Trunk muscle dysfunction in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2 and its contribution to chronic low back pain.

Introduction: Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (MD2) presents with a varied manifestation. Even though the myopathy in these patients is more widespread, axial musculature involvement is one of the most prominent conditions. MD2 patients also often report chronic low back pain (CLBP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate trunk muscle function, including respiratory muscles, in patients with MD2 and to compare it with healthy controls, to determine the occurrence of CLBP in patients with MD2, and to assess whether trunk muscle dysfunction increases the risk of CLBP in these patients. Methods: We enrolled 40 MD2 patients (age range 23 to 76 years, 26 women). A comprehensive battery of tests was used to evaluate trunk muscle function. The tests consisted of quantitative muscle strength testing of low back extensor muscles and respiratory muscles and the assessment of trunk muscle endurance. A neurological evaluation contained procedures assessing the distribution of muscle weakness, myotonia, and pain, and used questionnaires focused on these items and on disability, depression, and physical activity. Results: The results of this study suggest that patients with MD2 show significant dysfunction of the trunk muscles, including the respiratory muscles, expressed by decreased muscle strength and endurance. The prevalence of CLBP in patients with MD2 was 52.5%. Based on our analysis, the only independent significant risk factor for CLBP in these patients was maximal isometric lower back extensor strength in a prone position ≤ 15.8 kg (OR = 37.3). Other possible risk factors were severity of myotonia and reduced physical activity. Conclusion: Outcomes of this study highlighted the presence of axial muscle dysfunction, respiratory muscle weakness, and frequent occurrence of CLBP together with its risk factors in patients with MD2. We believe that the findings of this study may help in management and prevention programs for patients with MD2.

Anti-Müllerian hormone as an ovarian reserve marker in women with the most frequent muscular dystrophies.

Some muscular dystrophies may have a negative impact on fertility. A decreased ovarian reserve is 1 of the factors assumed to be involved in fertility impairment. AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone) is currently considered the best measure of ovarian reserve.A total of 21 females with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1), 25 females with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (MD2), 12 females with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), 12 female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations (cDMD) and 86 age-matched healthy controls of reproductive age (range 18 - 44 years) were included in this case control study. An enzymatically amplified 2-site immunoassay was used to measure serum AMH level.The MD1 group shows a significant decrease of AMH values (median 0.7 ng/mL; range 0 - 4.9 ng/mL) compared with age-matched healthy controls (P < .01). AMH levels were similar between patients and controls in terms of females with MD2 (P = .98), FSHD (P = .55) and cDMD (P = .60).This study suggests decreased ovarian reserve in women with MD1, but not in MD2, FSHD and cDMD.

Quantitative myotonia assessment with a commercially available dynamometer in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to develop a simple method for quantitative assessment of myotonia in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and DM2, to compare the myotonia severity, and to correlate this objective outcome with a subjective scale, the Myotonia Behaviour Scale (MBS). METHODS: A commercially available dynamometer was used for all measurements. The relaxation time after voluntary contraction was measured in 20 patients with DM1, 25 patients with DM2, and 35 healthy controls. RESULTS: The average relaxation time was 0.17 s in controls, 2.96 s in patients with DM1, and 0.4 s in patients with DM2. The correlation between relaxation time and MBS score was significant, 0.627 in patients with DM1 and 0.581 in patients with DM2. DISCUSSION: Our method provides a valid and reliable quantitative measure of grip myotonia suitable as an outcome measure in clinical trials and as part of routine examinations to gather data on the natural history of myotonic disorders. Muscle Nerve 59:431-435, 2019.