Seizure Burden and Neurologic Outcomes After Neonatal Encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Seizures are common during neonatal encephalopathy (NE), but the contribution of seizure burden (SB) to outcomes remains controversial. This study aims to examine the relationship between electrographic SB and neurologic outcomes after NE. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited newborns ≥36 weeks postmenstrual age around 6 hours of life between August 2014 and November 2019 from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Participants underwent continuous electroencephalography for at least 48 hours, brain MRI within 3-5 days of life, and structured follow-up at 18 months. Electrographic seizures were identified by board-certified neurophysiologists and quantified as total SB and maximum hourly SB. A medication exposure score was calculated based on all antiseizure medications given during NICU admission. Brain MRI injury severity was classified based on basal ganglia and watershed scores. Developmental outcomes were measured using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Third Edition. Multivariable regression analyses were performed, adjusting for significant potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 108 enrolled infants, 98 had continuous EEG (cEEG) and MRI data collected, of which 5 were lost to follow-up, and 6 died before age 18 months. All infants with moderate-severe encephalopathy completed therapeutic hypothermia. cEEG-confirmed neonatal seizures occurred in 21 (24%) newborns, with a total SB mean of 12.5 ± 36.4 minutes and a maximum hourly SB mean of 4 ± 10 min/h. After adjusting for MRI brain injury severity and medication exposure, total SB was significantly associated with lower cognitive (-0.21, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.08, p = 0.002) and language (-0.25, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.11, p = 0.001) scores at 18 months. Total SB of 60 minutes was associated with 15-point decline in language scores and 70 minutes for cognitive scores. However, SB was not significantly associated with epilepsy, neuromotor score, or cerebral palsy (p > 0.1). DISCUSSION: Higher SB during NE was independently associated with worse cognitive and language scores at 18 months, even after adjusting for exposure to antiseizure medications and severity of brain injury. These observations support the hypothesis that neonatal seizures occurring during NE independently contribute to long-term outcomes.

Standing, Transition, and Walking Ability in Older Adults: The Case for Independently Evaluating Different Domains of Mobility Function.

BACKGROUND: Independent mobility is a complex behavior that relies on the ability to walk, maintain stability, and transition between postures. However, guidelines for assessment that details what elements of mobility to evaluate and how they should be measured remain unclear. METHODS: Performance on tests of standing, sit-to-stand, and walking were evaluated in a cohort of 135 complex, comorbid, and older adults (mean age 87 ± 5.5 years). Correlational analysis was conducted to examine the degree of association for measures within and between mobility domains on a subset of participants (n = 83) able to complete all tasks unaided. Participants were also grouped by the presence of risk markers for frailty (gait speed and grip strength) to determine if the level of overall impairment impacted performance scores and if among those with risk markers, the degree of association was greater. RESULTS: Within-domain relationships for sit-to-stand and walking were modest (rho = 0.01-0.60). Associations either did not exist or relationships were weak for measures reflecting different domains (rho = -0.35 to 0.25, p > 0.05). As expected, gait speed differed between those with and without frailty risk markers (p < 0.001); however, balance and sit-to-stand measures did not (p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need to independently evaluate different mobility domains within an individual as a standard assessment approach. Modest within-domain relationships emphasize the need to account for multiple, unique control challenges within more complex domains. These findings have important implications for standardized mobility assessment and targeted rehabilitation strategies for older adults.