Surgical wound infections after vascular surgery: prospective multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: this multicenter prospective observational study defined the incidence and risk factors of surgical wound infections (SWI) after infrarenal aortic and lower limb vascular surgery procedures and evaluated the severity and costs of these infections. METHODS: the study cohort comprised of 184 consecutive patients. Postoperative complications were recorded. The additional costs attributable to SWI were calculated. RESULTS: Eighty-four (46%) patients had critical ischaemia, 81 (45%) patients underwent infrainguinal bypass surgery and 64 (35%) received vascular prosthesis or prosthetic patch. Forty-nine (27%) patients developed SWI. Staphylococcus aureus was the leading pathogen cultured from the wound. Forty-seven of the 49 infected wounds responded to and healed with the treatment. SWI was the cause of one major amputation. Independent predictors for SWI were infrainguinal surgery (OR 7.2, 95% Cl 2.92-17.65, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 6.1, 95% Cl 2.44-15.16, p < 0.001) and arteriography injection site within the operative area (OR 2.5, 95% Cl 1.13-5.48, p = 0.02). The average cost attributable to SWI was 3320 Ä. CONCLUSION: the incidence of SWI after vascular surgery is high. The risk factors for SWI are infrainguinal surgery, obesity and arteriography injection site within the operative area. SWI increases morbidity and costs of operative treatment.

Carotid artery surgery--critical analysis of indications in a regional Finnish vascular center.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze retrospectively the treatment of patients referred for carotid artery stenosis to a vascular surgical unit in the 1990's. Main attention was paid to the appropriateness of the indications for CEA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the Pirkanmaa region (population of 440 000), all carotid surgery is performed in the regional University Hospital. All new referrals for vascular surgery because of carotid stenosis or bruit in 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996 and 1998 were included and case records reviewed. RESULTS: Four hundred patients were referred. Indication for referral was a neurologic event in 46.2%, indefinite symptom in 27.9% and asymptomatic stenosis or carotid bruit in 25.9%. Most patients underwent carotid ultrasound as first imaging (93.7%). Almost half of the patients were operated (n=176). The 30-day combined stroke and death rate was 6.5%. Appropriate indication for CEA was found in 31.6%. Over half (57.0%) of the indications were considered uncertain and 11.4% inappropriate, most of these patients having asymptomatic stenosis. CONCLUSION: Patients with asymptomatic stenosis underwent CEA relatively often and the proportion of inappropriate indications was too high. Evaluation of indications and perioperative complications is highly important in carotid surgery.

The results of operative resection of the lateral end of the clavicle.

Seventy-three patients had operative resection of the lateral end of the clavicle for the treatment of a painful condition of the acromioclavicular joint. Thirty-two of the patients had had a traumatic separation of the acromioclavicular joint, eight had had a fracture of the lateral end of the clavicle, and thirty-three had primary acromioclavicular osteoarthrosis. An average of sixteen millimeters (range, fine to thirty-three had primary acromioclavicular osteoarthrosis. An average of sixteen millimeters (range, five to thirty-seven millimeters) was resected; the amount was similar in each of the three groups. The patients were evaluated an average of nine years (range, four to sixteen years) after the operation. The result was considered good in twenty-one patients, satisfactory in twenty-nine, and poor in twenty-three. A poor result was more common in the patients who had had a fracture of the lateral end of the clavicle (p<0.01). Forty-six patients reported pain with exertion, and thirteen noted pain at rest. Eighteen patients had a decrease in the strength of the involved upper extremity, and sixteen had some limitation of the mobility of the shoulder. Elevation of the lateral end of the remaining part of the clavicle as compared with the scapula was noted in eighteen patients and was more likely to be associated with pain (p<0.05). The extent of the resection was significantly associated with pain; patients who had had a smaller amount of resection (ten millimeters or less) had less pain than those who had had a larger amount (p<0.03). A good result was more common in the patients in whom less than ten millimeters had been resected and who had had a previous traumatic separation of the acromioclavicular joint or had primary acromioclavicular osteoarthrosis. We recommend that resection of the lateral end of the clavicle be considered with caution for patients who have severe post-traumatic or degenerative osteoarthrosis of the acromioclavicular joint. If resection is performed, it should not exceed ten millimeters.