Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Rev Esp Salud Publica ; 932019 Mar 25.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907380

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are chronic and highly disabling diseases that share inflammatory sequences and immunological dysregulations. Considered as a disease in itself, the prevalence of IMID is virtually unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of 10 selected UDI, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, hidradenitis suppurativa, sarcoidosis and uveitis in Spain. METHODS: cross-sectional epidemiological study of point prevalence was made. This study was carried out through a series of computerized interviews in households chosen at random in 17 autonomous communities in Spain. A structured questionnaire was used to determine the frequency of diagnosis and the concurrence of 10 IMID in the respondents and other individuals belonging to the same family nucleus. The point prevalence estimates were used and compared with the objective of determining the frequency of IMID by age, sex and communities. The data were processed using Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and the SPSS V.019 system (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) for statistical analysis using the usual statistical tests in this type of studies. RESULTS: Of the 7,980 respondents, 510 were diagnosed with an IMID, representing a cross-sectional study of 6.39% (95% CI: 6.02-6.76). One, two, three or more members of the family were affected in 87.2%, 7.8% and 5% of positive relatives in IMID, respectively. The most recurrent diseases were psoriasis (2.69% [95% CI: 2.32-3.06]) and rheumatic arthritis (1.07% [95% CI: 0.70-1.44]). There were differences in prevalence due to sex (p = 0.004) and age (p = 0.000). No significant differences were identified related to geographic location (p = 0.819). Attendance of at least 2 IMID was reported in 8.9% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence was of the IMID studied was 6.39%, psoriasis being the most frequent with 2.69%. This study constitutes an initial step to consider IMID as an independent disease within the health system..


OBJETIVO: Las enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas (IMID) son enfermedades crónicas y altamente discapacitantes que comparten secuencias inflamatorias y desregulaciones inmunológicas. Considerada como una enfermedad en sí, la prevalencia de la IMID es prácticamente desconocida. El objetivo de este trabajo fue valorar la prevalencia de 10 IMID seleccionadas, incluyendo artritis reumatoide, psoriasis, artritis psoriásica, espondilitis anquilosante, colitis ulcerosa, enfermedad de Crohn, lupus eritematoso sistémico, hidrosadenitis supurativa, sarcoidosis y uveítis en España. METODOS: Se hizo un estudio epidemiológico transversal de prevalencia puntual. Este estudio llevó a cabo a través de una serie de entrevistas informatizadas en hogares elegidos al azar en 17 comunidades autónomas en España. Mediante un cuestionario estructurado se determinó la frecuencia de diagnóstico y las concurrencias de 10 IMID en los encuestados y otros individuos pertenecientes al mismo núcleo familiar. Las estimaciones de prevalencia pun- tual se utilizaron y compararon con el objetivo de determinar la frecuencia de IMID por edad, sexo y comunidades. Los datos fueron procesados utilizando el programa Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) y el sistema SPSS V.019 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) para el análisis estadístico utilizando los test estadísticos habituales en este tipo de estudios. RESULTADOS: De los 7.980 encuestados, 510 fueron diagnosticados con una IMID, lo que representa un estudio transversal de un 6,39% (95% ci: 6,02-6,76). Uno, dos, tres o más miembros de la familia estaban afectados en un 87,2%, 7,8% y 5% de familiares positivos en IMID, respectivamente. Las enfermedades más recurrentes fueron psoriasis (2,69% [95% ci: 2,32-3,06]) y artritis reumática (1,07% [95% ci:0,70-1,44]). Se observaron diferencias en la prevalencia debidas al sexo (p=0,004) y edad (p=0,000). No se identificaron diferencias significativas relacionadas con la localización geográfica (p=0,819). Se reportó concurrencia de al menos 2 IMID en un 8,9% de encuestados. CONCLUSIONES: La prevalencia global fue de las IMID estudiadas fue del 6,39 % siendo las mas frecuentes la psoriasis con el 2,69%. Este estudio constituye un paso inicial para considerar la IMID como una enfermedad independiente dentro del sistema sanitario.


Subject(s)
Arthritis/epidemiology , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Sarcoidosis/epidemiology , Uveitis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis/immunology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/immunology , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Sarcoidosis/immunology , Spain/epidemiology , Uveitis/immunology , Young Adult
2.
Rev. esp. salud pública ; 93: 0-0, 2019. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-189519

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Las enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas (IMID) son enfermedades crónicas y altamente discapacitantes que comparten secuencias inflamatorias y desregulaciones inmunológicas. Considerada como una enfermedad en sí, la prevalencia de la IMID es prácticamente desconocida. El objetivo de este trabajo fue valorar la prevalencia de 10 IMID seleccionadas, incluyendo artritis reumatoide, psoriasis, artritis psoriásica, espondilitis anquilosante, colitis ulcerosa, enfermedad de Crohn, lupus eritematoso sistémico, hidrosadenitis supurativa, sarcoidosis y uveítis en España. MÉTODOS: Se hizo un estudio epidemiológico transversal de prevalencia puntual. Este estudio llevó a cabo a través de una serie de entrevistas informatizadas en hogares elegidos al azar en 17 comunidades autónomas en España. Mediante un cuestionario estructurado se determinó la frecuencia de diagnóstico y las concurrencias de 10 IMID en los encuestados y otros individuos pertenecientes al mismo núcleo familiar. Las estimaciones de prevalencia puntual se utilizaron y compararon con el objetivo de determinar la frecuencia de IMID por edad, sexo y comunidades. Los datos fueron procesados utilizando el programa Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) y el sistema SPSS V.019 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) para el análisis estadístico utilizando los test estadísticos habituales en este tipo de estudios. RESULTADOS: De los 7.980 encuestados, 510 fueron diagnosticados con una IMID, lo que representa un estudio transversal de un 6,39% (95% ci: 6,02-6,76). Uno, dos, tres o más miembros de la familia estaban afectados en un 87,2%, 7,8% y 5% de familiares positivos en IMID, respectivamente. Las enfermedades más recurrentes fueron psoriasis (2,69% [95% ci: 2,32-3,06]) y artritis reumática (1,07% [95% ci:0,70-1,44]). Se observaron diferencias en la prevalencia debidas al sexo (p=0,004) y edad (p=0,000). No se identificaron diferencias significativas relacionadas con la localización geográfica (p=0,819). Se reportó concurrencia de al menos 2 IMID en un 8,9% de encuestados. CONCLUSIONES: La prevalencia global fue de las IMID estudiadas fue del 6,39 % siendo las mas frecuentes la psoriasis con el 2,69%. Este estudio constituye un paso inicial para considerar la IMID como una enfermedad independiente dentro del sistema sanitario


OBJECTIVE: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) are chronic and highly disabling diseases that share inflammatory sequences and immunological dysregulations. Considered as a disease in itself, the prevalence of IMID is virtually unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of 10 selected UDI, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, hidradenitis suppurativa, sarcoidosis and uveitis in Spain. METHODS: cross-sectional epidemiological study of point prevalence was made. This study was carried out through a series of computerized interviews in households chosen at random in 17 autonomous communities in Spain. A structured questionnaire was used to determine the frequency of diagnosis and the concurrence of 10 IMID in the respondents and other individuals belonging to the same family nucleus. The point prevalence estimates were used and compared with the objective of determining the frequency of IMID by age, sex and communities. The data were processed using Excel 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and the SPSS V.019 system (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) for statistical analysis using the usual statistical tests in this type of studies. RESULTS: Of the 7,980 respondents, 510 were diagnosed with an IMID, representing a cross-sectional study of 6.39% (95% CI: 6.02-6.76). One, two, three or more members of the family were affected in 87.2%, 7.8% and 5% of positive relatives in IMID, respectively. The most recurrent diseases were psoriasis (2.69% [95% CI: 2.32-3.06]) and rheumatic arthritis (1.07% [95% CI: 0.70-1.44]). There were differences in prevalence due to sex (p = 0.004) and age (p = 0.000). No significant differences were identified related to geographic location (p = 0.819). Attendance of at least 2 IMID was reported in 8.9% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence was of the IMID studied was 6.39%, psoriasis being the most frequent with 2.69%. This study constitutes an initial step to consider IMID as an independent disease within the health system


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthritis/epidemiology , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Sarcoidosis/epidemiology , Uveitis/epidemiology , Arthritis/immunology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/immunology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Prevalence , Sarcoidosis/immunology , Spain/epidemiology , Uveitis/immunology
3.
Toxicol Lett ; 197(1): 29-37, 2010 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20435104

ABSTRACT

In this work, we present a complete physicochemical characterization of multi-wall carbon nanotubes (mwCNTs) in order to assess their potential toxicological effects in in vitro cell models using Colony Forming Efficiency (CFE) assay. We verified that Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) was a more suitable solvent to disperse mwCNTs compared to culture medium guaranteeing reproducibility in the preparation of testing dilutions. The CFE assay was carried out on five mammalian cell lines representing the potentially exposed and/or target organs for nanomaterials (lung, liver, kidney, intestine, skin), as well as on mouse fibroblasts cell line, which usually is considered a sensitive model to verify in vitro cytotoxicity of test compounds. A statistically significant toxic effect was found only in human alveolar basal epithelial cells and immortalized mouse fibroblasts, for which the interaction between mwCNTs and cells was additionally studied by Atomic Force and Scanning Electron Microscopy. In this study, we considered and suggested the CFE assay as a promising test for screening studies of cytotoxicity. In addition, combining in vitro tests with physicochemical analysis, this work underlines basic points to be considered when research on nanomaterials has to be carried out, to set up, in our opinion, well-defined and suitable experimental planning and procedures.


Subject(s)
Colony-Forming Units Assay , Nanotubes, Carbon/toxicity , Toxicity Tests/methods , Animals , Cell Line , Humans , Kinetics , Mice , Microscopy, Atomic Force , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Nanotubes, Carbon/ultrastructure
4.
Eur Addict Res ; 16(1): 31-42, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19923837

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic impact of buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) as an agonist opioid treatment for opiate dependence. METHODS: A budgetary impact analysis model was designed to calculate the annual costs (drugs and associated costs) to the Spanish National Healthcare System of methadone versus B/N. Data for the model were obtained from official databases and expert panel opinion. RESULTS: It was estimated that 86,017 patients would be in an agonist opioid treatment program each of the 3 years of the study. No increase in the number of patients is expected with the introduction of B/N combination. The budgetary impact (drugs and associated costs) for agonist opiate treatment in the first year of the study would be 89.53 million EUR. In the first year of B/N use, the budgetary impact would rise by 4.39 million EUR (4.6% of the total impact), with an incremental cost of 0.79 million EUR (0.9% of the total impact). The budgetary increase would be 0.6% (0.48 million EUR increase) and 0.6% (0.49 million EUR increase) in the second and third years of use, respectively. The mean cost per patient in the first year with and without B/N would be EUR 1,050 and 1,041, respectively. The most influential variables in the sensitivity analysis were logistics and production costs of methadone and the percentage use of B/N. CONCLUSION: With an additional cost of only EUR 9 per patient, B/N is an efficient addition to the therapeutic arsenal in the drug treatment of opiate dependence, particularly when considering clinical aspects of novel pharmacotherapy.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/economics , Budgets , Buprenorphine/economics , Naloxone/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Budgets/methods , Buprenorphine/administration & dosage , Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination , Humans , Naloxone/administration & dosage , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology
5.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 73(3): 307-13, 2004 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15036553

ABSTRACT

A survey was carried out to evaluate the satisfaction with methadone treatment centres of methadone-maintained opioid-dependent patients from Spain. Independent interviewers asked 505 consecutively arriving clients from 20 randomly selected centres (14 conventional centres, two bus units, and four prisons) to participate; 370 (73.3%) clients agreed to fill out the questionnaire, and 351 (69.5%) completed it. Satisfaction was assessed using the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale for methadone treatment (VSSS-MT). The prison sub-sample (n=43) was excluded from overall analysis because survey acceptance and satisfaction was very different in prisons than in the other centres. Mean overall satisfaction in the non-prison sub-sample (n=308) was 3.5 (S.D.=0.6) on a 1-5 point scale (1=terrible; 5=excellent). The percentage of these clients who felt dissatisfied (VSSS-MT scores: < or =3) and satisfied (VSSS-MT scores: >3) was, by category: overall satisfaction, 15.9% dissatisfied, 84.1% satisfied; basic interventions, 16.0% versus 84.0%; specific interventions, 45.4% versus 54.6%; social worker skills, 33.8% versus 66.2%; psychologist skills, 38.5% versus 61.5%. The number of hours per week that the centre dispensed methadone was the only variable able to predict satisfaction. This regression model accounted for only 2.5% of the variance in VSSS-MT overall scores. These results show that Spanish clients are slightly satisfied with conventional centres and bus units, although they fail to detect specific variables that are strongly related to that satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Methadone/administration & dosage , Narcotics/administration & dosage , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health Services , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...