Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 14(4): 403-15, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22493792

ABSTRACT

AIM: End-stage renal failure (ESRF) and renal transplant recipients are thought to be associated with an increased risk of colorectal complications. METHOD: A review of the literature was performed to assess the prevalence and outcome in both benign and malignant colorectal disease. RESULTS: No prospective randomized studies assessing colorectal complications in ESRF or renal transplant were identified. Case series and case reports have described the incidence and management of benign colorectal complications. Complications included diverticulitis,infective colitis, colonic bleeding and colonic perforation. There was insufficient evidence to associated iverticular disease with adult polycystic kidney disease.Three population-based studies have shown up to a twofold increased incidence of colonic cancer but not rectal cancer for renal transplant recipients. Bowel cancer screening (as per the general population) by faecal occult blood testing appears justified for renal transplant patients; however, evidence suggests that consideration of starting screening at a younger age may be worthwhile because of an increased risk of developing colonic cancer.Two population-based studies have shown a threefold and 10-fold increased incidence of anal cancer for renal transplant recipients. A single case­control study demonstrated significant increased prevalence of anal human papilloma virus (HPV) and intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN)in patients with established renal transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of high-level evidence,ESRF and renal transplantation were associated with colorectal complications that could result in major morbidity and mortality. Bowel cancer screening in this patient group appears justified. The effectiveness of screening for HPV, AIN and anal cancer in renal transplant recipients remains unclear.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/etiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Transplantation , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Diseases/etiology , Colonic Diseases/diagnosis , Colonic Diseases/epidemiology , Colonic Diseases/therapy , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prevalence , Rectal Diseases/diagnosis , Rectal Diseases/epidemiology , Rectal Diseases/therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Transplant Proc ; 42(5): 1654-8, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20620494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Living donor kidney transplants with multiple arteries are presumed to be associated with an increased risk of complications. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes in living donor transplantation with the specific intention of comparing long-term outcomes in which the donor kidney had 1 or more renal arteries. The study was undertaken in 2 large transplant centers. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 201 living donor kidney transplants with multiple arteries that were performed between January 1985 and December 2004 was undertaken. We recorded patient and graft survivals, urological and vascular complications. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated, and 2-tailed Student t-test was used to compare outcomes. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Graft and patient survival at 1 year were 93% and 97% and at 5 years were 87% and 92%. The most common complications were vascular (8.9%), followed by urological (6%), acute tubular necrosis (5.5%), and posttransplant hypertension (4.0%). There was significantly higher incidence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) in multiple-artery transplants. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients studied, apart from a higher incidence of ATN and vascular complications, it appears that the number of renal arteries did not have any adverse impact on the outcomes. The findings from this study suggest that live donor kidneys with multiple renal arteries can be safely utilized for renal transplantation.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data , Renal Artery/surgery , Cohort Studies , Creatinine/blood , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Kidney Tubular Necrosis, Acute/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/classification , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Renal Artery/abnormalities , Renal Artery/anatomy & histology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Diseases/epidemiology , Urologic Diseases/etiology
3.
J Urol ; 177(6): 2260-4; discussion 2264, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17509336

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized, prospective trial to compare the incidence of early urological complications and health care expenditures in renal transplant recipients with or without ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients receiving a renal transplant at a single center were randomized preoperatively to undergo Double-J stent or no-stent ureterovesical anastomosis from November 1998 to October 2001. Early urological mechanical complications were recorded, including urinary leakage or obstruction, or urinary tract infections within 3 months of transplantation. Direct health care costs associated with stenting, urological complications and urinary tract infection management were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized to a stent (112) and a no-stent (89) group. In the no-stent group 11 patients received a stent due to intraoperative findings and were excluded from study. At 3 months there were significantly more cases of urinary leakage (8.9% vs 0.9%, p <0.008) and ureteral obstruction (7.7 % vs 0%, p <0.004) in the no-stent than in the stent group. Mean time of stent removal was 74.3 days. A significant increase in urinary tract infections was observed when stent was left greater than 30 days after transplantation compared to the rate in the no-stent group (p <0.02). An additional cost of 151 UK pounds per patient was incurred in the no-stent group vs the stent group. CONCLUSIONS: Using a ureteral stent at renal transplantation significantly decreases the early urinary complications of urine leakage and obstruction. However, there is a significant increase in urinary tract infections, primarily beyond 30 days after transplantation. Stent removal within 4 weeks of insertion appears advisable.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/instrumentation , Stents , Ureter/surgery , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Urologic Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomosis, Surgical/economics , Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Costs , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
4.
Transplant Proc ; 36(9): 2689-91, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15621125

ABSTRACT

The major adverse effect of azathioprine is its myelotoxicity, with leukocytes being affected more commonly than the other bone marrow elements. Although megaloblastic change is frequent, reportedly seen in 16% to 82% of bone marrow aspirates, long-term use of azathioprine rarely causes severe anemia. We report a case of refractory pure red cell aplasia resulting from long-term use of azathioprine in a renal transplant recipient and examine the possible underlying mechanisms. There was no response to dose reduction or to erythropoietin administration. However, there was immediate recovery after complete drug withdrawal. A review of the literature revealed that only ten cases of azathioprine-induced red cell aplasia have so far been described, all in transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Azathioprine/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Red-Cell Aplasia, Pure/chemically induced , Creatinine/metabolism , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Urol ; 170(5): 1727-30, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14532763

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Congenital and acquired conditions of the lower urinary tract can lead to renal failure requiring transplantation. Under these circumstances transplantation into a urinary diversion or an augmented bladder may be the only option. We report our experience with renal transplantation into ileal conduits in the last 22 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1980 and August 2002, 59 renal transplants were drained into an ileal conduit in 54 patients at our center, accounting for 2.3% of the total number of transplants during this period. Median patient age was 28 years (range 1 to 63) and 13 patients were children. There were 12 living related and 47 cadaveric kidneys transplanted. Spina bifida, the most common cause of end stage renal disease, was seen in 22 patients (41%). Patient and graft survival following transplantation into an ileal conduit were compared with that in the 2,579 other transplants done at this center between January 1980 and December 2001. RESULTS: Actuarial graft survival was 90% at 1 year, 63% at 5 years, 52% at 10 years and 52% at 15 years. Actuarial patient survival was 95% at 1 year, 83% at 5 years, 69% at 10 years and 69% at 15 years. Graft and patient survival was statistically similar to the outcome of the 2,579 other transplants done at our center between January 1980 and December 2001. At a mean followup of 4.6 years (range 0.1 to 20) mean serum creatinine in the 39 functioning grafts was 156 mmol/l. Of the surgical complications 21% were directly attributable to the ileal conduit and it could be considered a risk factor contributing to the complication in a further 39%. Symptomatic urinary tract infection was noted in 65% of the patients, although it did not lead to graft loss. At followup 7 patients had died with a functioning graft. Grafts were lost due to chronic allograft nephropathy in 3 cases, renal artery stenosis in 2, renal vein thrombosis in 2, and acute severe rejection, staghorn calculus and ureteroileal stricture in 1 each. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplant drainage into an ileal conduit for urinary diversion is an effective treatment for patients with end stage renal disease due to abnormal lower urinary tracts. Despite preexisting co-morbidity and the increased complication rate long-term graft and patient survival is comparable to that in the normal transplant population.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/methods , Urinary Diversion/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival/physiology , Humans , Ileum/surgery , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Survival Rate
7.
J Clin Pathol ; 53(9): 720-1, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11041066

ABSTRACT

Primary hyperoxaluria is a rare genetic disorder characterised by calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis leading to renal failure, often with extra-renal oxalate deposition (systemic oxalosis). Although ischaemic complications of crystal deposition in vessel walls are well recognised clinically, these usually take the form of peripheral limb or cutaneous ischaemia. This paper documents the first reported case of fatal intestinal infarction in a 49 year old woman with systemic oxalosis and advocates its consideration in the differential diagnosis of an acute abdomen in such patients.


Subject(s)
Hyperoxaluria, Primary/complications , Infarction/etiology , Intestine, Small/blood supply , Abdomen, Acute/etiology , Fatal Outcome , Female , Humans , Infarction/pathology , Intestine, Small/pathology , Middle Aged
8.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 14(7): 1692-7, 1999 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10435878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Banff classification of renal allograft rejection grades acute tubulointerstitial rejection (AIR) by severity of tubulitis and acute vascular rejection (AVR) by severity of arteritis. The intensity of tubulitis has not, however, been demonstrated to be of prognostic value and other features such as glomerulitis and eosinophil infiltration are of uncertain significance. This study was performed in order to determine the clinical value of this pathological classification. METHODS: Banff criteria were correlated with outcome in 134 consecutive graft recipients transplanted in our unit over a 3-year period (1994 1996) who experienced at least one biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episode. Of 197 biopsies performed for the diagnosis of rejection, 177 contained at least one artery and were suitable for Banff grading. Tissue eosinophil counts were available for 101 biopsies. Clinical severity of rejection was classified as mild (fully responsive to pulse steroid therapy), moderate (partially steroid responsive) and severe (steroid unresponsive/requiring ATG therapy). RESULTS: Graft failure ensued in 18 of 58 patients with AVR compared with 10 of 65 patients with AIR (P= < 0.05). Clinical severity of rejection correlated with the presence of arteritis, but not severity of tubulitis; rejections graded I, IIA and IIB according to the Banff' 93 classification were clinically severe in 3/68 (4%), 2/28 (7%) and 15/67 (22%) respectively (P= <0.05). The presence of glomerulitis showed no correlation with clinical severity or graft loss. Tissue eosinophilia (>10 eosinophils/mm2) was present in 18 of 33 patients who had at least one episode of AVR (v1/2), compared with 11 of 45 patients who suffered only AIR (P= <0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that: arteritis, but not severe tubulitis or glomerulitis, is an adverse prognostic factor in acute rejection and that tissue eosinophilia is associated with vascular rejection. Our findings support the 1997 revision of the Banff classification, replacing grades with types of acute rejection.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/pathology , Kidney Transplantation , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers , Biopsy , Eosinophilia/etiology , Female , Graft Rejection/complications , Humans , Kidney/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
9.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 13(7): 1799-803, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9681731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dialysis can be life-saving for patients with end-stage renal failure. However, not only is it associated with significant morbidity and a greater mortality than transplantation, but it is also expensive. Therefore renal transplantation is generally regarded as the treatment of choice for patients in whom this form of renal replacement therapy is appropriate. Transplantation usually takes place after a variable period of dialytic therapy, but pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PKT) has established itself as an attractive alternative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1463 consecutive first kidney transplants performed between January 1980 and December 1995 in a single centre were analysed. The 161 patients (11%) transplanted without prior dialysis were compared with the 1302 patients who had been dialysed prior to being transplanted. The pre-emptive group did not differ from the dialysis group in respect of donor age, donor and recipient gender, HLA mismatch, or cold ischaemic time, although there were more live donor transplants within the pre-emptive group. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred more frequently in the dialysis group (25% vs 16%) but more patients experienced an acute rejection episode in the pre-emptive group (67 vs 55%). The actuarial graft survival in the pre-emptive group at 1, 5, and 10 years (84, 76 and 67%) was significantly higher than the respective values in the dialysis group (83, 69, and 56%). Within the live donor recipient cohort the survival advantage for the pre-emptive group was even more striking. CONCLUSION: Pre-emptive kidney transplantation not only avoids the risks, cost, and inconvenience of dialysis, but is also associated with better graft survival than transplantation after a period of dialysis, particularly within the live donor cohort.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Cadaver , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/physiology , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Peritoneal Dialysis , Renal Dialysis , Time Factors
10.
Transpl Int ; 11 Suppl 1: S5-9, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9664933

ABSTRACT

The association between acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the development of chronic rejection has been the subject of much debate. Studies have suggested that the two phenomena may be linked, or, conversely that there may be no association at all. In order to clarify this relationship the outcome of 284 renal allografts were examined. The transplants were all performed at a single institution between April 1989 and December 1991, allowing a minimum follow up of 5 years. ACR was classified into three clinical response groups: (1) fully responsive to therapy (type 1 ACR), (2) partially responsive (type 2) and (3) ACR requiring treatment with ATG or OKT3 (type 3). Acute and chronic rejection were determined by histological (Banff) criteria. Chronic transplant nephropathy (CTN) occurred significantly more frequently in those with late ACR after day 60 than in those who had early rejection (53.5% versus 17.3%, respectively, P < 0.00001). Acute rejection that was fully responsive to therapy (type 1) had no association with CTN, but partially responsive rejection and rejection requiring second-line treatment were both significantly associated with CTN (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively). This study suggests that it is the clinical behaviour and response to treatment of ACR that is paramount in determining the onset of chronic rejection, and not hte mere presence or absence of the clinical phenomenon.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Kidney Diseases , Kidney Transplantation , Acute Disease , Chronic Disease , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Diseases/drug therapy , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Muromonab-CD3/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
11.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 80(2): 125-30, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9623379

ABSTRACT

A prospective comparison of metabolic and inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia operations was undertaken. There were 10 patients in each group. Plasma levels of cortisol, growth hormone, prolactin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured preoperatively and at fixed intervals up to 120 h postoperatively. In vitro, endotoxin stimulated whole blood tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) was measured in preoperative and 24 h postoperative blood samples. Changes in the plasma levels of cortisol, growth hormone and prolactin showed no statistically significant difference between the groups. No significant change in IL-6 levels were recorded in any group. Changes in CRP levels were significantly higher (P < 0.006) in open hernia patients. Endotoxin stimulated TNF alpha production was suppressed in both groups. The degree of suppression in open hernia patients was significantly higher (P < 0.005). This study has shown that both these operations produce similar stress responses. However, open hernia operation results in a higher acute phase response and induces a greater endotoxin tolerance.


Subject(s)
Acute-Phase Reaction/etiology , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications , Stress, Physiological/etiology , Adult , Aged , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Endotoxins/pharmacology , Female , Growth Hormone/blood , Humans , Hydrocortisone/blood , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/blood , Prolactin/blood , Prospective Studies , Stress, Physiological/blood , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/biosynthesis
14.
Transplantation ; 61(5): 709-14, 1996 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8607172

ABSTRACT

Univariate and multivariate analyses have been performed on donor an d recipient variables to determine possible effects on the outcome of 516 primary cadaveric renal transplants performed in our single center from 1989 until 1993. The overall actuarial patient survival at 1 year and 5 years was 94.4% and 87.4%, respectively; the 1 year and 5 year graft survival rates were 88.3% and 77.8%, respectively. A total of 95 grafts were lost; death with function (35%) and chronic rejection (22%) were the major causes. Three variables (HLA-DR mismatch, delayed graft function, and prolonged cold ischemia time) had a significant detrimental effect on both short- and long-term graft survival. Zero HLA-DR mismatched grafts showed significantly enhanced survival over those with 1 HLA-DR mismatch both at 1 year (92.8% vs. 84.5%) and at 5 years (88.3% vs. 73.9%) only if cold ischemia time was less than 26 hours (P=0.0009). Occurrence of delayed graft function significantly lowered graft survival at both 1 year and 5 years (P=0.002), and the incidence was significantly associated with prolonged cold ischemia time (P<0.0001). HLA-A or HLA-B matching, percentage panel reactive antibodies (PRA), and anastomosis time showed no independent effect on long-term survival. The small number of 2 HLA-DR mismatched grafts (n=6) precluded separate analysis of this group. Acute rejection accounted for 12% of losses but had no statistically significant effect on graft survival, even though an increased frequency of rejection episodes was significantly associated with HLA-DR mismatch (P<0.0001). These results would suggest that significant survival benefits may be achieved by prospective HLA matching if cold ischemia times are limited. The efficiency of organ sharing must he improved to make optimal use of a limited resource.


Subject(s)
HLA-DR Antigens/immunology , Kidney Transplantation , Organ Preservation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cadaver , Child , Child, Preschool , Cold Temperature , Graft Rejection , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Time Factors
16.
Transplantation ; 59(9): 1285-93, 1995 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7762063

ABSTRACT

The perfusion of kidneys with anti-CD45 monoclonal antibodies prior to transplantation offers a means of targeting passenger antigen-presenting cells with the aim of reducing the subsequent incidence of rejection episodes. A safety study was performed in humans of such pretreatment in 40 unsensitized recipients of first cadaveric renal grafts, who were followed for 3 months after transplantation. A 50-ml solution containing 2 mg of each of the rat anti-CD45 mAbs YTH 24.5 and YTH 54.12 was injected into the allograft renal artery ex vivo and just before transplantation while the renal vein was kept clamped. No patients died, but 4 grafts were lost. Two were lost due to primary nonfunction, 1 was lost because of late renal artery thrombosis, and 1 was lost to rejection. There were no cases of renal vein thrombosis and 1 trivial renal artery stenosis, and only 2 patients produced human anti-rat antibodies. Between 63.5% and 100% (median 96.4%) of CD45+ cells in the postperfusion biopsies were coated with anti-CD45 as determined by double-immunolabeling. The number of patients experiencing rejection episodes was inversely associated with this "antibody uptake": 75% of the low uptake group (< 95%) had at least 1 rejection episode, compared with 22% of the high uptake group (> or = 95%) (P = 0.001). The complement components C3 and C5b-9 colocalized with perfused anti-CD45 in 32/33 (97.0%) and 11/33 (33.3%) of the biopsy specimens, respectively. We conclude that: (1) this technique appears free of adverse effects, (2) high antibody uptake within the kidney is associated with a lower incidence of rejection, and (3) the antibodies used fix and activate complement in vivo.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney/immunology , Leukocyte Common Antigens/immunology , Adult , Aged , Antigen Presentation , Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion , Complement C3/immunology , Complement Fixation Tests , Female , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Transplantation, Homologous
18.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 10 Suppl 1: 32-5, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7617279

ABSTRACT

The loss of a graft in the first few days or weeks of transplantation is a devastating event for the patient and his surgeon. Historically, many early losses were related to hyperacute or aggressive acute rejection, but many centres now find that this is a diminishing cause of graft loss. The role of graft thrombosis has now become a leading cause of such early graft loss. Many centres are now reporting 1-year graft survival rates of the order of 90-95%, and under these conditions are finding that most of the 5-10% lost are thrombosed grafts. The keys to prevention are clearly multifactorial and include careful preparation of the donor, adequate hydration of the recipient, meticulous attention to anatomical and surgical details, the reduction of delayed graft function, and the realization that the non-functioning graft has a high likelihood of being the target of insidious acute allograft rejection. In practical terms, we should ensure that all transplant surgery is done by the most technically capable surgeons, and we should strive to reduce the anastamosis time to below or around 30 min [8]. There is often little justification for anastamosis times in excess of 60 min except for surgical inexperience. Further, there are growing data to suggest that we should no longer be complacent about the apparent length of cold ischaemia that we allow. Perhaps the time has come for renal transplant surgeons to get out of their beds and reduce the maximum cold ischaemia to below 24 h--surely not too onerous a task?(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Graft Survival , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/etiology , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival/drug effects , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Renal Insufficiency/surgery , Thrombosis/etiology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...