Pharmacological profile of the NOP agonist and cough suppressing agent SCH 486757 (8-[Bis(2-Chlorophenyl)Methyl]-3-(2-Pyrimidinyl)-8-Azabicyclo[3.2.1]Octan-3-Ol) in preclinical models.

We describe the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles of SCH 486757, a nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor agonist that has recently entered human clinical trials for cough. SCH 486757 selectively binds human NOP receptor (K(i)=4.6+/-0.61nM) over classical opioid receptors. In a guinea pig capsaicin cough model, SCH 486757 (0.01-1mg/kg) suppressed cough at 2, 4, and 6h post oral administration with a maximum efficacy occurring at 4h equivalent to codeine, hydrocodone, dextromethorphan and baclofen. The antitussive effects of SCH 486757 (3.0mg/kg, p.o.) was blocked by the NOP receptor antagonist J113397 (12mg/kg, i.p.) but not by naltrexone (10mg/kg, p.o.). SCH 486757 does not produce tolerance to its antitussive activity after a 5-day BID dosing regimen. After acute and chronic dosing paradigms, SCH 486757 (1mg/kg) inhibited capsaicin-evoked coughing by 46+/-9% and 40+/-11%, respectively. In a feline mechanically-evoked cough model, SCH 486757 produces a maximum inhibition of cough and expiratory abdominal electromyogram amplitude of 59 and 61%, respectively. SCH 486757 did not significantly affect inspiratory electromyogram amplitude. We examined the abuse potential of SCH 486757 (10mg/kg, p.o.) in a rat conditioned place preference procedure which is sensitive to classical drugs of abuse, such as amphetamine and morphine. SCH 486757 was without effect in this model. Finally, SCH 486757 displays a good oral pharmacokinetic profile in the guinea pig, rat and dog. We conclude that SCH 486757 has a favorable antitussive profile in preclinical animal models.

Effect of a novel NOP receptor agonist (SCH 225288) on guinea pig irritant-evoked, feline mechanically induced and canine infectious tracheobronchitis cough.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), the endogenous peptide ligand for the G-protein-coupled NOP receptor, inhibits cough in experimental models. SCH 225288 is a nonpeptide, orally active NOP agonist that may provide the foundation for the development of novel treatments for cough. METHODS: First we characterized the selectivity of SCH 225288 in human receptor binding assays. Afterwards, the antitussive activity of SCH 225288 was studied in three mechanistically distinct cough models. Specifically, we observed the cough-suppressant effect of SCH 225288 in a guinea pig capsaicin irritant-evoked cough model, a feline mechanically induced cough model and finally in a canine Bordetella bronchiseptica disease model. RESULTS: SCH 225288 selectively binds human NOP receptor (K(i) = 0.38 +/- 0.02 nmol/l) over classical opioid receptors (COR). In a guinea pig capsaicin cough model, SCH 225288 (0.1-1 mg/kg) suppressed cough at 2, 4, and 6 h after oral administration. The antitussive effect of SCH 225288 (3.0 mg/kg, p.o.) was blocked by the NOP antagonist J113397 (12 mg/kg, i.p.) but not by the classical opioid receptor (COR) antagonist, naltrexone (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.). In the anesthetized cat, we evaluated the effects of SCH 225288 given either intravenously or via the intravertebral artery against the increases in cough number and respiratory expiratory and inspiratory muscle (rectus abdominis and parasternal) electromyographic (EMG) activities due to perturbations of the intrathoracic trachea. SCH 225288 (0.03-3.0 mg/kg, i.v.) inhibited both cough number and abdominal EMG amplitudes. Similarly, SCH 225288 (0.001-0.3 mg/kg) administered intra-arterially also diminished cough number and abdominal EMG amplitudes. No significant effect of the drug was noted on parasternal EMG activity. Finally, we studied the antitussive actions of SCH 225288 (1.0 mg/kg) in a canine B. bronchiseptica disease model. In this model, dogs were challenged intranasally with B. bronchiseptica. Comparisons were made between a vehicle group, an SCH 225288 (1.0 mg/kg, p.o., q.d.) and a butorphanol (0.6 mg/kg, p.o., b.i.d.) group on the mean change in cough scores from baseline values and days 6-9 after B. bronchiseptica challenge. SCH 225288 (1.0 mg/kg, p.o., q.d.) displayed a positive antitussive tendency (p = 0.06) to inhibit B. bronchiseptica cough whereas butorphanol (0.6 mg/kg, p.o., b.i.d.) was devoid of antitussive activity. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the present data show that SCH 225288 is a potent and effective antitussive agent in animal models of cough. Furthermore, these findings indicate that NOP agonists represent a promising new therapeutic approach for the treatment of cough without the side effect liabilities associated with opioid antitussives.

Characterization of the potent and highly selective A2A receptor antagonists preladenant and SCH 412348 [7-[2-[4-2,4-difluorophenyl]-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-2-(2-furanyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine] in rodent models of movement disorders and depression.

The adenosine A(2A) receptor has been implicated in the underlying biology of various neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD) and depression. Preladenant and SCH 412348 [7-[2-[4-2,4-difluorophenyl]-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-2-(2-furanyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine] are potent competitive antagonists of the human A(2A) receptor (K(i) = 1.1 and 0.6 nM, respectively) and have >1000-fold selectivity over all other adenosine receptors, making these compounds the most selective A(2A) receptor antagonists reported to date. Both compounds attenuate hypolocomotion induced by the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS-21680 [2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine], suggesting that they inhibit A(2A) receptor activity in vivo. Their high degree of selectivity and robust in vivo activity make preladenant and SCH 412348 useful tools to investigate the role of the A(2A) receptor system in animal models of PD and depression. Oral administration of preladenant and SCH 412348 (0.1-1 mg/kg) to rats potentiated 3,4-dihydroxy-L-phenylalanine (L-Dopa)-induced contralateral rotations after 6-hydroxydopamine lesions in the medial forebrain bundle and potently attenuated the cataleptic effects of haloperidol. Preladenant (1 mg/kg) inhibited L-Dopa-induced behavioral sensitization after repeated daily administration, which suggests a reduced risk of the development of dyskinesias. Finally, preladenant and SCH 412348 exhibited antidepressant-like profiles in models of behavioral despair, namely the mouse tail suspension test and the mouse and rat forced swim test. These studies demonstrate that preladenant and SCH 412348 are potent and selective A(2A) receptor antagonists and provide further evidence of the potential therapeutic benefits of A(2A) receptor inhibition in PD (with reduced risk of dyskinesias) and depression (one of the primary nonmotor symptoms of PD).

Antitussive profile of the NOP agonist Ro-64-6198 in the guinea pig.

We have previously shown that N/OFQ, the endogenous peptide ligand for the 'opioid-like' NOP receptor, inhibits cough in guinea pigs and cats. In the present study we sought to continue our characterization of the cough-suppressant effects of NOP stimulation by profiling the pulmonary and antitussive effects of a novel non-peptide NOP agonist, Ro-64-6198, in guinea pigs. In receptor-binding assays, we confirmed that Ro-64-6198 selectively binds to NOP receptors over other opioid receptors. The Ki values for Ro-64-6198 at NOP, MOP, KOP and DOP receptors was 0.3, 36, 214 and 3,787 nmol/l, respectively. In GTPgammaS-binding assays, Ro-64-6198 displayed >900-fold functional selectivity at NOP relative to MOP receptors. We evaluated the effects of Ro-64-6198 (3 and 10 micromol/l) in isolated guinea pig nodose ganglia cells on the increases in intracellular Ca2+ concentration evoked by capsaicin stimulation (1 x 10(-8)-1 x 10(-6) mol/l). Similar to previously reported data with N/OFQ, Ro-64-6198 (3 and 10 micromol/l) significantly attenuated Ca2+ responses in nodose ganglia cells produced by exposure to capsaicin. The effect of Ro-64-6198 (3 micromol/l) on capsaicin-induced intracellular Ca2+ responses was blocked by the NOP antagonist, J113397 (3 micromol/l). In guinea pig in vivo studies, aerosolized capsaicin (10-300 micromol/l) produced a dose-dependent increase in cough number. Ro-64-6198 given i.p. significantly inhibited cough due to capsaicin (300 micromol/l) exposure. In a duration study we found that the maximum antitussive effect (42 +/- 8% inhibition) of Ro-64-6198 (3 mg/kg) was observed at 1 h after i.p. administration. Also at 1 h after administration, Ro-64-6198 (0.003-3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a dose-dependent inhibition of cough. The antitussive effect of Ro-64-6198 (3 mg/kg, i.p.) was blocked by J113397 (12 mg/kg, i.p.) but not by the classical opioid antagonist naltrexone (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Although the antitussive action of Ro-64-6198 may be mediated by a central and/or a peripheral site of action, we hypothesize that selective oral NOP agonists that do not penetrate the blood-brain barrier may provide a novel approach for the treatment of cough. Moreover, because these drugs do not interact at MOP receptors, they may be devoid of codeine-like side effects such as respiratory depression, sedation, constipation or proclivities for addictive liabilities.

Anandamide induces cough in conscious guinea-pigs through VR1 receptors.

1. Endogenous neuronal lipid mediator anandamide, which can be synthesized in the lung, is a ligand of both cannabinoid (CB) and vanilloid receptors (VR). The tussigenic effect of anandamide has not been studied. The current study was designed to test the direct tussigenic effect of anandamide in conscious guinea-pigs, and its effect on VR1 receptor function in isolated primary guinea-pig nodose ganglia neurons. 2. Anandamide (0.3-3 mg.ml(-1)), when given by aerosol, induced cough in conscious guinea-pigs in a concentration dependent manner. When guinea-pigs were pretreated with capsazepine, a VR1 antagonist, the anandamide-induced cough was significantly inhibited. Pretreatment with CB1 (SR 141716A) and CB2 (SR 144528) antagonists had no effect on anandamide-induced cough. These results indicate that anandamide-induced cough is mediated through the activation of VR1 receptors. 3. Anandamide (10-100 micro M) increased intracellular Ca(2+) concentration estimated by Fluo-4 fluorescence change in isolated guinea-pig nodose ganglia cells. The anandamide-induced Ca(2+) response was inhibited by two different VR1 antagonists: capsazepine (1 micro M) and iodo-resiniferatoxin (I-RTX, 0.1 micro M), indicating that anandamide-induced Ca(2+) response was through VR1 channel activation. In contrast, the CB1 (SR 141716A, 1 micro M) and CB2 (SR 144528, 0.1 micro M) receptor antagonists had no effect on Ca(2+) response to anandamide. 4. In conclusion, these results provide evidence that anandamide activates native vanilloid receptors in isolated guinea-pig nodose ganglia cells and induces cough through activation of VR1 receptors.

Antitussive effect of nociceptin/orphanin FQ in experimental cough models.

Cough is an important defensive pulmonary reflex that removes irritants, fluids or foreign materials from the airways. However, often cough is non-productive and requires suppression. Opioid mu receptor agonists, such as codeine are commonly used as antitussive agents and are among the most widely administered drugs in the world. Codeine suppresses the responsiveness of one or more components of the central reflex pathway for cough and is an efficacious antitussive drug for cough due to diverse aetiologies. However, opioids produce side effects that include sedation, addiction potential and constipation. Therefore, novel cough suppressant therapies should maintain or improve upon the antitussive efficacy profile of opioids. Moreover, these novel therapies should have a safety profile significantly better than current antitussive therapies. Presently, we discuss preclinical findings showing that activation of the 'opioid-like' receptor (NOP(1)) inhibits cough in the guinea pig and cat.

Characterization of nasal obstruction in the allergic guinea pig using the forced oscillation method.

INTRODUCTION: This is the first report to evaluate changes in nasal resistance in a preclinical animal model using the forced oscillation method. METHODS: The method involves characterizing pressure-flow relationships of the respiratory system due to external oscillatory forces. RESULTS: First, we evaluated changes in nasal resistance using an established small-animal rhinometric technique. In these studies, aerosolized ovalbumin (3%) administered to the nasal cavity of ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs increased nasal resistance at 30 min by 99 +/- 14%. The histamine H1 antagonists, chlorpheniramine (1 mg/kg i.v.) and pyrilamine (1 mg/kg i.v.), blocked the increase in nasal resistance due to ovalbumin provocation (50 +/- 17% and 39 +/- 11% over baseline, respectively). The alpha-adrenergic agonist phenylpropanolamine (3 mg/ kg i.v.) had no effect on the nasal actions of ovalbumin. In separate studies, nasal resistance was measured at 2 Hz by forced oscillation and ovalbumin (3%) increased nasal resistance by 91 +/- 14%. Chlorpheniramine (1 mg/kg i.v.) significantly attenuated the increase in nasal resistance due to ovalbumin. Finally, changes in nasal resistance for each treatment group were evaluated at frequencies of 1 - 18 Hz. Area under the curve analysis demonstrated that chlorpheniramine blocked the nasal obstructive effect of ovalbumin. In contrast, a pharmacologically active dose of phenylpropanolamine (3 mg/kg i.v.) did not produce decongestant activity. DISCUSSION: The current data are inconsistent with the well-established clinical efficacy of alpha-adrenergic agonists as nasal decongestants. Consequently, we suggest that allergic nasal obstruction in the guinea pig may not be the best preclinical approach to assess the nasal decongestant activity of vasoconstrictor alpha-adrenergic agonists. Additionally, our studies demonstrate the utility of the forced oscillation technique in assessing changes in nasal resistance in small laboratory animals.