Impact of moderate interval exercise versus supine rest on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic profiles of subcutaneously administered growth hormone in adult growth hormone deficient patients.

BACKGROUND: Diurnal variation in serum growth hormone (s-GH) levels after exogenous GH delivery has previously been reported in patients with no endogenous GH secretion. Changes in postural position or physical activity, leading to changes in blood flow and/or lymphatic drainage may be underlying explanations. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study is to study a possible impact of exercise and supine rest on pharmacokinetics (PK) and day-to-day variation of subcutaneously (s.c.) administered GH in adult GH deficient (AGHD) patients. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: The secondary aim of this study is to compare s-IGF-I, s-insulin, and plasma (p)-glucose profiles after a carbohydrate rich breakfast following s.c. GH injection vs. continuous infusion. DESIGN AND METHODS: During supine rest eight AGHD males (59.8±8 years, BMI 29.7±4.9 kg/m(2)) were treated with one daily s.c. GH injections of 3 mg/24 h for 48 h (treatment sessions A, B) or a continuous s.c. GH infusion of 3 mg/24 h for 60 h (treatment sessions C, D). Exercise comprised 1 h bicycling with 50 W load on two consecutive days during treatment sessions B and D. RESULTS: Administration of GH as a bolus injection, but not as a continuous GH infusion, resulted in about 32% higher s-GH levels during exercise (60 min) as well as 30 min after (s-GH logAUC(B-A) difference was 0.28; 95% CI: 0.14-0.4; p<0.001). However, the total s-GH(AUC 0-24 h) (p=0.75) and s-IGF-I(AUC0-48 h) levels (p=0.51) remained unchanged between the two occasions. P-glucose and insulin profiles were significantly higher after carbohydrate rich breakfast before first and second dosing both following s.c. GH injection and continuous infusion (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate exercise intermittently increased s-GH levels. These changes seem to have no clinical short-term relevance, since total s-GH(24 h) and s-IGF-I(48 h) levels were unaffected.

Circadian variation in the pharmacokinetics of steady state continuous subcutaneous infusion of growth hormone in adult growth hormone deficient patients.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in growth hormone (GH)-deficient (GHD) patients have indicated a possible diurnal variation in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of GH after subcutaneous (sc) GH administration. Thus, higher GH levels were observed during the night with continuous sc infusion, and increased GH bioavailability was reported following daily sc injections in the evening compared to morning. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to study whether diurnal variability in the PK of sc administered exogenous GH can be reproduced under standard conditions for all study participants, e.g. supine rest. DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight male GHD patients (59.8 ± 8 years, body mass index 29.7 ± 4.9 kg/m(2)) received a continuous sc infusion of GH (3mg/24h) for 60 h on two different occasions. Diurnal variation in PK of GH was studied during steady state in the last 24h of the infusion period. RESULTS: Median GH levels were higher at night time (23:00 h-07:00 h) than during the day (10:00 h-18:00 h) for visit 1 [5.1 (4.5-7.2 ng/ml/0.5h) vs. 4.6 (3.7-5.7 ng/ml/0.5h); p<0.05], and reproducible results of diurnal GH variation were obtained during visit 2 [5.7 (4.6-7.4) ng/ml/0.5h vs. 4.6 (3.8-6.0) ng/ml/0.5h, p<0.05]. Reproducible results between days 1 and 2 were also obtained during 08:30 h-20:30 h and 20:30 h-08:30 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Previous findings of higher nocturnal GH levels were confirmed during steady state continuous sc GH infusion under standard conditions. The underlying mechanisms, e.g. whether GH absorption, distribution or elimination is primarily affected need to be further elucidated.

Soluble CD163: a biomarker linking macrophages and insulin resistance.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Soluble CD163 (sCD163) was recently identified as a strong risk marker for developing type 2 diabetes. We hypothesised that sCD163 independently associates with insulin resistance. METHODS: This cross-sectional study includes 234 participants: 96 with type 2 diabetes, 34 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 104 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), matched for sex and BMI. Glucose-lowering medication was paused for 1 week before plasma samples were obtained for determination of sCD163 and other inflammatory and metabolic variables. Insulin resistance was estimated by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). RESULTS: Concentrations of sCD163 were 1.95 mg/l (0.63-6.97) in individuals with type 2 diabetes, 1.64 mg/l (0.58-4.19) in those with IGT, and 1.48 mg/l (0.48-4.11) (median [range]) in those with NGT (p < 0.0001). In univariate analyses, sCD163 correlated significantly with HOMA-IR (R = 0.44), insulin (R = 0.41), glucose (R = 0.30), triacylglycerol (R = 0.29) and HDL-cholesterol (R = -0.34) (all p < 0.0001). All but glucose remained significant when adjusting for age, sex, BMI and glycaemic group. In univariate regression analyses, HOMA-IR was associated with sCD163, C-reactive protein (CRP), TNF-α and IL-6 (all p ≤ 0.0001). An increase of 50% in sCD163 resulted in an estimated increase in HOMA-IR of 36% (95% CI 26, 48; p < 0.0001). In multiple linear regression analyses, sCD163 (p = 0.001) and CRP (p = 0.01) remained independent predictors of HOMA-IR, whereas TNF-α and IL-6 did not. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Macrophage-specific sCD163 was strongly associated with insulin resistance independently of TNF-α and other predictors. Moreover, sCD163 was associated with well-known variables of the metabolic syndrome.

Do all patients with type 2 diabetes need breakfast?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if an improved daily glycemic profile could be achieved in patients with type 2 diabetes by withholding breakfast, but maintaining the same total daily intake of calorie and the same composition of carbohydrates, fat and protein. METHODS: Thirteen type 2 diabetic patients participated in this randomized crossover study. Following an initial fasting night the study consisted of 4 consecutive days. Patients were randomized to diets including breakfast days 1 and 3, and excluding breakfast days 2 and 4, or vice versa. RESULTS: The mean plasma glucose level was 0.24 mmol/l higher after the breakfast diet compared with the non-breakfast diet, but reflected only a tendency (P=0.066). The standard deviation based on plasma glucose was 32% higher after the breakfast diet compared with the non-breakfast diet (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Not all patients with type 2 diabetes may need breakfast. Moreover, a non-breakfast diet reduces glycemic variability.

Obesity does not influence the unique pharmacological properties of different biphasic insulin aspart preparations in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To investigate the influence of obesity in type 2 diabetic patients upon pharmacological properties of different biphasic preparations of insulin aspart. METHODS: A total of 75 type 2 diabetic patients were stratified according to their body mass index (BMI) into 40 non-obese (BMI 23-28 kg/m(2)) and 35 obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m(2)) subjects. The trial was a double-blinded crossover study. In two periods of 4 weeks each the patients received subcutaneous injections of biphasic insulin aspart 50 (BIAsp 50) or biphasic insulin aspart 70 (BIAsp 70) thrice daily in random order. Insulin doses were titrated individually. At the end of each period 24-h serum profiles of insulin aspart, C-peptide and glucose were recorded. The primary endpoint was the area under the curve of serum glucose concentration during 24 h (AUC(Glu)(0-24 h)). RESULTS: The insulin concentration profiles of BIAsp 50 and 70 were as expected according to the content of protamine-bound insulin aspart (50 and 30% respectively). AUC(Glu(0-24 h)) BIAsp 50/BIAsp 70 ratios were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-1.05, p = 0.49) for non-obese and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.92-1.05, p = 0.55) for obese. Fasting serum glucose (FSG) BIAsp 50/BIAsp 70 ratios were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96, p = 0.002) for non-obese and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.97, p = 0.006) for obese. During both treatment regimens the frequency of minor hypoglycaemic episodes was highest for the non-obese group. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the two preparations of biphasic insulin aspart were different; however, they were not influenced by the degree of obesity in type 2 diabetic patients.

Pharmacokinetics following continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion of insulin aspart with or without initial subcutaneous bolus.

AIM: To evaluate time to steady state insulin concentration (C(ss)) following continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) of insulin aspart (IAsp) with or without an initial s.c. bolus. METHODS: In random order 10 healthy volunteers were given a basal insulin infusion rate (0.5 U/h) for 8 h with or without an initial s.c. bolus (1.4 U). Serum IAsp was measured until 3 h after infusion was stopped. RESULTS: An overshoot of IAsp was seen before C(ss) was achieved following an initial bolus of insulin as compared to no bolus. The apparent half-life (t((1/2))) with or without bolus did not differ (p = 0.15). Time to steady state (T(ss)) was evaluated in two ways: (1) T(ss) defined as the first point within an interval of C(ss)+/- 2 x CV was 233 vs. 166 min with and without a bolus respectively (p = 0.068). (2) A t-test was performed for each concentration-time point vs. mean C(ss), and the first point with no significance was defined, T(ss). This gave 208 (p = 0.09) and 178 min (p = 0.24) with and without bolus respectively. Mathematical modelling suggests that an ideal mean bolus should be 0.89 U, and that this bolus dose may result in a shorter T(ss). CONCLUSION: A bolus of 1.4 U resulted in an overshoot of serum IAsp before C(ss) and a longer period before C(ss) is achieved. Mathematical modelling suggests that a mean bolus of 0.89 U would result in a faster achievement of C(ss) compared to no bolus.

Insulin and glucose profiles during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with injection of a long-acting insulin in Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To compare insulin and glucose profiles during basal continuous subcutaneous infusion of a rapid-acting insulin analogue and once daily subcutaneous injection of a long-acting insulin analogue in Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral glucose-lowering agents were randomized in this two-period crossover study to an equivalent 24-h dose of continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin aspart and subsequently once-daily bedtime subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine, or vice versa, for eight consecutive days. Plasma profiles of insulin and glucose were recorded. RESULTS: On the last day of each treatment period, the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose was 10% lower on the continuous subcutaneous infusion regimen compared with the insulin injection regimen (P = 0.002). This was accomplished by a flat exogenous insulin infusion profile compared with a peaking profile with injected insulin (AUC was 74% higher after injection compared with pre-injection levels (P = 0.001)). During the last 6 days in each treatment period, the intra-subject variability of exogenous fasting insulin levels in the mornings was 41% lower during insulin infusion compared with insulin injection (P = 0.012). The corresponding intra-subject variability for fasting glucose only showed a tendency to be lower during infusion as compared to the injection regimen (28%; P = 0.104). Thirteen symptomatic-only or minor hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during the entire infusion period compared with three episodes during the injection period. CONCLUSIONS: Basal continuous subcutaneous infusion of a rapid-acting insulin analogue improved plasma insulin (more flat insulin profile with a lower variability) and glucose (lower AUC) profiles compared with once-daily subcutaneous injection of a long-acting insulin analogue in Type 2 diabetes.

Overnight CSII as supplement to oral antidiabetic drugs in type 2 diabetes.

AIM: To evaluate the potential advantages of a constant overnight subcutaneous delivery of insulin in type 2 diabetic patients who fail to achieve glycaemic control on oral antidiabetics. METHODS: Ten type 2 diabetic patients treated with oral antidiabetic drugs without gaining sufficient glycaemic control were included in this three-period study. All patients received continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with a short-acting insulin analogue, 2 IU/h, for 8 h during three consecutive nights (period A). Based upon the results from period A, two additional dose regimens of three nights (period B and C) were studied in random order. Serum insulin aspart, human insulin and plasma glucose (PG) profiles were recorded. RESULTS: In period A, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was reduced from a mean +/- s.d. (mmol/l) value of 11.6 +/- 2.9 to 5.5 +/- 1.6 (p < 0.0001) during the first night. No additional lowering of FPG was seen the two succeeding nights. FPG narrowed as the range before the infusion was 7.3-15.2 mmol/l compared with 3.6-6.1 mmol/l on the last morning after infusion. The variability in PG profile during the first and the last night of CSII was small and not significantly different. The rising insulin aspart was mirrored by a decrease in human insulin. In period B and C, similar tendencies as for period A were seen. In period A, two patients each experienced one mild hypoglycaemic episode. CONCLUSIONS: CSII with an insulin analogue overnight effectively reduced FPG without occurrence of major hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetic patients who fail to achieve glycaemic control on oral antidiabetic treatment.