Cone-beam Computed Tomography Uses in Clinical Endodontics: Observer Variability in Detecting Periapical Lesions.

INTRODUCTION: The accurate interpretation of a cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) volume is critical in identifying the presence of disease correctly and consistently. The aim of this clinical study was to determine the effect of experience level on the detection of periapical lesions in CBCT volumes. METHODS: CBCT volumes of 22 maxillary molars were interpreted by 3 endodontic faculty, 3 endodontic residents, and 3 dental students. These groups were compared with the consensus opinion of 2 experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists. The observers determined the presence or absence of apical radiolucencies for each root using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Compared with the radiologists, the average weighted kappa value for endodontic faculty was 0.49, for endodontic residents it was 0.35 and for dental students it was 0.32. Intrarater reliability for each group showed endodontic faculty having the highest average weighted kappa value of 0.68 followed by endodontic residents (0.48) and dental students (0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians' experience level appears to be correlated with their ability to correctly diagnose periapical disease in CBCT volumes. In addition, experience leads to better inter-rater reliability. In neither of these 2 categories was agreement found to be excellent, suggesting that more can be done to improve the CBCT interpretation skills of clinicians at various levels of experience.

Second Mesiobuccal Canal Treatment in a Predoctoral Dental Clinic: A Retrospective Clinical Study.

The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the location and treatment of second canals in mesiobuccal roots (MB2) of first and second maxillary molars in a predoctoral endodontic clinic by the graduating classes of 2008 to 2015. These results were compared to similar clinical studies. Included in the study were 368 root canal treatments performed by 310 third- and fourth-year dental students at one U.S. dental school. All cases were done under faculty supervision, and the students were instructed to use dental loupe magnification. Students' evaluation sheets were used to deteremine the total MB2 canals treated in first and second maxillary molars. The results showed that, overall, 72.55% of the teeth had an MB2 canal treated. The frequency was higher in first molars (75.91%) than in second molars (56.92%) (p<0.05). Third-year students were able to detect 39 MB2 canals in 57 maxillary molars (68.42%), while fourth-year students detected 228 MB2 canals in 311 teeth (73.31%) (p>0.05). Under proper supervision by experienced endodontists, these dental students were capable of treating MB2 canals in maxillary molars. The frequency of MB2 canals located and treated by dental students with the assistance of experienced professionals was higher in first than in second molars. No significant difference was found between third- and fourth-year students. The incidence of MB2 canals located and treated in this study was found to be similar to that in other clinical studies.