, and cardiovascular risk reduction was significant when exercising more than 500 MET-min/wk.


Subject(s)
Bronchiectasis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Stroke , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Bronchiectasis/diagnosis , Bronchiectasis/epidemiology , Incidence , Fibrosis , Risk Factors
14.
J Pers Med ; 12(10)2022 Sep 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36294730

ABSTRACT

Occupational exposures have been regarded as a risk factor for the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is little knowledge regarding the effect of occupational exposure on the treatment outcomes of COPD. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the question of whether occupational exposure can have a potential impact on COPD outcomes. Methods: Information regarding self-reported occupational exposure for 312 patients with COPD from the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD) Cohort were included. A comparison of the rate of acute exacerbation, annual lung function change, and quality of life according to the presence or absence of occupational exposure was performed. Results: Seventy-six patients (24.4%) had experienced occupational exposure; chemical materials were most common. At enrollment, a higher COPD-specific version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire total score (39.7 ± 18.8 vs. 33.1 ± 17.6, p = 0.005) and a higher exacerbation history in the past year (30.3% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.017) were observed for patients with occupational exposure compared to those without occupational exposure. Furthermore, in the follow-up period, after adjusting for potential confounders, a higher frequency of acute exacerbation (odd ratio, 1.418; 95% confidence interval, 1.027-1.956; p = 0.033) and a more rapid decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (p = 0.009) was observed for COPD patients with occupational exposure compared to those without occupational exposure. Conclusions: In the KOLD cohort, worse outcomes in terms of exacerbation rate and change in lung function were observed for COPD patients with occupational exposure compared to those without occupational exposure. These findings suggest that occupational exposure not only is a risk factor for COPD but also might have a prognostic impact on COPD.

15.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(11)2022 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35681584

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis have an increased risk of lung cancer, followed by higher mortality in this population. Because the risk factors of lung cancer have not been well identified, this study aimed to investigate the risk factors of lung cancer in individuals with newly diagnosed bronchiectasis. METHODS: This cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database identified 7425 individuals with incident bronchiectasis among those who participated in the health screening exam in 2009. The cohort was followed from baseline to the date of incident: lung cancer, death, or until the end of the study period. We investigated the risk factors of lung cancer in participants with bronchiectasis using the Cox-proportional hazard models. RESULTS: During median 8.3 years of follow-up duration, 1.9% (138/7425) developed lung cancer. In multivariable analyses, significant factors associated with increased risk of incident lung cancer included: males (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.17-5.79) than females, the overweight (adjusted HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.03-2.35) than the normal weight, current smokers (adjusted HR = 3.10, 95% CI = 2.00-4.79) than never smokers, participants living in the rural area (adjusted HR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.68-3.85) than those living in the metropolitan area. Among comorbidities, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (adjusted HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.01-2.13) in participants with bronchiectasis. In contrast, mild alcohol consumption was associated with reduced risk of lung cancer (adjusted HR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.29-0.74) in those with bronchiectasis. CONCLUSION: This Korean population-based study showed that males, current smoking, overweight, living in rural areas, and comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with increased risk of lung cancer in individuals with bronchiectasis.

16.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 8105, 2022 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577832

ABSTRACT

Asthmatic patients are generally considered to have an increased risk of mortality compared with subjects without asthma. However, this issue has been less evaluated using nationally representative data. Moreover, it is unclear whether respiratory comorbidities other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with increased mortality in asthmatic patients compared with subjects without. Using a nationally representative sample database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with asthma and age-sex-matched control cohort. We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and stratified the asthma cohort based on respiratory comorbidities. During a median 8.9-year follow-up, the overall mortality rate was higher in the asthma cohort than in the control cohort (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for overall mortality in the asthma cohort compared with the control cohort was 1.13. The effects of asthma on overall mortality were more evident in males, patients under medical aid, and subjects with COPD. Respiratory comorbidities were significantly associated with increased risk of overall mortality in asthmatic patients compared with controls (adjusted HRs; 1.48 for COPD, 1.40 for bronchiectasis, 4.08 for lung cancer, and 1.59 for pneumonia). While asthma and lung cancer showed an additive effect only on overall mortality, asthma and other respiratory comorbidities (COPD, pneumonia, and bronchiectasis) had additive effects only on respiratory mortality. Patients with asthma had a higher overall mortality rate compared with subjects without asthma. Respiratory comorbidities showed an additive effect on overall or respiratory mortality in patients with asthma.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Bronchiectasis , Lung Neoplasms , Pneumonia , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Asthma/complications , Asthma/epidemiology , Bronchiectasis/complications , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Pneumonia/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
17.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 19(9): 1551-1560, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533306

ABSTRACT

Rationale: It remains unclear whether non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis increases the risk of lung cancer, because smoking history was not considered in previous studies. Objectives: To evaluate whether participants with bronchiectasis have a higher risk of incident lung cancer than those without bronchiectasis with information on smoking status. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study of 3,858,422 individuals who participated in the 2009 National Health Screening Program. We evaluated the incidence of lung cancer in participants with bronchiectasis (n = 65,305) and those without bronchiectasis (n = 3,793,117). We followed the cohort up until the date of lung cancer diagnosis, date of death, or December 2018. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the relative risk of lung cancer between participants with bronchiectasis and those without bronchiectasis. Results: The incidence of lung cancer in participants with bronchiectasis was significantly higher than in those without bronchiectasis (2.1 vs. 0.7 per 1,000 person-years; P < 0.001), with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.30) in the model adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for the competing risk of mortality. Regardless of smoking status, the risk of lung cancer was significantly higher in participants with bronchiectasis than in those without bronchiectasis (aHR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.17-1.41] for never-smokers; aHR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.44] for ever-smokers). Although bronchiectasis did not increase the risk of lung cancer among participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), it significantly increased the risk of lung cancer in participants without COPD (aHR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09-1.31]). Conclusions: The presence of bronchiectasis was associated with a higher risk of lung cancer after considering the smoking status.


Subject(s)
Bronchiectasis , Lung Neoplasms , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Cohort Studies , Fibrosis , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology
18.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 4003, 2022 03 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35256729

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFI) on nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) infection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) endemic area. We selected 1089 TNFI-treated RA patients and 4356 untreated RA patients using propensity-matching analysis according to age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database from July 2009 to December 2010. Both groups were followed-up until the end of 2016 to measure the incidence of mycobacterial diseases. The incidence rate of NTM in TNFI-treated RA group was similar to those of MTB (328.1 and 340.9 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of NTM for TNFI-treated RA compared to untreated RA was 1.751(95% CI 1.105-2.774). The risk of TNFI-associated NTM in RA was 2.108-fold higher among women than men. The age-stratified effects of TNFI on NTM development were significantly high in RA patients aged 50-65 years (aHR 2.018). RA patients without comorbidities had a higher incidence of NTM following TNFI treatment (aHR 1.742). This real-world, observational study highlights the need to increase awareness of NTM in TNFI-treated RA patients in an MTB endemic area.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis, Lymph Node , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapy , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/epidemiology , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/therapeutic use
19.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 256(3): 209-214, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35314528

ABSTRACT

Insufficient data are available on comprehensive evaluation of demographics, symptoms or signs, laboratory findings, and disease course in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to evaluate whether COPD patients are more prone to severe COVID-19 compared with those without COPD. We also investigate the clinical characteristics and disease course of COVID-19 in patients with COPD versus those without COPD. Patients were selected from a Korean nationwide cohort of 5,628 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and who had completed treatment or quarantine by April 30, 2020; 3,673 patients aged 40 years or older were included in this study. COPD was diagnosed using patient reports of physician-diagnosed COPD. During the study period, all patients with COVID-19 in Korea were hospitalized following the national health policy. Of the study participants, 38 (1.0%) had COPD. Regarding initial symptoms, COPD patients with COVID-19 showed greater sputum production (50.0% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.01) and dyspnea (36.8% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.01) than those without COPD. In addition, patients with COPD were more likely to receive oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (29.0% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.01) and had a higher mortality (21.1% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.01) than those without COPD. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities, COPD patients showed increased risk of severe COVID-19 compared with those without COPD. Our nationwide study showed that COVID-19 patients with COPD have higher symptomatic burden and more severe disease course than those without COPD.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Adult , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Disease Progression , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology
20.
Front Immunol ; 12: 779212, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34899739

ABSTRACT

Response to vaccines generally varies according to individual factors of the vaccinated subjects such as demographics and immune status. While there are various reports of factors associated with immunogenicity of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, little is known about those of adenovirus vector vaccines. We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the relationships of antibody level with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and adverse reactions (ARs) to an adenovirus vector vaccine, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Healthcare workers who planned to receive both the first and second injections of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine at Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, were enrolled in the study. Seven days after each injection, participants were asked to complete an online adverse reaction survey. In addition, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody concentration was measured 4 weeks after the second injection. All participants (n = 447, 100%) showed serologic positivity (≥ 0.8 U/mL) 4 weeks after the second injection of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Furthermore, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 S protein RBD concentration was similar among groups when stratified by age, sex, BMI, or presence and severity of AR; multivariable linear regression found no associations between antibody response to the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and age, BMI, sex, and vaccine-induced ARs. In conclusion, age, sex, obesity, and ARs were not associated with antibody responses after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administration & dosage , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Immunogenicity, Vaccine/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...