ABSTRACT
Dialyzer reprocessing with heated water (100 to 105 degrees C) for 20 h can be used safely in lieu of chemical methods for disinfection. All infective agents including spores are destroyed and depyrogenation may occur. However, these temperatures may result in structural damage to the dialyzer, limiting reuse. Dialyzer reprocessing by using 1.5% citric acid heated to 95 degrees C for 20 h is an alternative method that produces equivalent microbiologic effects. Citric acid is well known as a disinfecting agent used for dialysis equipment. Because there is little structural damage to dialyzer components at 95 degrees C, reuse statistics are improved (mean reuse increased to 12.8). Both small and large molecule clearances and the sieving coefficient for protein are insignificantly altered by the process. Whereas the procedure is relatively simple, quality-assurance indicators are essential. The method has appeal because it avoids the use of chemical germicides. However, at present it has only been tested thoroughly in polysulfone dialyzers with heat-resistant polycarbonate casings and polyurethane resin. The clinical experience is favorable.
Subject(s)
Citric Acid/pharmacology , Disinfection/methods , Renal Dialysis/instrumentation , Heating , HumansABSTRACT
In treating patients with end-stage renal disease, the dialyzer may be used on multiple occasions rather than once. Long-term effects of this practice are unknown. We report 259 and 1,059 successive patients from facilities practicing reuse in Cincinnati and Detroit, followed, respectively, for 535 and 2,209 patient years. The morbidity was relatively low, expressed by the number of hospital admissions (1.63 and 2.19/year) and by days in hospital (14.24 and 22.71/year), respectively. In Cincinnati the unadjusted case fatality rate was 70% of that in the Ohio Valley Renal Disease Network, in Detroit it was 96% of that in the Michigan Renal Network. There were no adverse long-term effects of multiple use of dialyzers.
