Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 27(2): 519-535, 2018 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29582087

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Conditional use of communication skills refers to the ability of a learner to appropriately generalize and discriminate when, where, and how to communicate based on constant variation and shifts in environmental cues. Method: We describe discrimination and generalization challenges encountered by learners with complex communication needs and ways in which these challenges are fostered through traditional communication intervention programming. We address arrangements in instruction that maximize the probability of learners acquiring the conditional use of new vocabulary and the modest instructional technology implemented when planning for generalization. Results: We propose establishing well-discriminated and generalized use of new vocabulary items through the application of a general case instruction framework to communication intervention programming. Conclusion: We provide intervention methodology, including intervention steps for general case instruction, a plethora of functional examples, and graphic displays to assess and intervene to promote conditional use of communication skills for learners with complex communication needs.


Subject(s)
Communication , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation , Intellectual Disability/rehabilitation , Learning , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/rehabilitation , Speech-Language Pathology/methods , Cues , Disabled Persons/psychology , Discrimination, Psychological , Generalization, Psychological , Humans , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/psychology , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/diagnosis , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Vocabulary
2.
Semin Speech Lang ; 37(4): 259-273, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27701702

ABSTRACT

This article examines the growth of aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in providing support to children and youth with significant communication needs. Addressing current trends and offering a discussion of needs and probable future advances is framed around five guiding principles initially introduced by Williams, Krezman, and McNaughton. These include: (1) communication is a basic right and the use of AAC, especially at a young age, can help individuals realize their communicative potential; (2) AAC, like traditional communication, requires it to be fluid with the ability to adapt to different environments and needs; (3) AAC must be individualized and appropriate for each user; (4) AAC must support full participation in society across all ages and interests; and (5) individuals who use AAC have the right to be involved in all aspects of research, development, and intervention. In each of these areas current advances, needs, and future predictions are offered and discussed in terms of researchers' and practitioners' efforts to a continued upward trajectory of research and translational service delivery.


Subject(s)
Communication Aids for Disabled , Interdisciplinary Communication , Research , Communication , Forecasting , Humans
3.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch ; 45(4): 351-64, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25029564

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This investigation aimed to apply the dosage framework proposed by Warren, Fey, and Yoder (2007) to variations of milieu language teaching intervention strategies to explore how each of the dosage parameters (i.e., dose, dose form, dose frequency, total duration, and cumulative intervention intensity) was reported in the located empirically based applications with learners between birth and 23 years of age. METHOD: A systematic search located existing studies that implemented a milieu teaching intervention for children with developmental disabilities. Dosage data were then extracted from 42 studies along with study characteristics and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Only 37.8% of empirical investigations provided a clear definition of treatment intensity and reported the full range of dosage parameters, thus making it difficult to compare the results across investigations. Of the investigations that reported on all dosage parameters, the majority were single-case design as opposed to group design studies. CONCLUSIONS: Given the limited reporting of dosage parameters in existing studies, there is a need for closer attention to reporting this information in early communication intervention protocols. Replication and customization of interventions for learners experiencing developmental disabilities will only be possible with additional empirical examination of dosage parameters.


Subject(s)
Developmental Disabilities/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Communication , Early Intervention, Educational/methods , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Teaching
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...