Clinical features and natural history of acquired third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerve palsy.

PURPOSE: Clinical features of acquired third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerve palsy showed variation among previous studies. Evaluation of natural course with objective criteria will establish accurate recovery rates and important factors for recovery. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on 206 patients who visited a neuro-ophthalmic department with acquired third, fourth, and sixth nerve palsy. Aetiology and results of ocular exam on each visit were reviewed, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors affecting recovery. RESULTS: The sixth cranial nerve was affected most frequently (n=108, 52.4%) and vascular disease (n=64, 31.1%) was the most common aetiology. Recovery was evaluated with change of deviation angle for 108 patients, who were first examined within a month of onset and followed up for at least 6 months. Ninety-two (85.2%) patients showed overall (at least partial) recovery and 73 (67.6%) showed complete recovery. In univariate analysis, initial deviation angle was found to be only significant factor associated with complete recovery (P=0.007) and most patients who experienced successful management of treatable underlying disease showed recovery. CONCLUSIONS: With objective criteria based on deviation angle, overall recovery rate from the third, fourth, and sixth nerve palsy was 85.2%. Patients who had smaller initial eyeball deviation or successful management of treatable underlying disease had a high chance of recovery.

Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation.

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to determine outcome and to identify predictors of success for biofeedback for constipation. METHODS: Patients who had at least one biofeedback session were evaluated whether or not they completed a treatment course. Parameters assessed included use of cathartics, number of spontaneous bowel movements per week, presence of rectal pain, number of biofeedback sessions and results of anorectal physiology. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients (59 male, 135 female) of median age 71 (range 11-96) years, including 30 with concomitant rectal pain, were treated. The median number of spontaneous bowel movements per week before treatment was 0. Some 35 per cent of patients had complete success (three or more spontaneous bowel movements per week with discontinuation of cathartics), 13 per cent had partial success (fewer than three spontaneous bowel movements per week with continued use of cathartics) and 51 per cent had no improvement. Neither patient age, sex nor duration of symptoms significantly affected outcome. Only 18 per cent of patients who had between two and four sessions had complete success, compared with 44 per cent of those who had five or more (P < 0.001). A total of 63 per cent of patients who completed the treatment protocol experienced complete success, compared with 25 per cent of those who self-discharged (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This large study indicates that the success rate of biofeedback for patients with constipation is less than previously reported. However, the success rate improves significantly after five or more sessions and is significantly related to the patient's willingness to complete treatment.

Are interpretations of video defecographies reliable and reproducible?

Video defecography is a dynamic investigation which can influence surgical decision making in constipated patients. A study was therefore undertaken to assess the inter and intraobserver variability in video defecography. Specifically, we sought to assess the interpretation of video defecographies by a group of observers with the same training, guidelines and standards. To determine interobserver variation, four independent observers, two blinded to the patient's history, reviewed 100 randomly sequenced video defecographies performed in constipated patients. The presence or absence of sigmoidocele, rectocele, intussusception or prolapse was noted. Adequate or improper function of the puborectalis, anal canal opening, anorectal angle (ARA) and grade of emptying of the rectum were also assessed. Two weeks after the initial assessment, intraobserver variation was determined by a repeat blinded review of unlabelled randomly sequenced studies. The results of interobserver accuracy for sigmoidoceles, rectoceles, intussusception, rectal prolapse, rectal emptying, opening of the anal canal, puborectalis contraction and straightening of the ARA and rectal emptying were 89.5%, 46.0%, 87.5%, 97.5%, 86.5%, 88.5%, 83.0%, and 80.0%, respectively. The intraobserver variations were 88.5%, 83.8%, 80.5%, 94.5%, 77.0%, 84.8%, 80.5% and 85.5%, respectively. Prior knowledge of the patient's history did not significantly influence the outcome. In summery, video defecography has an overall accuracy of 83.3% and as such is a valid tool in assessing constipated patients.

Patterns of anismus and the relation to biofeedback therapy.

PURPOSE: A study was undertaken to assess physiologic characteristics and clinical significance of anismus. Specifically, we sought to assess patterns of anismus and the relation of these findings to the success of therapy. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients were found to have anismus based on history and diagnostic criteria including anismus by defecography and at least one of three additional tests: anorectal manometry, electromyography, or colonic transit time study. Interpretation of defecography was based on the consensus of at least three of four observers. Anal canal hypertonia (n = 32) was defined when mean and maximum resting pressures were at least 1 standard deviation higher than those in 63 controls. There were two distinct defecographic patterns of anismus: Type A (n = 26), a flattened anorectal angle without definitive puborectalis indentation but a closed anal canal; Type B (n = 42), a clear puborectalis indentation, narrow anorectal angle, and closed anal canal. Outcomes of 57 patients who had electromyographybased biofeedback therapy were reported as either improved or unimproved at a mean follow-up of 23.7 (range, 6-62) months. These two types of anismus were compared with biofeedback outcome to assess clinical relevance. RESULTS: Patients with Type A anismus showed greater perineal descent at rest (mean, 5.1 vs. 3.5 cm; P < 0.01), greater dynamic descent between rest and evacuation (mean, 2.7 vs. 1.4 cm; P < 0.01), greater difference of anorectal angle between rest and evacuation (mean, 14.6 vs. -3.1 degrees; P < 0.001), higher mean resting pressure (mean, 77.1 vs. 62.8 mmHg; P < 0.05), lower mean squeeze pressure (58.8 vs. 80.7 mmHg; P < 0.05), and a higher incidence of anal canal hypertonia (69.2 vs. 33.3 percent; P < 0.01) than did patients with Type B anismus. Only 25 percent of patients who had Type A anismus with anal canal hypertonia were improved by biofeedback therapy. Conversely, 86 percent of patients with Type B anismus without anal canal hypertonia were successfully treated with biofeedback (P < 0.001; Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: These two distinct physiologic patterns of anismus correlate with the success of biofeedback treatment. Therefore, knowledge of these patterns may help direct therapy.