Endoscopic, bioptic, and manometric findings in eosinophilic esophagitis before and after steroid therapy: a case series.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Eosinophilic esophagitis can be associated with a wide range of endoscopic patterns. The aim of the present case series report is to describe and classify endoscopic appearances before and after corticoid therapy in relation to histopathology and manometry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 30 patients (m : f, 27 : 3; mean age 36.2 years) with eosinophilic esophagitis, endoscopic findings were prospectively classified according to luminal diameter and mucosal pattern. Manometric and bioptic histopathologic findings were also recorded. Endoscopy was repeated following a 3-month course of steroid therapy. RESULTS: In total, 20 % of patients showed a concentric esophageal stricture, and in 57 % simultaneous contraction rings were visible. Mucosal alterations consisted of granular mucosa (20 %), longitudinal furrows (33 %) and transversal undulations (3 %). Lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction and distal esophageal dysfunctional manometry were seen in 73 % and 57 % of cases, respectively. Following steroids, the esophagus showed a normal caliber in 97 % of patients, and 63 % of patients had normal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent findings were narrowing of the esophageal lumen, which returned to normal following steroid treatment to a larger extent than mucosal alterations.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults, an emerging cause of dysphagia. Description of 9 cases.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a rare condition mainly affecting children, although the number of cases reported in adults is on the increase. It is characterized by intense infiltration of eosinophilic leukocytes in the esophageal mucosa, without involvement of other sections of the alimentary canal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over the past year, following the performance of endoscopies and biopsies, our service identified nine patients who were diagnosed with suffering from this disorder. Each patient sought medical help for episodes of long-term, self-limited dysphagia or food impaction in the alimentary canal. RESULTS: Endoscopy revealed esophageal stenosis in the form of simultaneous contraction rings or regular stenosis. In six cases, the manometric study showed a nonspecific motor disorder of severe intensity affecting the esophageal body, and another patient had a disorder characterized by the presence of simultaneous waves and secondary peristaltic waves in the three thirds of the organ. These disorders are presumably due to eosinophilic infiltration of the muscular layer or ganglionar cells of the esophagus, and account for symptoms in these patients. Although the etiopathogenesis of this illness is uncertain, it is clearly an immunoallergic manifestation. CONCLUSIONS: As the number of diagnosed cases is on the increase, eosinophilic esophagitis is in adults a specific entity within the differential diagnosis of dysphagia in young males with a history of allergies. Eosiniphilic esophagitis responds in a different number of ways to therapies used. We successfully used fluticasone propionate, a synthetic corticoid applied topically, which proved to be efficient in the treatment of this illness by acting on the pathophysiological basis of the process. It does not have any adverse effects, thus offering advantages over other therapies such as systematic corticoids or endoscopic dilations.