Revolutionising rapid recovery: a quality improvement project in hip and knee replacement.

With increasing bed pressures and an ageing population, there is a need to increase throughput and reduce the bed burden of joint replacements. These issues were recognised in North Devon and an enhanced recovery pathway was established. Enhanced recovery, which aims to optimise the patient journey and shorten the inpatient admission, was first adopted for hip and knee replacements in North Devon District hospital in 2011. The Rapid Recovery Group, comprised a multidisciplinary team involved in the perioperative patient pathway, formed in the third financial quarter of 2018/2019 (Q3). The group was tasked with the optimisation of the pathway for patients requiring hip and knee replacement from referral to 12 months postoperation. Representatives from the group visited a similar sized hospital with successful outcomes from their pathway in order to compare and then construct a new pathway based on observed practices. Multiple interventions were instigated, alongside continuous data collection, forming a combination of simultaneous and sequential Plan Do Study Act cycles. Interventions involved intraoperative local anaesthetic injection protocols, use of Taurus frames together with nurse-led mobilisation and trials of simplified drug charts. Information collected included type of surgery, length of stay, who mobilised patients and when. Mean length of stay in total hip and knee replacement has dropped from 3.6 to 2.4 days and 3.6 to 2.0 days respectively, comparing mean for the fiscal year 2018/2019 to 2019/2020, putting the hospital in the top 10 trusts in the country. With multiple changes occurring simultaneously, the impact of individual elements is difficult to isolate but the overall impact of the interventions is evident. A drastic improvement in the length of stay has been seen and the collaborative multidisciplinary approach has been pivotal to success.

Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation.

Objective: To evaluate the acceptability to key stake holders of a newly introduced virtual clinic follow-up pathway for hip and knee joint replacement. Design: A service evaluation comprising a questionnaire sent electronically to 115 patients and interviews with 10 individuals. Setting: A newly introduced virtual clinic follow-up pathway for hip and knee replacement patients in a district general hospital. Participants: The electronic questionnaire was distributed to all patients treated under the virtual clinic service over a 5-month period (n=115). Purposive sampling from volunteers among respondents, leading to semi-structured interviews with eight patients. Two orthopaedic consultants were also interviewed. Intervention: Consultant review of web-based patient reported outcome measures and digital radiographs, with feedback to patients via letter, replacing face-to-face outpatient appointments for the follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement. Results: The response rate to the questionnaire was 40%. 44% indicated they would prefer a virtual appointment over a face-to-face consultation in future. The most common word in the free text comments was 'good' (n=107).Seven main themes were identified from the patient interviews: patient understanding and expectations, patient confidence, patient voice, managing deterioration of condition, patient benefit, patient satisfaction using technology and navigating the website.Two main themes were identified from the staff interviews: the adapting patient pathway and project management.Combined analysis elucidated that patients who were doing well liked the 'click and go' approach but those with problems were concerned about how to report these and were therefore less satisfied. Conclusion: The virtual clinic process appears to be well accepted by both patients and clinicians. However, appropriate patient selection and clear pathways of communication to address patient concerns are pivotal to success.

Non-operative management, supported by self-monitoring using web-based patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), in knee osteoarthritis.

Despite being straightforward to collect and key to providing patient-centred, individualised care, the routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains limited in the National Health Service. Herein is described the case of a 69-year-old woman who presented to secondary care with osteoarthritis. Web-based PROMs were used to track the patient's symptoms and function. Lifestyle changes were recommended to manage the osteoarthritis. Monitoring enabled the patient to take control of her disease management. Two years later, she continues to manage her knee symptoms conservatively, recording progress by using a web-based system. This case illustrates how web-based PROMs can be used to support conservative management of knee osteoarthritis by both empowering patients and minimising the burden on secondary care outpatient services.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness, comparing traction to intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures, in the less economically developed context.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral shaft fractures carry considerable morbidity and are increasingly common in less economically developed countries (LEDCs). Treatment options include traction and intramedullary (IM) nailing but in a limited-resource environment; cost-effectiveness is fundamental to policy development. The objective herein was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of moving from traction to IM nailing for femoral shaft fractures, in adults, in LEDCs. Incorporating a systematic review of complications and functional outcomes and a cost-minimization analysis. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Africa Journals Online and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception using the terms: femur* AND fracture AND traction AND (sign OR nail* OR intramedullary) AND (cost-effectiveness OR cost* OR outcome OR function) NOT paed* NOT child* NOT elastic NOT neck NOT intertrochanteric NOT periprosthetic (where asterisks indicate an unlimited truncation strategy). Abstracts were reviewed for all titles returned and full texts obtained as indicated. References of all relevant papers were also examined for further studies. RESULTS: IM nailing has been successfully used in several institutions and reported infection, union and reoperation rates are encouraging, although no randomised control trials were identified. Three studies assessed the cost aspect and all found IM nailing to be the cheaper strategy. CONCLUSION: To date, the improved complication profile and reduced cost of treatment suggest that IM nailing is more cost-effective than traction. Evidence, however, is limited and the necessity for appropriate training and audit with the introduction of new techniques must be emphasised.