ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of vertebral rotation, as seen in idiopathic scoliosis, on bone mineral density determination for the lumbar spine. Bone mineral content, biplanar vertebral segment area and calculated bone mineral density of each vertebra from L1 to L4 were obtained for a human cadaveric specimen. The average density for the entire L1-L4 segment was also recorded. This was done with the spine in the midline position as well as in rotation up to a maximum of 60 degrees either side of the midline. The spine was rotated in each direction using 10 degrees increments and two bone density readings were done at each rotation interval. The measured biplanar vertebral segment area increased with increasing rotation from 0 degrees to 50 degrees but decreased after 50 degrees of rotation (r = 0.73, p<0.001). The bone mineral density was significantly negatively correlated with the degree of rotation (r = -0.92, p<0.001). The decrease in measured bone mineral density was nearly 20% when the lumbar spine was rotated from neutral to 60 . This study demonstrates that degree of spinal rotation influences apparent bone mineral density by increasing the apparent vertebral segment area. The measurement change may be as high as 20%. This fact should be considered when investigating scoliotic patients with vertebral segment rotation.
Subject(s)
Bone Density/physiology , Scoliosis/physiopathology , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Cadaver , Humans , Male , Scoliosis/complications , Torsion Abnormality/complications , Torsion Abnormality/physiopathologySubject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Prostheses and Implants , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Bone Transplantation , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Male , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Pain Measurement , Prognosis , Prosthesis Design , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spinal Diseases/diagnosis , Spinal Fusion/methods , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Two patients, ages 72 and 71, who underwent lumbar decompressive surgery for spinal stenosis, were evaluated for postoperative sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL). After two uncomplicated spinal procedures, both patients developed SSHL immediately after surgery. Hearing loss was moderate to profound in these two patients. None of the patients had a significant otologic history. Nitrous oxide administration, Valsalva maneuvers during general anesthesia, and transient drops in cerebrospinal fluid pressure stemming from spinal decompression may, in some combination, lead to an implosive force on the inner ear, causing SSHL. Further causes of postlumbar surgery SSHL may include microemboli or viral infections. SSHL is a rare but possible complication after nonotologic, noncardiac bypass surgery; only 26 cases of SSHL after this surgery have been reported. We encourage the continued reporting of sudden sensorineural hearing loss after spinal surgery.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Aged , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Spinal Stenosis/complicationsABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a large series of patients who underwent spinal surgery at a single institution during a 10-year period. OBJECTIVES: To further clarify the frequency of incidental durotomy during spine surgery, its treatment, associated complications, and results of long-term clinical follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Incidental durotomy is a relatively common occurrence during spinal surgery. There remains significant concern about it despite reports of good associated clinical outcomes. There have been few large clinical series on the subject. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of clinical and surgical records and radiographic data for consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery performed by the two senior surgeons from January 1989 through December 1998. RESULTS: A total of 2144 patients were reviewed, and 74 were found to have dural tears occurring during or before surgery. Incidental durotomy occurred at the time of surgery in 66 patients (3.1% overall incidence). Incidence varied according to the specific procedure performed but was highest in the group that underwent revision surgery. The incidence of clinically significant durotomies occurring during surgery but not identified at the time was 0.28%. All dural tears that occurred during surgery and were recognized (60 of 66) were repaired primarily. Pseudomeningoceles developed in five of the remaining six patients. All six patients had subsequent surgical repair of dural defects because of failure of conservative therapy. A mean follow-up of 22.4 months was available and showed good long-term clinical results for all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental durotomy, if recognized and treated appropriately, does not lead to long-term sequelae.
Subject(s)
Dura Mater/injuries , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Spine/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dura Mater/surgery , Female , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/etiology , Headache/surgery , Humans , Incidence , Intraoperative Complications/diagnosis , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Provocative discography is a controversial diagnostic tool for pathologic discs. Modic has identified vertebral endplate signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that are thought to signify advanced discogenic degeneration. These two distinct diagnostic tools are examined to determine if there is association between them. Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent both investigations were retrospectively reviewed. In discs that had negative T1 MRI findings, 28.2% of patients had concordant pain and 17.3% had discordant pain. In discs with positive T1 MRI findings, 34.8% of patients had concordant pain and 17.4% had discordant pain. 79.5% and 74.4% of levels with patient concordant pain on discography had no endplate changes on T1- and T2 weighted MR images, respectively (compared with 84.5% and 81.7%, respectively, for levels with no patient pain on discography). Our data showed no significant relationship between these distinct diagnostic tools. Further investigation of their relative roles in this application is recommended.
Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/pathology , Intervertebral Disc/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc/pathology , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contraindications , Contrast Media , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Low Back Pain/etiology , Low Back Pain/pathology , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effectsABSTRACT
A current focus of treatment for degenerative disk disease is the restoration of the intervertebral disk. This article summarizes the structure and function of the intervertebral disk, the pathogenesis of its degeneration, and the clinical relevance of degenerative disk disease. Current literature relating to intervertebral disk replacement and regeneration is reviewed.