Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 107(3): 325-31, 2012.
Article in Romanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22844830

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The evolution of mechanical suture technology experienced a continuous improvement but the implementation of these devices in current practice of Romanian surgery encountered difficulties related mostly to increased costs. PURPOSE: Review of casuistic related to the use of mechanical suture devices. METHODS: We studied the casuistic between 2008 and July 2011. More parameters were analyzed compared to cases in which manual suture was used. RESULTS: 74 patients benefited from using mechanical suture. Circular staplers EAEC type were used in 53 cases, TA staplers in 48 cases and Endo GIA in 19 cases. Operations performed were: 44 colo-rectal anastomoses (2 laparoscopic), 9 eso-jejunal anastomoses, 17 gastric resections, 2 duodenal stump closures and 2 rectal stump closures. One (2.56%) colorectal anastomotic fistula was found which led to death. There was a single anastomotic imperfection where we performed ileostomy with favorable evolution. Duration of Dixon's operation was shortened by 36 minutes average. The anastomosis could be lowered to 3 cm from the anal verge. There were 3 late local rectal cancer recurrences, 1 recto-vaginal fistula and 1 rectovesical fistula. There were no anastomotic stenoses. CONCLUSIONS: There were two main advantages of using mechanical anastomosis: (1) the opportunity of palette broadening of laparoscopic operations, (2) the possibility of making safe anastomosis in difficult to access areas (rectum, esophagus). The use of mechanical staplers offers advantages especially in patients with rectal tumors, especially in obese male patients with narrow basin, where we can save many cases from rectal amputation. Staplers bring more comfort to the surgeon offering physical and psychological feeling of a perfect anastomosis. Although staplers cost is high, in selected cases, this disadvantage is offset by reducing the duration of operations, hospitalization and subsequent cost of stomas maintenance.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/instrumentation , Surgical Staplers , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Female , Gastrectomy/instrumentation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Romania , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Staplers/economics , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Surgical Stapling/economics , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 98(5): 405-10, 2003.
Article in Romanian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14999967

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Miniinvasive treatment can be used in many early complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this article are analyzed the indications and the efficiency of these techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed here a group of 9542 laparoscopic cholecystectomy operated in 9 years. The main postoperative complications were: bile leak (54 cases), haemorrhage (15 cases), subhepatic abscess (10 cases) and early diagnosed remnant lithiasis of CBD (11 cases). Miniinvasive techniques that were used were laparoscopic reinterventions (15 cases) and EST (22 cases). RESULTS: Classic reinterventions were practiced in 28.88% of cases with complications. Miniinvasive techniques were used in 42.2% of cases with complications: laparoscopic reinterventions (15 cases) for choleperitoneum, haemoperitoneum and subhepatic abscess and EST (22 cases) for prolonged bile leak on subhepatic drain and for early diagnosed remnant lithiasis of CBD. All cases were healed. DISCUSSION: Along with a precise diagnosis and a good indication, the miniinvasive treatment of complications proved to have good results, converting the bad operative outcome into a postoperative success.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Hemobilia/surgery , Liver Abscess/surgery , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholelithiasis/complications , Cholelithiasis/surgery , Hemobilia/etiology , Humans , Liver Abscess/etiology , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...