[Mass maritime casualty incidents in German waters: structures and resources]. / Massenanfall von Verletzten auf See in deutschen Gewässern : Strukturen und Ressourcen.

The Central Command for Maritime Emergencies was founded in Germany in 2003 triggered by the fire on board of the cargo ship "Pallas" in 1998. Its mission is to coordinate and direct measures at or above state level in maritime emergency situations in the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. A special task in this case is to provide firefighting and medical care. To face these challenges at sea emergency doctors and firemen have been specially trained. This form of organization provides a concept to counter mass casualty incidents and peril situations at sea. Since the foundation of the Central Command for Maritime Emergencies there have been 5 operations for firefighting units and 4 for medical response teams. Assignments and structure of the Central Command for Maritime Emergencies are unique in Europe.

[Acute subglottic tracheal stenosis after resuscitation]. / Akute subglottische Trachealstenose nach Reanimation.

Following cardiac arrest a 41-year-old patient was resuscitated for 40 min and required mechanical ventilation for 27.5 h. Acute shortness of breath and inspiratory stridor developed 7 days after successful extubation. Bronchoscopy revealed a subtotal tracheal stenosis caused by extensive fibrinous membranes. Local ischaemia caused by cuff pressure seems to be a likely explanation with an additional component of general hypoperfusion and haemodynamic instability which led to gastric bleeding (classification according to Forrest IIc) from ischaemic ulcers.

Optimal Response to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in early defibrillation access, key to the "Chain of Survival", will depend on innovations in defibrillation waveforms, because of their impact on device size and weight. This study compared standard monophasic waveform automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) to an innovative biphasic waveform AED. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Impedance-compensated biphasic truncated exponential (ICBTE) and either monophasic truncated exponential (MTE) or monophasic damped sine (MDS) AEDs were prospectively, randomly assigned by date in four emergency medical services. The study design compared ICBTE with MTE and MDS combined. This subset analysis distinguishes between the two classes of monophasic waveform, MTE and MDS, and compares their performance to each other and to the biphasic waveform, contingent on significant overall effects (ICBTE vs. MTE vs. MDS). Primary endpoint: Defibrillation efficacy with < or =3 shocks. Secondary endpoints: shock efficacy with < or =1 shock, < or =2 shocks, and survival to hospital admission and discharge. Observations included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), refibrillation, and time to first shock and to first successful shock. RESULTS: Of 338 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 115 had a cardiac aetiology, presented with ventricular fibrillation, and were shocked by an AED. Defibrillation efficacy for the first "stack" of up to 3 shocks, for up to 2 shocks and for the first shock alone was superior for the ICBTE waveform than for either the MTE or the MDS waveform, while there was no difference between the efficacy of MTE and MDS. Time from the beginning of analysis by the AED to the first shock and to the first successful shock was also superior for the ICBTE devices compared to either the MTE or the MDS devices, while again there was no difference between the MTE and MDS devices. More ICBTE patients achieved ROSC pre-hospital than did MTE patients. While the rates of ROSC were identical for MTE and MDS patients, the difference between ICBTE and MDS was not significant. Rates of refibrillation and survival to hospital admission and discharge did not differ among the three populations. CONCLUSIONS: ICBTE was superior to MTE and MDS in defibrillation efficacy and speed and to MTE in ROSC. MTE and MDS did not differ in efficacy. There were no differences among the waveforms in refibrillation or survival.

[Psychiatric emergencies in the physician-based system of a German city]. / Psychiatrische Notfälle im Notarztdienst einer deutschen Grossstadt.

OBJECTIVE: Pre-clinical Psychiatric Emergency Situations (PES) gain more scientific interest. First investigations revealed them to be the third major cause for emergency physician (EP) calls. However, there is still very little data concerning prevalence, diagnosis and therapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all anonymised EP protocols of the year 1995 in the city of Hamburg was performed. Data of each multiple-choice category was evaluated as well as handwritten and personal notes to determine prevalence, diagnoses and therapy of PES. RESULTS: 2550 out of 26,347 protocols (9.7%) revealed to have a psychiatric disturbance as a major cause for the call. The most frequent diagnoses in the overall young (average age: 43.1 +/- 17.6 years) and male (60.3%) population were found to be alcoholic intoxication (34%), state of agitation (23%) and suicide attempts (22%). In 55% the emergencies could be considered as purely psychiatric; in 35% as a combined somatic-psychiatric emergency. A specific psychopharmacological treatment was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric patients are a considerable group in pre-clinical emergency medicine, however, disturbances are much too rarely documented, diagnosed and treated. Training programs are necessary. Psychiatry has to play a more active role in planning and performing these programs.

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of 150-J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we compared an automatic external defibrillator (AED) that delivers 150-J biphasic shocks with traditional high-energy (200- to 360-J) monophasic AEDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: AEDs were prospectively randomized according to defibrillation waveform on a daily basis in 4 emergency medical services systems. Defibrillation efficacy, survival to hospital admission and discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and neurological status at discharge (cerebral performance category) were compared. Of 338 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 115 had a cardiac etiology, presented with ventricular fibrillation, and were shocked with an AED. The time from the emergency call to the first shock was 8.9+/-3.0 (mean+/-SD) minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The 150-J biphasic waveform defibrillated at higher rates, resulting in more patients who achieved a return of spontaneous circulation. Although survival rates to hospital admission and discharge did not differ, discharged patients who had been resuscitated with biphasic shocks were more likely to have good cerebral performance.