The role of personality, coping style and social support in health-related quality of life in HIV infection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of health status, personality and coping style, on self-report health-related quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Participants were HIV seropositive individuals at all disease stages from three samples (a) gay/bisexual men from the UK, (b) injecting drug users from the UK, (c) injecting drug users from Italy. All participants completed questionnaires evaluating QoL, personality, coping style and social support. Explicit models of the relationships between the measured variables based on a review of the literature were tested using structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Health status was modestly associated with the physical but not the psychological aspects of QoL (beta = 0.44). Neuroticism was strongly associated with psychological QoL (beta = -0.73) but only weakly with physical QoL (beta = -0.21). The samples did not differ in either the pattern or the magnitude of these relationships. Mediating factors such as coping style, social support and other personality variables had only a weak influence on the role of Neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroticism had a strong influence on health-related QoL that was independent of health status. Neuroticism was more strongly associated with the psychological aspects of QoL than health status. Coping styles and the other psychological variables assessed had only a weak mediating influence on this relationship.

Knowledge of HIV/AIDS and emotional adjustment in a cohort of men with haemophilia and HIV infection: final report.

This study presents the final report of a long-term psychological assessment of men with haemophilia and HIV infection. The knowledge, emotional impact regarding HIV infection and prospective changes over time and the need for psychological support were evaluated. The study group comprised 118 men with haemophilia, 66 HIV seropositive and 52 seronegative, from the Haemophilia Centres in Bari, Florence, Milan and Naples. All subjects performed psychological tests (STAI: state and trait anxiety inventory; SDS: self-rating depression scale) and completed questionnaires to ascertain their knowledge and the emotional impact of AIDS. After enrollment (1992-93) the assessment was repeated twice over a 2-year period. A high percentage of subjects in both groups answered the questionnaire on knowledge correctly and, more specifically, all (100%) admitted knowing that sexual intercourse was a risk factor for HIV infection, adding that sexual partners of haemophiliacs with HIV should be regularly tested. The percentage, however, decreased for seropositives who admitted to always using a condom during sexual intercourse (86%) and for those who declared that partners were periodically tested for HIV (60%). The most important feature of the study is that, contrary to predicted expectations, seropositive and seronegative subjects presented the same degree of emotional involvement: there are no statistically significant differences in average scores between groups either on the anxiety or depression scales. Moreover, for certain aspects, seronegatives revealed greater emotional involvement: at baseline evaluation, they felt more fear and unhappiness with statistically significant differences compared to asymptomatics. Furthermore, seronegatives more than seropositives continue to feel reluctance towards infusion and avoid blood products after learning of AIDS. These results emphasize the importance of paying due attention to the emotional status of seronegatives. Their reluctance towards the use of blood products (despite present safety) is a very important issue for the possible consequences of treatment with the risk of worsening the clinical condition. In conclusion, we believe that counselling on HIV infection/AIDS needs to address every person with haemophilia regardless of HIV status.