Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 117(4): 431-436, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36049100

ABSTRACT

Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still considered as one of the most aggressive cancers with low percentages of respectability, despite recent advances in diagnosis. Assessment of preoperative inflammatory markers can increase the rates of resectability. Methods: Patients with potentially resectable pancreatic adenoinvesticarcinoma in a single pancreatic unit were included. Ninety-six patient during a one year period were eligible for analysis. Results: CRP, d-dimers, and fibrinogen levels were similar between the two groups. On the contrary, there were statistically significant differences regarding the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Conclusions: inflammatory markers can act as an additional tool in predicting resectability in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Biomarkers , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Pancreatic Neoplasms
2.
Ann Surg ; 275(4): 663-672, 2022 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34596077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The ISGPS aimed to develop a universally accepted definition for PPAP for standardized reporting and outcome comparison. BACKGROUND: PPAP is an increasingly recognized complication after partial pancreatic resections, but its incidence and clinical impact, and even its existence are variable because an internationally accepted consensus definition and grading system are lacking. METHODS: The ISGPS developed a consensus definition and grading of PPAP with its members after an evidence review and after a series of discussions and multiple revisions from April 2020 to May 2021. RESULTS: We defined PPAP as an acute inflammatory condition of the pancreatic remnant beginning within the first 3 postoperative days after a partial pancreatic resection. The diagnosis requires (1) a sustained postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) greater than the institutional upper limit of normal for at least the first 48 hours postoperatively, (2) associated with clinically relevant features, and (3) radiologic alterations consistent with PPAP. Three different PPAP grades were defined based on the clinical impact: (1) grade postoperative hyperamylasemia, biochemical changes only; (2) grade B, mild or moderate complications; and (3) grade C, severe life-threatening complications. DISCUSSIONS: The present definition and grading scale of PPAP, based on biochemical, radiologic, and clinical criteria, are instrumental for a better understanding of PPAP and the spectrum of postoperative complications related to this emerging entity. The current terminology will serve as a reference point for standard assessment and lend itself to developing specific treatments and prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Hyperamylasemia , Pancreatitis , Acute Disease , Humans , Hyperamylasemia/diagnosis , Hyperamylasemia/etiology , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatitis/diagnosis , Pancreatitis/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Propylamines
3.
Surgery ; 168(1): 101-105, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32183994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery provides globally accepted definitions for reporting of complications after pancreatic surgery. This International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project aims to provide a standardized framework for reporting of the results of operative treatment for chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: An International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project circulation list was created with pre-existing and new members and including gastroenterologists in addition to surgeons. A computerized search of the literature was undertaken for articles reporting the operative treatment of chronic pancreatitis. The results of the literature search were presented at the first face-to-face meeting of this International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery project group. A document outlining proposed reporting standards was produced by discussion during an initial meeting of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. An electronic questionnaire was then sent to all current members of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Responses were collated and further discussed at international meetings in North America, Europe, and at the International Association of Pancreatology World Congress in 2019. A final consensus document was produced by integration of multiple iterations. RESULTS: The International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery consensus standards for reporting of surgery in chronic pancreatitis recommends 4 core domains and the necessary variables needed for reporting of results: clinical baseline before operation; the morphology of the diseased gland; a new, standardized, operative terminology; and a minimum outcome dataset. The 4 domains combine to give a comprehensive framework for reports. CONCLUSION: Adoption of the 4 domains of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery reporting standards for surgery for chronic pancreatitis will facilitate comparison of results between centers and help to improve the care for patients with this debilitating disease.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Pancreaticojejunostomy , Pancreatitis, Chronic/surgery , Humans , Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatitis, Chronic/pathology
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29682625

ABSTRACT

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) present a challenging problem for physicians dealing with pancreatic disorders. Their management demands the co-operation of surgeons, radiologists and gastroenterologists. Historically, they have been treated either conservatively or surgically, with acceptable rates of complications and recurrence. However, recent advances in radiology and endoscopy, have leaded physicians to implement percutaneous and endoscopic drainage (ED) into their treatment algorithms. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery, with its advantages, has become an attractive alternative choice when surgical drainage (SD) is required. The aim of this review is to summarize the main diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the management of pseudocysts and to present the main studies that compare the three different types of pseudocyst drainage.

5.
Pan Afr Med J ; 31: 157, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31065317

ABSTRACT

Seed bezoars are a subcategory of phytobezoars, caused by consumption of indigestible vegetable or fruit seeds. We present the case of a 64-year-old male patient, who presented at the Emergency Department, complaining of constipation, tenesmus and rectal pain. History and digital examination revealed a rectal seed bezoar due to sunflower seeds, impacted in the lower rectum. The patient underwent manual disimpaction under general anaesthesia, after conservative measures failed. Seed bezoars represent a different pathophysiological process compared to fibre bezoars. They are usually found in the rectum of patients without predisposing factors, causing constipation and anorectal pain. History taking and digital rectal examination are the cornerstones of diagnosis, with manual disimpaction under general anaesthesia being the procedure of choice.


Subject(s)
Bezoars/diagnosis , Constipation/etiology , Fecal Impaction/etiology , Bezoars/complications , Bezoars/therapy , Constipation/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Helianthus , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Seeds/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...