Perceived impact of discussions with a healthcare professional on patients' decision regarding COVID-19 vaccine.

There is evidence that advice from Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) plays an important role in patients' decision to get vaccinated, but the extent to which patients perceive this impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the perceived impact of a discussion with a HCP on participants' decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adults who consulted a general practitioner (GP) or a pharmacist in Ile-de-France, France, after COVID-19 vaccines became available (October-November 2021 period). A total of 344 participants were included, 65.2% of whom reported having had a discussion about COVID-19 vaccines with a HCP. Overall, 55% of participants were advised to be vaccinated by their HCP. Most of the discussions took place with a GP (n = 203, 48.9%). According to 52.5% of participants, the discussion had a positive impact, i.e. it was perceived as encouraging vaccination. The latter reported that, among HCPs, GPs had the greatest number of discussions with a positive impact on the decision to be vaccinated against COVID-19 (93.1%). In the study population, the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rate, according to the WHO definition, was high (38.1%), although the COVID-19 vaccine coverage rate was 87.1%. Vaccine hesitant participants were more likely to report a discussion that had a perceived negative impact on their decision to get vaccinated (20.0%) than non-hesitant participants (5.8%, p = .004).

Barriers and facilitators to the HPV vaccine: a multicenter qualitative study of French general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: In France, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage is low, with 30.7% of 17-year-old girls having received a complete HPV vaccination schedule in 2020. AIM: To determine the perspective and behaviors of general practitioners (GPs) regarding HPV vaccination with their patients and if a reluctance is observed. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study based on semi-directed individual interviews was conducted between December 2019 and December 2020. A representative sample of GPs with various profiles were included in 4 French regions. METHOD: A purposive sampling was used and interviews were continued until data saturation was reached. The analysis was based on the grounded theory. RESULTS: Twenty-six GPs aged 29-66 years were interviewed. The measures taken by the French health authorities (lowering the target age, reimbursing the vaccine, extending the target population to boys) were perceived as facilitators. The reported barriers were organizational, due to low attendance of adolescents, and relational, mainly due to parental vaccine hesitancy. Physicians had to deal with fears about the perceived risks and concerns about sexuality conveyed by HPV vaccination and linked to the socio-cultural characteristics of the families. Physicians developed strategies, including scientific knowledge mobilization, empowerment of families by promoting health through prevention, repetition of the vaccination proposals, personal experience and relationship. Different practices were identified according to three GP typologies: effective, convinced but unpersuasive, and reluctant physicians. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, specific interventions, including communication techniques, especially for hesitant or unpersuasive physicians, are needed to enable GPs to become more effective.

Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid nucleic acid test for group A streptococcal pharyngitis using saliva samples: protocol for a prospective multicenter study in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Group A streptococcus is found in 20-40% of cases of childhood pharyngitis; the remaining cases are viral. Streptococcal pharyngitis ("strep throat") is usually treated with antibiotics, while these are not indicated in viral cases. Most guidelines recommend relying on a diagnostic test confirming the presence of group A streptococcus before prescribing antibiotics. Conventional first-line tests are rapid antigen detection tests based on throat swabs. Recently, rapid nucleic acid tests were developed; they allow the detection of elements of the genome of group A streptococcus. We hypothesize that these rapid nucleic acid tests are sensitive enough to be performed on saliva samples instead of throat swabs, which could be more convenient in practice. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating the performance of a rapid nucleic acid test for group A streptococcus (Abbott ID NOW STREP A2) in saliva, compared with a conventional pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test (EXACTO PRO STREPTATEST, lateral flow assay, comparator test), with a composite reference standard of throat culture and group A streptococcus PCR in children with pharyngitis in primary care (i.e., 27 primary care pediatricians or general practitioners). To ensure group A streptococcus is not missed, the salivary rapid nucleic acid test requires a minimally acceptable value of sensitivity (primary outcome) set at 80%. Assuming 35% of participants will have group A streptococcus, we will recruit 800 consecutive children with pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes will include difference in sensitivity between the pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test and the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; variability in sensitivity and specificity of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test with the level of McIsaac score; time to obtain the result of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; patient, physician, and parents satisfaction; and barriers and facilitators to using rapid tests for group A streptococcus in primary care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the Institutional Review Board "Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France I" (no. 2022-A00085-38). Results will be presented at international meetings and disseminated in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05521568.

How can we improve the acceptability of vaccination against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in France? An original qualitative study with focus groups comprising parents and school staff, interviewed separately.

BACKGROUND: It has been proven that vaccination is effective against Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infections, genital warts, and pre-cancerous and cancerous cervical lesions. Nevertheless, the HPV vaccine coverage of 37.4 % in 2021 in France is one of the lowest in Europe. To explore and understand the reason why French population is so late compared to its neighbours, we carried out focus groups with mothers and with National Education school staff. We aimed to identify knowledge and perceptions of HPV in both study populations, as well as factors influencing HPV vaccination. METHODS: Between January 2020 and March 2021, we performed a qualitative study using an inductive approach with a thematic content analysis (TCA). We conducted semi-structured focus groups with 29 people including 15 mothers of adolescents in middle schools and 14 school staff from the national education system. RESULTS: Different factors influenced the decision-making process of parents and school staff: knowledge and perceptions of HPV and its vaccine, sources of information about HPV and vaccination. Mothers' discourses differed from those of school staff. They mentioned the importance of gynaecological monitoring and the negative image of pharmaceutical companies, and questioned internet as a reliable source of information. For their part, school staff mentioned cultural and/or religious affiliation, municipalities' role to inform the population, and ethical dilemma or logistical challenges regarding HPV vaccination in schools. CONCLUSION: The results of these focus groups provided information on which elements may harm or help HPV vaccination. Identified perceptions, beliefs, knowledge, barriers, and facilitators will help us to build an intervention program focus on general practitioners (GP), school staff, parents, and adolescents.

Perceptions, Representations, and Experiences of Patients Presenting Nonspecific Symptoms in the Context of Suspected Lyme Borreliosis.

BACKGROUND: Some subjective symptoms may be reported at all stages of Lyme borreliosis (LB) and may persist for several months after treatment. Nonspecific symptoms without any objective manifestation of LB are sometimes attributed by patients to a possible tick bite. The aim of our study was to explore the perceptions, representations, and experiences that these patients had of their disease and care paths. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study through individual interviews (October 2017-May 2018), based on grounded theory, following the COREQ checklist. A balanced sample of patients with diverse profiles was recruited at consultations with general practitioners and infectious disease physicians. RESULTS: Twelve patients were interviewed. Data saturation was reached at the twelfth interview. For codes, 293 were identified, and classified into 5 themes: (1) the experience of disabling nonspecific symptoms, especially pain, causing confusion and fear, (2) long and difficult care paths for the majority of the patients, experienced as an obstacle course, (3) a break with the previous state of health, causing a negative impact on every sphere of the patient's life, (4) empowerment of the patients and the self-management of their disease, and (5) the strong expression of a desire for change, with better listening, greater recognition of the symptoms, and simpler care paths. CONCLUSIONS: This study allows for the understanding of a patient's behaviours and the obstacles encountered, the way they are perceived, and the necessary solutions. The patients' expectations identified here could help physicians better understand the doctor-patient relationship in these complex management situations, which would reduce the burden of the disease. The current development of specialised reference centres could help meet the patients' demands and those of family physicians.

Patient-Physician Agreement in Reporting and Prioritizing Existing Chronic Conditions.

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to assess (1) the agreement between patient self-reports and general practitioner (GP) reports of the chronic conditions affecting the patients and (2) the agreement between patients and GPs on health priorities in a primary care setting. METHOD: Patients were recruited in the Parisian area of France by a convenience sample of GPs; eligibility criteria required that the GP was the patient's listed primary care provider for at least 12 months. Participants were asked to report all the patient's current chronic conditions by using a previously developed list of 124 chronic conditions and write a list of up to 3 priority conditions. RESULTS: From April to May 2017, 233 patients were recruited from 16 GP practices. Agreement between the number of conditions reported by patients and by GPs was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.59, 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.69). Agreement between patient self-reports and GP reports of each chronic condition ranged from very good (eg, κ = 0.85 for hypothyroidism) to poor (eg, κ = 0.12 for chronic anxiety disorder). Among the 153 patient-GP pairs for which both the patient and GP wrote a priority list, 45 (29.4%) of patients' first priorities did not appear anywhere on the corresponding GPs' lists, and 19 (12.4%) pairs had no matching priority condition. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between patients and their GPs varied widely depending on the diseases reported. Low agreement on health priorities suggests a need for improvement to ensure better alignment between patient and physician perspectives.

Mandatory vaccination of infants in France: Is that the way forward?

In this opinion paper, the authors argue that the extension of mandatory immunization of infants up to two years of age from three diseases (diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis) to 11 diseases, introduced in France in January 2018, is not a sustainable response to the challenge of controlling vaccine-preventable diseases. In France in 2017, infant immunization coverage (IC) rates were sufficiently high or increasing (hepatitis B), except for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) and meningococcus C disease. Even if vaccination obligation makes it possible to achieve the MMR IC objectives among infants, communication programmes and supported advice from GPs are essential for the catch-up of susceptible adults to obtain herd immunity. The impact of mandatory immunization on hesitancy remains uncertain, and it contradicts the evolution of the patient's role in the governance of his own health and the principle of autonomy. Numerous studies have shown that interventions and advice from health professionals improve vaccine acceptance. To correct the poor implementation of some vaccination programmes by health professionals, strong communication and resources from health authorities are needed, rather than a retreat towards obligation. Reducing missed opportunities and increasing access to immunization are essential objectives. Finally, an immunization policy based on primary care and a patient-centred approach to each vaccination are more likely to reduce vaccine hesitancy, sustainably.

Assessment of pain during medical abortion with home use of misoprostol.

OBJECTIVES: Although medical abortion with home use of misoprostol has been shown to be safe and acceptable, there are few data about the experience of pain during the procedure. The aims of this study were to assess the intensity of pain associated with home use of misoprostol for medical abortion and to identify variables associated with severe pain. METHODS: This was an observational study using an anonymous web-based questionnaire in patients having a medical abortion at home in France between 1 December 2013 and 30 April 2014. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 232 women and the results of 193 were retained for analysis. The average pain score was 5.6 on a 10 point scale. A pain score ≥6 was rated as severe and was reported by 105 patients (54%). Nulliparity (odds ratio [OR] 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04, 8.22; p < .0001), lack of choice regarding the method of abortion (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.13, 4.78; p = .0218) and lack of information about the level of pain associated with the procedure (OR 3.27; 95% CI 1.09, 9.74; p = .0334) were significantly correlated with severe pain. Analgesic prescriptions were very heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Pain remains the main side effect of medical abortion. More studies are needed on pain assessment and the effectiveness of analgesic treatments in women using misoprostol at home for medical abortion, in order to improve their care and improve evidence-based guidelines.

Suspected community-acquired pneumonia in an ambulatory setting (CAPA): a French prospective observational cohort study in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have addressed the pragmatic management of ambulatory patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using a precise description of the disease with or without chest X-ray (X-ray) evidence. AIMS: To describe the characteristics, clinical findings, additional investigations and disease progression in patients with suspected CAP managed by French General Practitioners (GPs). METHODS: The patients included were older than 18 years, with signs or symptoms suggestive of CAP associated with recent-onset unilateral crackles on auscultation or a new opacity on X-ray. They were followed for up to 6 weeks. Descriptive analyses of all patients and according to their management with X-rays were carried out. RESULTS: From September 2011 to July 2012, 886 patients have been consulted by 267 GPs. Among them, 278 (31%) were older than 65 years and 337 (38%) were at increased risk for invasive pneumococcal disease. At presentation, the three most common symptoms, cough (94%), fever (93%), and weakness or myalgia (81%), were all observed in 70% of patients. Unilateral crackles were observed in 77% of patients. Among patients with positive radiography (64%), 36% had no unilateral crackles. A null CRB-65 score was obtained in 62% of patients. Most patients (94%) initially received antibiotics and experienced uncomplicated disease progression regardless of their management with X-rays. Finally, 7% of patients were hospitalised and 0.3% died. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients consulting GPs for suspected CAP had the three following most common symptoms: cough, fever, and weakness or myalgia. More than a third of them were at increased risk for invasive pneumococcal disease. With or without X-rays, most patients received antibiotics and experienced uncomplicated disease progression.

Vaccine knowledge in students in Paris, France, and surrounding regions.

INTRODUCTION: In France, young adults are legally freed from parental authority at the age of 18 years and are, thus, responsible for their own vaccine record. This young adult population is more frequently exposed to vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors associated with students' knowledge of the interval between two antitetanus boosters and their report of having up-to-date vaccinations. METHODS: In April 2009, a survey was conducted involving a random sample of students between 18 and 25 years of age eating lunch at university dining facilities in Paris and its suburbs (Ile de France). RESULTS: Among the 677 students approached, 583 agreed to participate. Only 207 (36%) of respondents knew the recommended dosing interval between two doses of tetanus vaccine booster (10 years). The majority of students (69%) reported having up-to-date vaccinations. Declaring having up-to-date vaccinations was significantly associated with having a general practitioner (OR 3.03 [95% CI 1.69 to 5.55]). Health care students were significantly more likely to know the decennial interval between two antitetanus boosters (OR 2 [95% CI 1.28 to 3.25]). Most of responding students (n=519 [89%]) believed that vaccines were very useful. CONCLUSIONS: An overall lack of knowledge of vaccines was observed among this student population. Health care providers, such as GPs and university medical practice staff, who interact with these young individuals have an essential role to promote better vaccination coverage in this population.

INTRODUCTION: En France, les jeunes adultes sont légalement libérés de l'autorité parentale à 18 ans et deviennent donc responsables de leur dossier de vaccination. La population de jeunes adultes est davantage exposée aux maladies infectieuses évitables par la vaccination. OBJECTIF: Déterminer les facteurs associés aux connaissances des étudiants sur l'intervalle entre les deux doses de rappel du vaccin contre le tétanos et sur leur déclaration d'avoir une couverture vaccinale. MÉTHODOLOGIE: En avril 2009, un sondage a été mené auprès d'un échantillon aléatoire d'étudiants de 18 à 25 ans qui, le midi, mangent aux cafétérias universitaires de Paris et des banlieues (Île de France). RÉSULTATS: Sur les 677 étudiants abordés, 583 ont accepté de participer. Seulement 207 des répondants (36 %) connaissaient l'intervalle recommandé entre deux doses de rappel du vaccin contre le tétanos (dix ans). La majorité des étudiants (69 %) déclarai avoir une couverture vaccinale à jour. Cette déclaration s'associait de manière significative au fait d'avoir un praticien général (RC 3,03 95 % IC 1,69 à 5,55]). Les étudiants du milieu de la santé étaient considérablement plus enclins à connaître l'intervalle de dix ans entre deux doses de rappel du vaccin antitétanique (RC 2 [95 % IC 1,28 à 3,25]). La plupart des étudiants répondants (n=519 [89 %]) croyaient en l'utilité des vaccins. CONCLUSIONS: Les chercheurs ont constaté une ignorance globale des vaccins au sein de cette population de patients. Les dispensateurs de soins, tels que les praticiens généraux et le personnel médical en milieu universitaire, qui dialoguent avec ces jeunes, ont un rôle essentiel à jouer pour promouvoir une meilleure couverture vaccinale au sein de cette population.

[Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency: epidemiology, measurement, prevention and treatment]. / Insuffisance et déficit en vitamine D: épidémiologie, indications du dosage, prévention et traitement.

Vitamin D has been traditionally considered as important for skeletal health. However, during the past decade, numerous research findings have revealed that vitamin D may have beneficial effects on extraskeletal tissues as well. Vitamin D deficiency is now recognized as a worldwide issue. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency depends on the threshold used to define vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. However, whatever the threshold (20, 30 or 40 ng/mL), the prevalence is high in France as elsewhere. Vitamin D status is now based on the measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration. This assay does not seem justified in most situations encountered in clinical practice, and its overprescription generates a significant cost to public health. This is why Official Clinical Societies try to define: (a) target populations for which a determination is required (every situation in which the therapeutic goal requires an optimal serum 25(OH)D level for an appropriate medical care) and which require specific treatment; (b) target populations for which the risk of deficit is important (due to insufficient daily intake) and may benefit from preventive pharmaceutical supplementation without prior testing (infants, pregnant women, patients over 65...).

[French general practitioners' perceptions and use of neuraminidase inhibitors during the pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza]. / Médicaments antiviraux spécifiques de la grippe pendant la pandémie A(H1N1)2009 : usage et perception des médecins généralistes français.

The purpose of this study is to describe the perception of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) during the pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza among general practitioners. A survey was conducted between 15 July and 15 September 2010 among a random sample of metropolitan French GPs. Among the 161 respondents, only 6% reported that they "often" prescribed NAIs during the pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza, while 69% reported that they prescribed NAIs "from time to time". The main objectives of GPs were to limit the risk of complications and the duration of symptoms. The main predictor of prescription of neuraminidase inhibitors during the pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza was the prescription of NAIs during epidemic seasonal periods (OR = 3.23 [95% CI 1.3 to 8.8]). Barriers to the prescription of NAIs were an estimated lack of efficacy (64%) and a negative benefit/risk balance (52%). Among the GPs surveyed in this research, 62% reported that they had been vaccinated against influenza A(H1N1)2009, while 73% recommended vaccination. GPs who prescribed NAIs during the pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza were those who prescribed NAIs during a seasonal influenza epidemic. To improve the outpatient prescription of NAIs during pandemic outbreaks, more knowledge about NAIs is required during seasonal influenza.

[A survey about determinants of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccination among French general practionners patients. Motivac study]. / Déterminants de la vaccination contre la grippe A(H1N1) 2009. Enquête auprès des patients de médecins généralistes français. Etude Motivac.

The influenza A/H1N1 2009 immunization campaign did not have the accession of the French population resulting in a very low rate of immunization coverage. We conducted a cross-sectional study in spring 2010 to identify factors that led general practitionners (GPs) and their adult patients to be vaccinated or not; 43 GPs in France, included 668 patients; 29 GPs (67%) and 108 patients (16.5%) have been vaccinated; among 238 patients under vaccine priority indication 17% were vaccinated; 48% of patients thought they could receive effective treatment for influenza, 36% felt that the vaccine protected against influenza but 27% thought it did not meet usual safety criteria. A higher level of education, the belief of an effective protection with vaccination, the positive GP's opinion and behavior (OR 4,21 IC95% [1.4-14]; p=0.012), the receipt of an invitation to immunization (OR 7, 1 IC95% [1.73-58.4] and the active seek of information (OR 8.05, IC95% [2.8-27]) were significantly associated with vaccination. Regarding this immunization campaign few patients n=87 (13.7%) did trust the state heath agency. Our study confirms the distrust of the vaccine and suggests the decisive role of the GPs to achieve adequate levels of immunization coverage.

Evidence of Bordetella pertussis infection in adults presenting with persistent cough in a french area with very high whole-cell vaccine coverage.

Although France has had a vaccination program for 40 years, since 1990, an increase in whooping cough cases with parent-infant transmission has been observed. This study prospectively assessed the frequency of Bordetella pertussis infection in adults who consulted general practitioners for a persistent cough without an evident diagnosis. Among 217 patients, 70 (32%) confirmed whooping cough cases were identified. One case was culture positive, 36 were polymerase chain reaction positive, and 40 had increases or decreases of > or =2-fold in anti-pertussis toxin IgG titer between serum samples collected during the acute and convalescent phases. The median duration of cough in confirmed cases was 49 days (range, 13-123 days). Of the patients, 60% reported vaccination, and 33% reported whooping cough in infancy. Pertussis should be considered for diagnosis of acute and chronic cough in adults. Future studies should evaluate the public health interest of booster doses of pertussis vaccine in adults.