Mortality in diabetes: pancreas transplantation is associated with significant survival benefit.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplantation in complicated type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus improves the quality of life, increases longevity and stabilizes diabetic complications. There may be clinician reticence due to perceived poor outcomes with published associated mortality rates of 5-8% due to significant co-morbidities, particularly cardiovascular impairment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing pancreas transplantation in a single centre since the programme's initiation [simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) = 148, pancreas after kidney (PAK) = 33 and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) = 11] compared with a control group accepted contemporaneously onto the waiting list. The primary endpoint was patient mortality. The risk factors including medical and diabetic history, demographics, transplant type and waiting time were analysed. RESULTS: The waiting list mortality was 30% (35 of 120) compared with a mortality of 9% (20 of 193) post-transplantation (P < 0.001). Deaths on the waiting list compared with transplantation up to 1 year had a relative risk of 2.67 (95% CI: 0.81-3.51; P = 0.19), whilst those surviving >1 year had a relative risk of 5.89 of dying on the waiting list (95% CI: 1.70-3.20; P < 0.0005). There were no differences in terms of cardiovascular or renal-associated risk factors, nor in other potential confounding factors other than duration of diabetes (P = 0.02). Median survival from listing was shorter in younger patients (<50; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 diabetics with renal failure listed for pancreas transplantation are at a significant risk of mortality even without surgery. Transplantation offers considerable survival benefits, despite associated surgical and immunosuppressive risks. In selected patients, pancreas transplantation remains the benchmark treatment for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Native nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: before or after kidney transplantation?

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (case series). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? The indications and timing of native nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is controversial, especially for those undergoing renal transplantation. Post-transplant unilateral native nephrectomy appears to be the preferred intervention compared to pre-transplant native nephrectomy. There seems to be substantial additive risk to bilateral over unilateral nephrectomy, especially prior to transplantation. Pre-transplant native nephrectomy should only be carried out when there are clear indications such as massive size preventing allograft placement, severe pain, early satiety, recurrent bleeding and infections, or suspected malignancy. OBJECTIVE: To analyse indications, timing and outcomes of native nephrectomy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients listed for kidney transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all ADPKD patients who had a native nephrectomy prior to or following transplantation between January 2003 and December 2009 at a single centre, including those undergoing the sandwich technique (removal of the most severely affected native kidney prior to transplantation, and the other afterwards), was undertaken. RESULTS: There were 35 individuals in our cohort (M : F = 16 : 19), with a median age of 51.5 years (range 43-65). Twenty patients were in the pre-transplant nephrectomy group, 12 in the post-transplant group, and three underwent the sandwich technique. Indications for nephrectomy varied but were most commonly pain/discomfort, space for transplantation, ongoing haematuria, recurrent infections, and gastrointestinal pressure symptoms (early satiety). Seven individuals in the pre-transplant group and three in the post-transplant group required critical care admission after nephrectomy. Transient renal graft dysfunction occurred in two post-transplant bilateral nephrectomy patients. Two patients in the bilateral nephrectomy pre-transplant group and one in the bilateral nephrectomy post-transplant group died in the immediate post-operative period. No complications were noted in the sandwich technique group. CONCLUSION: Native nephrectomy in ADPKD is a major undertaking associated with significant morbidity especially in the pre-transplant group. Post-transplant unilateral nephrectomy appears to be the safest approach with fewest complications.

Multicenter, randomized study of the effectiveness of basiliximab in avoiding addition of steroids to cyclosporine a monotherapy in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Steroid therapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and well-documented adverse effects, but two thirds of patients initiated on monotherapy with cyclosporine A (CsA) microemulsion require addition of steroids. METHODS: In this 12-month randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 108 renal transplant recipients were randomized and received basiliximab (n=52) or placebo (n=56) to assess whether basiliximab reduces the need for addition of steroids or other adjunctive immunosuppressive drugs to CsA monotherapy. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of the study (requirement for additional immunosuppression at 12 months posttransplant) occurred significantly less frequently with basiliximab (54%) than placebo (73%) (P=0.046). By the end of the study, 25% of basiliximab-treated patients were receiving maintenance steroids versus 61% of placebo-treated patients (P=0.0006). During the trial, 33% of basiliximab-treated patients received oral steroids at some time compared with 61% of placebo-treated patients (P=0.004). The proportion of patients experiencing biopsy-proven rejection was not significantly different between the basiliximab (29%) and placebo (43%) groups (P=0.16). Median serum creatinine at 12 months was 141 mumol/L with basiliximab and 164 mumol/L with placebo (not significant). One-year graft and patient survivals were 88% and 98% for basiliximab and 88% and 96% for placebo (not significant), respectively. Adverse events were similar in the basiliximab and placebo treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that the addition of basiliximab significantly reduces the need to modify the initial treatment regimen in patients scheduled to receive steroid-free CsA therapy, suggesting that basiliximab induction may be useful as a strategy in other steroid-avoidance regimens.