An AI-based universal phantom analysis method based on XML-SVG wireframes with novel functional object identifiers.

Objective.Quality assurance (QA) testing must be performed at regular intervals to ensure that medical devices are operating within designed specifications. Numerous QA phantoms and software packages have been developed to facilitate measurements of machine performance. However, due to the hard-coded nature of geometric phantom definition in analysis software, users are typically limited to the use of a small subset of compatible QA phantoms. In this work, we present a novel AI-based universal Phantom (UniPhan) algorithm that is not phantom specific and can be easily adapted to any pre-existing image-based QA phantom.Approach.Extensible Markup Language Scalable Vector Graphics (XML-SVG) was modified to include several new tags describing the function of embedded phantom objects for use in QA analysis. Functional tags include contrast and density plugs, spatial linearity markers, resolution bars and edges, uniformity regions, and light-radiation field coincidence areas. Machine learning was used to develop an image classification model for automatic phantom type detection. After AI phantom identification, UniPhan imported the corresponding XML-SVG wireframe, registered it to the image taken during the QA process, performed analysis on the functional tags, and exported results for comparison to expected device specifications. Analysis results were compared to those generated by manual image analysis.Main results.XML-SVG wireframes were generated for several commercial phantoms including ones specific to CT, CBCT, kV planar imaging, and MV imaging. Several functional objects were developed and assigned to the graphical elements of the phantoms. The AI classification model was tested for training and validation accuracy and loss, along with phantom type prediction accuracy and speed. The results reported training and validation accuracies of 99%, phantom type prediction confidence scores of around 100%, and prediction speeds of around 0.1 s. Compared to manual image analysis, Uniphan results were consistent across all metrics including contrast-to-noise ratio, modulation-transfer function, HU accuracy, and uniformity.Significance.The UniPhan method can identify phantom type and use its corresponding wireframe to perform QA analysis. As these wireframes can be generated in a variety of ways this represents an accessible automated method of analyzing image-based QA phantoms that is flexible in scope and implementation.

A phase 1 trial utilizing TMI with fludarabine-melphalan in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing second allo-SCT.

Relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains the primary cause of treatment failure. A second SCT can result in long-term survival in a subset of patients, but the relapse rate remains high. We conducted a single-center, phase 1, modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation study of the feasibility of combining intensity-modulated total marrow irradiation (IM-TMI) with fludarabine and melphalan for conditioning. Between December 2015 and May 2020, 21 patients with relapsed hematologic disease undergoing second or greater allo-SCT were treated with IM-TMI doses of 6 Gy, 9 Gy, or 12 Gy. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event; mucositis was the primary dose-limiting toxicity. The median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 10 and 18 days, respectively. The 1-year cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease was 65% (95% confidence interval CI, 38-83). The nonrelapse mortality at 2 years was 17% (95% CI, 4-39). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 35% (95% CI, 13-58). Two-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 48% and 50%. We conclude that combining IM-TMI with fludarabine-melphalan is feasible. We recommend 12 Gy of IM-TMI with fludarabine-melphalan for second SCT, although 9 Gy may be used for older or underweight patients.

Knowledge-based planning for multi-isocenter VMAT total marrow irradiation.

Purpose: Total marrow irradiation (TMI) involves optimization of extremely large target volumes and requires extensive clinical experience and time for both treatment planning and delivery. Although volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) achieves substantial reduction in treatment delivery time, planning process still presents a challenge due to use of multiple isocenters and multiple overlapping arcs. We developed and evaluated a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model for VMAT-TMI to address these clinical challenges. Methods: Fifty-one patients previously treated in our clinic were selected for the model training, while 22 patients from another clinic were used as a test set. All plans used a 3-isocenter to cover sub-target volumes of head and neck (HN), chest, and pelvis. Chest plan was performed first and then used as the base dose for both the HN and pelvis plans to reduce hot spots around the field junctions. This resulted in a wide range of dose-volume histograms (DVH). To address this, plans without the base-dose plan were optimized and added to the library to train the model. Results: KBP achieved our clinical goals (95% of PTV receives 100% of Rx) in a single day, which used to take 4-6 days of effort without KBP. Statistically significant reductions with KBP were observed in the mean dose values to brain, lungs, oral cavity and lenses. KBP substantially improved 105% dose spillage (14.1% ± 2.4% vs 31.8% ± 3.8%), conformity index (1.51 ± 0.06 vs 1.81 ± 0.12) and homogeneity index (1.25 ± 0.02 vs 1.33 ± 0.03). Conclusions: KBP improved dosimetric performance with uniform quality. It reduced dependence on planner experience and achieved a factor of 5 reduction in planning time to produce quality plans to allow its wide-spread clinical implementation.

Predictors of Pneumonitis in Combined Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: Thoracic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with high rates of local control but carries a risk of pneumonitis. Immunotherapy is a standard treatment for patients with metastatic disease but can also cause pneumonitis. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of thoracic SBRT with systemic immunotherapy, clinical outcomes of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and SBRT on prospective trials were reviewed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three consecutive phase 1 trials of combination SBRT and ICB conducted between 2016 to 2020 for widely metastatic solid tumors were reviewed. The protocols mandated adherence to NRG BR001/BR002 organs at risk constraints, resulting in <100% coverage of some target volumes. ICB was administered either sequentially (within 7 days after completion of SBRT) or concurrently (before or at the start of SBRT), depending on protocol. End points included pneumonitis, dose-volume constraints, local failure, and overall survival. The cumulative incidence estimator and Kaplan-Meier method were used. RESULTS: In the study, 123 patients met eligibility with 311 metastases irradiated. The most common histologies included non-small cell lung cancer (33%) and colorectal cancer (12%). Median follow-up was 12 months. The overall rate of grade 3+ pneumonitis was 8.1%; 1-year local failure was 3.6%. Established dosimetric parameters were significantly associated with the development of pneumonitis (P < .05). In most patients, the lungs were not challenged with high doses of radiation, defined as receiving ≥75% of the maximum for a given lung dose-volume constraint. Patients who were challenged were not found to have a significantly higher risk of pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series of thoracic SBRT and immunotherapy, local control was excellent with acceptable toxicity and support the conclusion that established dose-volume constraints for the lung are safe. However, these results highlight the potential value in reporting of organs at risk being challenged with doses approaching protocol specified limits.

A Phase 1 Trial of Concurrent or Sequential Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Stage IV NSCLC Study.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have evaluated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic patients with NSCLC, including multimodality treatment with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 monotherapy. Questions remain regarding the timing of SBRT and immunotherapy, safety with dual checkpoint blockade, and the utility in widely metastatic patients. This randomized phase 1 trial combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with sequential or concurrent multisite SBRT in patients with stage IV NSCLC to evaluate safety and obtain preliminary activity data. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC were randomized to concurrent (SBRT with immunotherapy) or sequential (SBRT followed by immunotherapy) treatment. A maximum of four treatment fields received SBRT. Nivolumab and ipilimumab were continued until clinical progression, development of toxicity, or after 2 years. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as greater than or equal to grade 3 toxicity to the relevant organ system attributed to SBRT and immunotherapy occuring within 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were assessable. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the concurrent cohort (n = 18). The sequential cohort required a dose reduction in the central lung group owing to two grade 4 pneumonitis events (2 of 19). Overall best response was as follows: 5.4% (2 of 37) complete response, 40.5% (15 of 37) partial response, 16.2% (6 of 37) stable disease, and 37.8% (14 of 37) progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-11.4 mo), with median follow-up of 17.0 months. Median overall survival was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent nivolumab, ipilimumab, and SBRT were not more toxic than sequential therapy, and multisite SBRT was well tolerated in widely metastatic patients. Multimodality therapy resulted in durable metastasis control and encouraging early overall survival.

Evaluation of Dose Distribution to Organs-at-Risk in a Prospective Phase 1 Trial of Pembrolizumab and Multisite Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to characterize the radiation doses to organs-at-risk (OAR) in the phase I trial (NCT02608385) that established safety/efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using NRG-BR001 dose constraints combined with programmed cell death protein 1 blockade for metastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2016 and May 2018, 73 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with SBRT followed by pembrolizumab. Tumor volumes (gross tumor volume/internal tumor volume) were delineated for each metastasis, with planning target volume contraction to limit OAR dose per protocol (n = 54) or when gross tumor volume/internal tumor volume > 65 cm3 (n = 19). For 20 OAR, doses were compared with NRG-BR001 constraints. Protocol constraints were considered challenged when the minimum of the highest dose received by ≥6 patients without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (Dmax6th) was ≥70% of the protocol constraint. RESULTS: A total of 151 metastases were irradiated including 32 peripheral lung, 23 central lung, 13 mediastinal/cervical, 24 liver, 28 abdominal-pelvic, 16 osseous, and 15 spinal metastases. A median of 2 metastases (range, 2-4) with mean volumes of 33.5 cm3 (range, 0.4-391 cm3) were treated using average planning target volumes of 50.7 cm3 (range, 3.2-161 cm3). At least 1 dose constraint from NRG-BR001 was exceeded in 38 of 73 (52%) patients. OAR constraints were challenged in 10 serial organs (gastrointestinal, cardio-pulmonary, musculoskeletal, and nervous systems) and 1 parallel OAR (lung). Grade 3 DLTs occurred in 6 patients, including pneumonitis (n = 3), colitis (n = 2), and hepatic failure (n = 1). In 4 patients, the toxicity could be directly attributed to the planned dose to OAR (ie, pneumonitis due to high lung dose or colitis due to high bowel dose). CONCLUSIONS: Multisite SBRT in combination with programmed cell death protein 1 blockade was safely tolerated when treating critical central, abdominal-pelvic, and peripheral OAR nearing NRG-BR001 constraints with clinically acceptable toxicity in the corresponding organ systems. The observed relationship between dose and DLTs in 4 of 6 patients indicates that NRG-BR001 dose constraints should be respected in subsequent trials to maintain clinical safety.

Feasibility and toxicity of hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy for large volume limited metastatic disease.

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated image guided radiation therapy (HIGRT) is increasingly used for limited metastases. Reported studies have mostly treated small volume tumors. Here, we report the toxicity and oncologic outcomes following treatment of large volume metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: HIGRT patients treated from October 2005 to March 2010 were reviewed. Gross tumor volumes (GTV) and planning target volumes (PTV) were obtained from planning software. A metastasis was considered large volume if the treated PTV exceeded 50 cc. Patients were treated with either 10-fraction (4-5 Gy per fraction) or 3-5 fraction (8-14 Gy per fraction) regimens. Toxicity was obtained from both prospectively collected databases and retrospectively from patient charts. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with 93 treated lesions >50 cc were identified. The median GTV and PTV volumes were 41 and 119 cc, respectively. The median number of treated large volume lesions was 1, and a maximum of 3 large volume lesions were treated in a single patient. Primary malignancies included non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell, colorectal, breast, bladder, pituitary, small cell lung cancer, sarcoma, head-and-neck cancer, and hepatocellular cancer. Treated sites included lung (n = 33), regional lymph nodes (n = 20), bone (n = 17), adrenal (n = 9), and liver (n = 6). The most frequently used treatment regimen was 50 Gy in 5 Gy fractions. The median follow-up was 27 months for surviving patients. Treated lesion control was 78%. Low rates of acute and late grade 3 or higher toxicity were reported, with 3 and 5 patients experiencing each, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HIGRT to large volume oligometastatic disease is tolerable and feasible with promising tumor control. Local radiation therapy should be considered in patients with large volume, limited metastatic disease.