Long-term outcomes of early compared to late onset choledochocholedochal anastomotic strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary stricture (ABS) after liver transplantation (LT) has been proven to be effective and safe, but long-term outcomes of early compared to late onset ABS have not been studied. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcome of early ABS to late ABS. METHODS: Of the 806 adult LT recipients (04/2006-12/2012), 93 patients met the criteria for inclusion, and were grouped into non-ABS (no stenosis on ERCP, n=41), early ABS (stenosis <90 days after LT, 18 [19.3%]), and late ABS (stenosis ≥90 days after LT, 34 [36.5%]). A propensity matched control group for the ABS group (n=42) was obtained matched for outcome variables for age, gender, and calculated MELD score at listing. RESULTS: Mean number of ERCPs (2.33±1.3 vs 2.56±1.5, P=.69) were comparable between the groups; however, significantly better long-term resolution of the stricture was noted in the early ABS group (94.44% vs 67.65%, P=.04). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed worst survival in the early ABS group compared to the non-ABS, late ABS, and control groups (P=.0001). CONCLUSION: LT recipients with early ABS have inferior graft survival despite better response to endoscopic intervention.

Do medicine residents triage patients with gastrointestinal bleeding appropriately?

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal specialists depend on internal medicine (IM) teams to accurately identify acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We evaluated whether IM residents' assessment of GIB correlated with the impressions of GI specialists during consultations at an inner-city university teaching hospital. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to house staff requesting GIB consultations and to the GI fellows performing the consults between August 2011 and April 2012. Residents and fellows were asked to assess GIB, specifically melena, using a stool color card and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings. Fellow DRE findings served as controls for stool color identification. RESULTS: Eighty-seven GI consults were eligible for the study. Residents and fellows completed 81 and 86 questionnaires, respectively. A total of 76 questionnaires were included for analysis. A DRE was performed by medical staff before calling a consult in 65% of cases compared with fellows (97% of cases, P = 0.0001). Residents more frequently labeled stool as melena (42%) in patients as compared with fellows (12%, P = 0.0001). Residents inaccurately identified melenic stools in 22 patients (11 based on stool color and 11 based on DRE findings). Residents were more likely to label a consult as emergent than fellows (13.5% vs 4%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Residents are less likely to perform DRE during an evaluation for GIB and to accurately identify melena based on stool color or DRE findings. There appears to be a need to educate residents on the appropriate terminology for stool color and the importance of DRE to accurately triage patients with acute GIBs.

A rare case of myeloid sarcoma presenting as an anorectal ulcer.

Myeloid Sarcoma is a rare tumor composed of myeloblasts occurring at an extramedullary site like bones, or various soft tissues. Myeloid sarcoma may involve the gastrointestinal tract very rarely either solitarily, or occurring simultaneously with acute myeloid leukemia. Its diagnosis is challenging and needs biopsy and immunohistochemical staining. We are describing a case of myeloid sarcoma which presented as a painful anal ulcer mimicking an atypical fissure. Its appearance resembled crohn's disease on sigmoidoscopy. A biopsy of the ulcer along with histochemical staining led to the diagnosis of myeloid sarcoma. Our case demonstrates the need for aggressive evaluation of any common gastrointestinal complaint with an atypical presentation.