Efficacy and safety of an oral device to reduce food intake and promote weight loss.

Objective: Minimal risk weight loss tools are needed. This study's objective was to confirm Food and Drug Administration submissions of the SmartByte™ System's safety and efficacy. Methods: This 16-week, prospective, single-arm, four-centre, observational study assessed the oral device in combination with a video-delivered lifestyle programme in adults aged 18-49 years with body mass index 27 to <35 kg m-2. Results: Seventy-six subjects received the device and video lifestyle instruction. The prespecified per protocol (PP) population (N = 40) required sensor-verified use of the device ≥7 times per week for 14 of 16 weeks, overall device usage rate of ≥33% and study completion. At week 16, 12 (30%) achieved ≥5% weight loss, 16 (40%) achieved ≥4% and 21 (52.5%) achieved ≥3%. Week 16 mean loss for the PP population was 2.93%, and among 36 participants who did not meet PP criteria, it was 1.45%. Among 76 intent-to-treat subjects, two subjects reported three mild to moderate device-related adverse events, resolving spontaneously (one hard palate abrasion and two tongue lacerations). Conclusion: The System, a minimal risk tool, can help individuals achieve meaningful weight loss, when used with a lifestyle video. More frequent device use was associated with more weight loss, on average, and greater chance of achieving ≥4% or ≥5% weight loss.

The impact of blood glucose monitoring on depression and distress in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether a structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) protocol reduces depressive symptoms and diabetes distress. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 12-month, cluster-randomised, clinical trial compared patients who received a collaborative, structured SMBG, physician/patient intervention with an active control. Studied were 483 insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients (experimental = 256, control = 227) (≥ 7.5% HbA1c) from 34 primary care practices (experimental = 21, control = 13). Experimental patients used a paper tool to record a 7-point SMBG profile on each of three consecutive days prior to their quarterly physician visit. Patients and physicians interpreted SMBG results to make medication and lifestyle changes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NIH Trial Registry Number: NCT00674986. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire: PHQ-8), diabetes-related distress (Diabetes Distress Scale: DDS). HbA1c and SMBG frequency were assessed quarterly; data were analysed using Linear Mixed Models (LMM) for intent-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS: ITT analyses showed significant improvement in depression and disease-related distress among experimental and control patients from baseline to 12 months (p < 0.01 in both cases) with no between-group differences. Experimental patients displayed significantly greater reductions in distress related to regimen adherence than controls. Also, experimental patients with elevated diabetes distress or depressive symptoms at baseline showed significantly greater reductions in distress and depressive symptoms than control patients at 12 months. The greater improvement in mood in the experimental than control group was independent of improvements in glycaemic control and changes in SMBG frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Using well standardised measures, collaborative, structured SMBG leads to reductions, not increases, in depressive symptoms and diabetes distress over time, for the large number of moderately depressed or distressed type 2 patients in poor glycaemic control. Changes in affective status are independent of improvements in glycaemic control and changes in SMBG frequency for these patients.

A systematic approach to risk stratification and intervention within a managed care environment improves diabetes outcomes and patient satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a comprehensive diabetes management program that included risk stratification and social marketing would improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction within a managed care organization (MCO). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The 12-month prospective trial was conducted at primary care clinics within a MCO and involved 370 adults with diabetes. Measurements included 1) the frequency of dilated eye and foot examinations, microalbuminuria assessment, blood pressure measurement, lipid profile, and HbA(1c) measurement; 2) changes in blood pressure, lipid levels, and HbA(1c) levels; and 3) changes in patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Complete data are reported for the 193 patients who had been enrolled for 12 months; life table analysis is reported for all patients who remained enrolled at the study's end as well as for a comparative control group of 623 patients. For the 193 patients for whom 12-month data were available, the number of patients in the low-risk category (HbA(1c) <7%) increased by 51.1%. A total of 97.4% of patients with an HbA(1c) >8% at baseline had a change in treatment regimen. Patients at the highest risk for coronary heart disease (LDL >130 mg/dl) decreased from 25.4% at baseline to 20.2%. Patients with a blood pressure <130/85 mmHg increased from 23.8 to 44.6%. Of these patients, 63.0% had changes in medication. Patients and providers expressed significant increases in satisfaction with the program. CONCLUSIONS: The program was successful in initiating the recommended changes in the diabetic therapeutic regimen, resulting in improved glycemic control, increased monitoring/management of diabetic complications, and greater patient and provider satisfaction. These results should have great significance in the design of future programs in MCOs aimed at improving the care of people with diabetes and other chronic diseases.