Sex and the facilitation of cued fear by prior contextual fear conditioning in rats.

Previous studies have shown that the formation of new memories can be influenced by prior experience. This includes work using pavlovian fear conditioning in rodents that have shown that an initial fear conditioning experience can become associated with and facilitate the acquisition of new fear memories, especially when they occur close together in time. However, most of the prior studies used only males as subjects resulting in questions about the generalizability of the findings from this work. Here we tested whether prior contextual fear conditioning would facilitate later learning of cued fear conditioning in both male and female rats, and if there were differences based on the interval between the two conditioning episodes. Our results showed that levels of cued fear were not influenced by prior contextual fear conditioning or by the interval between training, however, females showed lower levels of cued fear. Freezing behavior in the initial training context differed by sex, with females showing lower levels of contextual fear, and by the type of initial training, with rats given delayed shock showing higher levels of fear than rats given immediate shock during contextual fear conditioning. These results indicate that contextual fear conditioning does not prime subsequent cued fear conditioning and that female rats express lower levels of cued and contextual fear conditioning than males.

Sex difference in the facilitation of fear learning by prior fear conditioning.

There is now ample evidence that the strength and underlying mechanisms of memory formation can be drastically altered by prior experience. However, the prior work using rodent models on this topic has used only males as subjects, and as a result, we do know whether or not the effects of prior experience on subsequent learning are similar in both sexes. As a first step towards addressing this shortcoming, rats of both sexes were given auditory fear conditioning, or fear conditioning with unsignaled shocks, followed an hour or a day later by a single pairing of light and shock. Fear memory for each experience was assessed by measuring freezing behavior to the auditory cue and fear-potentiated startle to the light. Results showed that males trained with auditory fear conditioning showed facilitated learning to the subsequent visual fear conditioning session when the two training sessions were separated by one hour or one day. Females showed evidence of facilitation in rats given auditory conditioning when they were spaced by an hour but not when they were spaced by one day. Contextual fear conditioning did not support the facilitation of subsequent learning under any conditions. These results indicate that the mechanism by which prior fear conditioning facilitates subsequent learning differs between sexes, and they set the stage for mechanistic studies to understand the neurobiological basis of this sex difference.

Sex difference in the facilitation of fear learning by prior fear conditioning.

There is now ample evidence that the strength and underlying mechanisms of memory formation can be drastically altered by prior experience. However, the prior work using rodent models on this topic has used only males as subjects, and as a result, we do know whether or not the effects of prior experience on subsequent learning are similar in both sexes. As a first step towards addressing this shortcoming rats of both sexes were given auditory fear conditioning, or fear conditioning with unsignaled shocks, followed an hour or a day later by a single pairing of light and shock. Fear memory for each experience was assessed by measuring freezing behavior to the auditory cue and fear-potentiated startle to the light. Results showed that males trained with auditory fear conditioning showed facilitated learning to the subsequent visual fear conditioning session when the two training sessions were separated by one hour or one day. Females showed evidence of facilitation in rats given auditory conditioning when they were spaced by an hour, but not when they were spaced by one day. Contextual fear conditioning did not support the facilitation of subsequent learning under any conditions. These results indicate that the mechanism by which prior fear conditioning facilitates subsequent learning differs between sexes, and they set the stage for mechanistic studies to understand the neurobiological basis of this sex difference.

Neural activity in afferent projections to the infralimbic cortex is associated with individual differences in the recall of fear extinction.

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is characterized by an impaired ability to extinguish fear responses to trauma-associated cues. Studies in humans and non-human animals point to differences in the engagement of certain frontal cortical regions as key mediators determining whether or not fear extinction is successful, however the neural circuit interactions that dictate the differential involvement of these regions are not well understood. To better understand how individual differences in extinction recall are reflected in differences in neural circuit activity, we labeled projections to the infralimbic cortex (IL) in rats using a retrograde tracer and compared neural activity within, and outside, of IL-projecting neurons. We analyzed these data in groups separated on the basis of how well rats retained extinction memory. We found that within IL-projecting cells, neurons in the posterior paraventricular thalamus showed heightened activity in rats that showed good extinction recall. Outside of the IL-projecting cells, increased Fos activity was observed in good extinction rats in select regions of the claustrum and ventral hippocampus. Our results indicate that differences in extinction recall are associated with a specific pattern of neural activity both within and outside of projections to the IL.

Behavioral Expression of Contextual Fear in Male and Female Rats.

The study of fear conditioning has led to a better understanding of fear and anxiety-based disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite the fact many of these disorders are more common in women than in men, the vast majority of work investigating fear conditioning in rodents has been conducted in males. The goal of the work presented here was to better understand how biological sex affects contextual fear conditioning and expression. To this end, rats of both sexes were trained to fear a specific context and fear responses were measured upon re-exposure to the conditioning context. In the first experiment, male and female rats were given context fear conditioning and tested the next day during which freezing behavior was measured. In the second experiment, rats were trained and tested in a similar fashion while fear-potentiated startle and defecation were measured. We found that males showed more freezing behavior than females during a fear expression test. The expression of fear-potentiated startle did not differ between sexes, while males exhibited more defecation during a test in a novel context. These data suggest that the expression of defensive behavior differs between sexes and highlight the importance of using multiple measures of fear when comparing between sexes.

Morphological Responses of Excitatory Prelimbic and Orbitofrontal Cortical Neurons to Excess Corticosterone in Adolescence and Acute Stress in Adulthood.

Considerable evidence indicates that chronic stress and excess glucocorticoids induce neuronal remodeling in prefrontal cortical (PFC) regions. Adolescence is also characterized by a structural reorganization of PFC neurons, yet interactions between stress- and age-related structural plasticity are still being determined. We quantified dendritic spine densities on apical dendrites of excitatory neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex, prelimbic subregion (PL). Densities decreased across adolescent development, as expected, and spine volume increased. Unexpectedly, exposure to excess corticosterone (CORT) throughout adolescence did not cause additional dendritic spine loss detectable in adulthood. As a positive control dendrite population expected to be sensitive to CORT, we imaged neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), confirming CORT-induced dendritic spine attrition on basal arbors of layer V neurons. We next assessed the effects of acute, mild stress in adulthood: On PL neurons, an acute stressor increased the density of mature, mushroom-shaped spines. Meanwhile, on OFC neurons, dendritic spine volumes and lengths were lower in mice exposed to both CORT and an acute stressor (also referred to as a "double hit"). In sum, prolonged exposure to excess glucocorticoids during adolescence can have morphological and also metaplastic consequences, but they are not global. Anatomical considerations are discussed.

Subthreshold Fear Conditioning Produces a Rapidly Developing Neural Mechanism that Primes Subsequent Learning.

Learning results in various forms of neuronal plasticity that provide a lasting representation of past events, and understanding the mechanisms supporting lasting memories has been a primary pursuit of the neurobiological study of memory. However, learning also alters the capacity for future learning, an observation that likely reflects its adaptive significance. In the laboratory, we can study this essential property of memory by assessing how prior experience alters the capacity for subsequent learning. Previous studies have indicated that while a single weak fear conditioning trial is insufficient to support long-term memory (LTM), it can facilitate future learning such that another trial delivered within a protracted time window results in a robust memory. Here, we sought to determine whether or not manipulating neural activity in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) using designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) during or after the initial learning trial would affect the ability of the initial trial to facilitate subsequent learning. Our results show that inhibiting the BLA in rats prior to the first trial prevented the ability of that trial to facilitate learning when a second trial was presented the next day. Inhibition of the BLA immediately after the first trial using DREADDs was not effective, nor was pharmacological inhibition of protein kinase A (PKA) or the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). These findings indicate that the neural mechanisms that permit an initial subthreshold fear conditioning trial to alter later learning develop rapidly and do not appear to require a typical post-learning consolidation period.

Gonadal hormone fluctuations do not affect the expression or extinction of fear-potentiated startle in female rats.

Prior studies suggest that levels of ovarian hormones may affect learning and memory in rats, including studies of fear conditioning and extinction. We previously showed that female rats show reduced retention of extinction compared to males when measuring fear-potentiated startle, but not when measuring freezing behavior. One commonly reported observation in studies of freezing behavior is that rats with increased levels of estradiol during extinction learning show better retention of extinction than rats given extinction training when levels of estradiol are low. Here, we tested the hypothesis that fear extinction retention in a fear-potentiated startle paradigm in females is influenced by levels gonadal hormones, which we had not accounted for in our original report. We used the fear-potentiated startle paradigm to test if extinction learning was affected by estrous phase, ovariectomy, or acute systemic injections of estradiol in ovariectomized rats. We report that neither the expression nor extinction of fear-potentiated startle differed in rats given extinction training in proestrus compared to those in metestrus. Removal of the ovaries had no effect on fear acquisition or extinction learning as assessed by fear-potentiated startle. Finally, systemic injections of estradiol given to ovariectomized rats before extinction training had no effect on the expression of fear or the retention of extinction. Our findings suggest that the effect of female gonadal hormones on fear conditioning and extinction may depend on the measure of fear employed or by the parameters used to study fear learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Individual variability in the recall of fear extinction is associated with phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in the infralimbic cortex.

RATIONALE: Although most individuals will be exposed to trauma at some point, only a small portion of individuals develops posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), suggesting there are factors which render some individuals particularly susceptible to the development of this disorder. One cardinal feature of PTSD is the failure to extinguish fear responses to cues that once signaled danger. Rodent studies of fear learning and extinction have provided insight into the neural mechanisms underlying extinction; however, most of these studies have focused on mechanisms involved in typical responses and fewer have identified mechanisms that distinguish animals that extinguish well versus those that do not extinguish their fear responses. Investigation of individual differences in fear extinction might help us better understand the susceptibility to and development of PTSD. OBJECTIVES: In order to understand the neural mechanisms underlying such variation, we assessed phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (P-MAPK) levels in infralimbic cortex (IL), basolateral amygdala (BLA), and dorsal hippocampus in subsets of rats which exhibited good or poor recall of extinction. RESULTS: We found a relationship between extinction recall and P-MAPK in the IL such that rats which had good extinction recall had higher levels of P-MAPK than those which had poor extinction recall. We also found that rats which had good extinction recall had higher levels of P-MAPK in the dorsal hippocampus than control rats. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that individual differences in the recall of extinction learning can be explained by altered cell signaling in the IL.

Facilitation of fear learning by prior and subsequent fear conditioning.

Classical fear conditioning is perhaps the premier model system used to study the neurobiological basis of memory formation. Prior work has resulted in a good understanding of both the molecular mechanisms and neural circuits supporting this form of learning. However, much of what is known about these mechanisms comes from studies in which fear memory is acquired using a single, isolated training session. Given that we cannot divorce the acquisition of new information from the backdrop on which it occurs, studies are needed to determine how the acquisition of fear memory is affected by other learning events. Here, we used rats to describe the time course by which auditory fear conditioning can facilitate learning to a different fear learning event, which alone is insufficient to support long-term fear memory. First, we replicated previous findings showing that although a single trial of light and shock produces little evidence of memory, two identical trials spaced 60 min or 24 h apart support long-term memory. Next, we report that a typical auditory fear conditioning session facilitated memory formation when rats were subsequently exposed to a single trial of light and shock 60 min or 24 h, but not 4 min, later. Finally, we show that learning can be enhanced retroactively if auditory fear conditioning occurs 60 min, but not 24 h, after a single light-shock pairing. These data demonstrate that a weak fear conditioning trial can be enhanced by prior and subsequent fear conditioning depending on the timing between training events.

Behavioral and neural mechanisms by which prior experience impacts subsequent learning.

Memory is often thought about in terms of its ability to recollect and store information about the past, but its function likely rests with the fact that it permits adaptation to ongoing and future experience. Thus, the brain circuitry that encodes memory must act as if stored information is likely to be modified by subsequent experience. Considerable progress has been made in identifying the behavioral and neural mechanisms supporting the acquisition and consolidation of memories, but this knowledge comes largely from studies in laboratory animals in which the training experience is presented in isolation from prior experimentally-controlled events. Given that memories are unlikely to be formed upon a clean slate, there is a clear need to understand how learning occurs upon the background of prior experience. This article reviews recent studies from an emerging body of work on metaplasticity, memory allocation, and synaptic tagging and capture, all of which demonstrate that prior experience can have a profound effect on subsequent learning. Special attention will be given to discussion of the neural mechanisms that allow past experience to affect future learning and to the time course by which past learning events can alter subsequent learning. Finally, consideration will be given to the possible significance of a non-synaptic component of the memory trace, which in some cases is likely responsible for the priming of subsequent learning and may be involved in the recovery from amnestic treatments in which the synaptic mechanisms of memory have been impaired.

Regulation of actions and habits by ventral hippocampal trkB and adolescent corticosteroid exposure.

In humans and rodents, stress promotes habit-based behaviors that can interfere with action-outcome decision-making. Further, developmental stressor exposure confers long-term habit biases across rodent-primate species. Despite these homologies, mechanisms remain unclear. We first report that exposure to the primary glucocorticoid corticosterone (CORT) in adolescent mice recapitulates multiple neurobehavioral consequences of stressor exposure, including long-lasting biases towards habit-based responding in a food-reinforced operant conditioning task. In both adolescents and adults, CORT also caused a shift in the balance between full-length tyrosine kinase receptor B (trkB) and a truncated form of this neurotrophin receptor, favoring the inactive form throughout multiple corticolimbic brain regions. In adolescents, phosphorylation of the trkB substrate extracellular signal-regulated kinase 42/44 (ERK42/44) in the ventral hippocampus was also diminished, a long-term effect that persisted for at least 12 wk. Administration of the trkB agonist 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (7,8-DHF) during adolescence at doses that stimulated ERK42/44 corrected long-lasting corticosterone-induced behavioral abnormalities. Meanwhile, viral-mediated overexpression of truncated trkB in the ventral hippocampus reduced local ERK42/44 phosphorylation and was sufficient to induce habit-based and depression-like behaviors. Together, our findings indicate that ventral hippocampal trkB is essential to goal-directed action selection, countering habit-based behavior otherwise facilitated by developmental stress hormone exposure. They also reveal an early-life sensitive period during which trkB-ERK42/44 tone determines long-term behavioral outcomes.

Response-specific sex difference in the retention of fear extinction.

Fear conditioning studies in rodents allow us to assess vulnerability factors which might underlie fear-based psychopathology such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite PTSD being more prevalent in females than males, very few fear conditioning studies in rodents have tested females. Our study assessed fear conditioning and extinction in male and female rats using both fear-potentiated startle and freezing behavior as measures. Rats were trained to fear cues that predicted the occurrence of shock and then subsequently exposed to an extinction training procedure where the cue was presented repeatedly in the absence of shock. Retention of the extinction memory was assessed the next day. Our results showed that females exhibited less retention of fear extinction, but only when measured by fear-potentiated startle. Our results highlight the importance of using multiple indices of fear behavior, particularly when comparing sexes on measures of extinction learning.

Acoustic startle response in rats predicts inter-individual variation in fear extinction.

Although a large portion of the population is exposed to a traumatic event at some point, only a small percentage of the population develops post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), suggesting the presence of predisposing factors. Abnormal acoustic startle response (ASR) has been shown to be associated with PTSD, implicating it as a potential predictor of the development of PTSD-like behavior. Since poor extinction and retention of extinction learning are characteristic of PTSD patients, it is of interest to determine if abnormal ASR is predictive of development of such deficits. To determine whether baseline ASR has utility in predicting the development of PTSD-like behavior, the relationship between baseline ASR and freezing behavior following Pavlovian fear conditioning was examined in a group of adult, male Sprague-Dawley rats. Baseline acoustic startle response (ASR) was assessed preceding exposure to a Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm where freezing behavior was measured during fear conditioning, extinction training, and extinction testing. Although there was no relationship between baseline ASR and fear memory following conditioning, rats with low baseline ASR had significantly lower magnitude of retention of the extinction memory than rats with high baseline ASR. The results suggest that baseline ASR has value as a predictive index of the development of a PTSD-like phenotype.

Differential expression of cytoskeletal regulatory factors in the adolescent prefrontal cortex: Implications for cortical development.

The prevalence of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, and drug and alcohol use disorders peaks during adolescence. Further, up to 50% of "adult" mental health disorders emerge in adolescence. During adolescence, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) undergoes dramatic structural reorganization, in which dendritic spines and synapses are refined, pruned, and stabilized. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie these processes should help to identify factors that influence the development of psychiatric illness. Here we briefly discuss the anatomical connections of the medial and orbital prefrontal cortex (mPFC and OFC, respectively). We then present original findings suggesting that dendritic spines on deep-layer excitatory neurons in the mouse mPFC and OFC prune at different adolescent ages, with later pruning in the OFC. In parallel, we used Western blotting to define levels of several cytoskeletal regulatory proteins during early, mid-, and late adolescence, focusing on tropomyosin-related kinase receptor B (TrkB) and ß1-integrin-containing receptors and select signaling partners. We identified regional differences in the levels of several proteins in early and midadolescence that then converged in early adulthood. We also observed age-related differences in TrkB levels, both full-length and truncated isoforms, Rho-kinase 2, and synaptophysin in both PFC subregions. Finally, we identified changes in protein levels in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus that were distinct from those in the PFC. We conclude with a general review of the manner in which TrkB- and ß1-integrin-mediated signaling influences neuronal structure in the postnatal brain. Elucidating the role of cytoskeletal regulatory factors throughout adolescence may identify critical mechanisms of PFC development. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mechanisms underlying long-term fear memory formation from a metaplastic neuronal state.

We previously showed that a single weak fear conditioning trial, that does not produce a long-term fear memory (LTM), appeared to prime memory formation such that when a second trial followed within a circumscribed time window a robust and long-lasting fear memory was formed. We also showed that this priming effect could be blocked if we interfered with protein kinase A (PKA) signaling in the amygdala during the first conditioning trial. The goals of the current study were to determine if LTM formation after the second trial depends on PKA signaling in the amygdala and to characterize the underlying memory processes engaged during the second trial that allows for LTM formation. Our interpretation of the original findings is that the second conditioning trial triggers LTM from a metaplastic state that is engaged by the first conditioning trial. However, it is also possible that the second conditioning trial acts as a reminder of the first and engages a reconsolidation-like process. Several experiments were conducted to distinguish between these two possibilities. We show that interfering with PKA signaling during the second conditioning trial disrupts memory formation. However, if a third trial follows the second or if the second trial was presented without shock, the PKA inhibitor was no longer effective. Our findings demonstrate that the induction of fear memory from a metaplastic state involves new learning that is distinct from retrieval-dependent updating of memories.

Memory accuracy predicts hippocampal mTOR pathway activation following retrieval of contextual fear memory.

Prior work suggests that hippocampus-dependent memory undergoes a systems consolidation process such that recent memories are stored in the hippocampus, while older memories are independent of the hippocampus and instead dependent on cortical areas. One problem with interpreting these studies is that memory for the contextual stimuli weakens as time passes between the training event and testing and older memories are often less detailed, making it difficult to determine if memory storage in the hippocampus is related to the age or to the accuracy of the memory. Activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is known to be important for controlling protein translation necessary for both memory consolidation after initial learning and for the reconsolidation of memory after retrieval. We tested whether p70s6 kinase (p70s6K), a key component of the mTOR signaling pathway, is activated following retrieval of context fear memory in the dorsal hippocampus (DH) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) at 1, 10, or 36 days after context fear conditioning. We also tested whether strengthening memory for the contextual stimuli changed p70s6K phosphorylation in these structures 36 days after training. We show that under standard training conditions retrieval of a recently formed memory is initially precise and involves the DH. Over time it loses detail, becomes independent of the DH and depends on the ACC. In a subsequent experiment, we preserved the accuracy of older memories through pre-exposure to the training context. We show that remote memory still involved the DH in animals given pre-exposure. These data support the notion that detailed memories depend on the DH regardless of their age.

Implications of memory modulation for post-traumatic stress and fear disorders.

Post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder and phobia manifest in ways that are consistent with an uncontrollable state of fear. Their development involves heredity, previous sensitizing experiences, association of aversive events with previous neutral stimuli, and inability to inhibit or extinguish fear after it is chronic and disabling. We highlight recent progress in fear learning and memory, differential susceptibility to disorders of fear, and how these findings are being applied to the understanding, treatment and possible prevention of fear disorders. Promising advances are being translated from basic science to the clinic, including approaches to distinguish risk versus resilience before trauma exposure, methods to interfere with fear development during memory consolidation after a trauma, and techniques to inhibit fear reconsolidation and to enhance extinction of chronic fear. It is hoped that this new knowledge will translate to more successful, neuroscientifically informed and rationally designed approaches to disorders of fear regulation.

A metaplasticity-like mechanism supports the selection of fear memories: role of protein kinase a in the amygdala.

How the brain determines which memories are selected for long-term storage is critical for a full understanding of memory. One possibility is that memories are selected based on the history of activity and current state of neurons within a given memory circuit. Many in vitro studies have demonstrated metaplasticity-like effects whereby prior neuronal activity can affect the ability of cells to express synaptic plasticity in the future; however, the significance of these findings to memory is less clear. Here we show in rats that a single pairing of a light with shock, insufficient to support either short- or long-term fear memory, primes future learning such that another trial delivered within a circumscribed time window lasting from ∼60 min to 3 d results in the formation of a long-lasting and robust fear memory. Two adequately spaced training trials support long-term fear memory only if the two trials are signaled by the same cue. Furthermore, although a single training trial does not support formation of an observable fear memory, it does result in the phosphorylation of several targets of protein kinase A (PKA) in the amygdala. Accordingly, blocking PKA signaling in the amygdala before the first training trial completely prevents the ability of that trial to facilitate the formation of long-term fear memory when a second trial is delivered 24 h later. These findings may provide insight into how memories are selected for long-term storage.

The timing of multiple retrieval events can alter GluR1 phosphorylation and the requirement for protein synthesis in fear memory reconsolidation.

Numerous studies have indicated that maintaining a fear memory after retrieval requires de novo protein synthesis. However, no study to date has examined how the temporal dynamics of repeated retrieval events affect this protein synthesis requirement. The present study varied the timing of a second retrieval of an established auditory fear memory and followed this second retrieval with infusions of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin (ANI) into the basolateral amygdala. Results indicated that the memory-impairing effects of ANI were not observed when the second retrieval occurred soon after the first (within 1 h), and that the inhibitor gradually regained effectiveness as the retrieval episodes were spaced further apart. Additionally, if the second of the closely timed retrievals was omitted prior to ANI infusions, long-term memory deficits were observed, suggesting that the altered effectiveness of ANI was due specifically to the second retrieval event. Further experiments revealed that the second retrieval was not associated with a change in Zif268 protein expression but did produce a rapid and persistent dephosphorylation of GluR1 receptors at Ser845, an AMPAR trafficking site known to regulate the stability of GluR2 lacking AMPARs, which have been shown to be important in memory updating. This suggests that the precise timing of multiple CS presentations during the reconsolidation window may affect the destabilization state of the memory trace.