Is non-operative management of severe blunt splenic injury safer than embolization or surgery? Results from a French prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The management of the severe blunt splenic injuries remains debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of splenic injury according to severity and management (surgery, embolization, non-operative management [NOM]). METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted including patients aged 16 years and older with diagnosed splenic injury. We evaluated severity according to the AAST classification, the presence of hemoperitoneum or a contrast blush on initial CT scan. The initial hemodynamic status, patients co-morbidities, the ISS (injury severity score), management and morbidity were also noted. RESULTS: Between May 2010 and May 2012, 91 patients were included. Thirty-seven patients (41%) had mild splenic injury (AAST I or II and a small hemoperitoneum) while 54 patients (59%) had severe splenic injury (AAST III or greater). The management included 18 splenectomies (20%), 15 embolizations (16%). Among 67 patients undergoing NOM without initial embolization, five (7%) developed secondary bleeding, five required surgery and nine underwent secondary embolization. No patient died and morbidity was 44% (n=40), 13% for mild injuries vs. 65% for severe injuries (P<0.01). For severe injuries, total morbidity was 58% after NOM, 73% after embolization and 70% after surgery. Specific morbidity related to the management was 10% after NOM vs. 47% after embolization (P=0.02). Specific morbidity after surgery was 15%. CONCLUSION: Embolization, because of its important specific morbidity, should not be performed as a prophylactic measure, but only in presence of clinical or laboratory signs of bleeding.

Splenic injury: management in the Languedoc-Roussillon region.

GOAL OF STUDY: Treatment of splenic injury is not standardized. We conducted an inventory of splenic injury treatment modalities of splenic injury in the Languedoc-Roussillon region of France. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent by e-mail to 33 surgeons practicing in 10 hospitals in that region. Surgeons were asked: how many cases were treated per year (PMSI databank for the last three years), local resources (resuscitation bay or intensive care unit, availability of CT and interventional radiology), indications (surgery, embolization, nonoperative management [NOM]), prognostic criteria, NOM modalities (duration of bed rest, hospital stay, restriction of physical activity, thromboembolic prophylaxis, and imaging schedule). RESULTS: Thirty-one surgeons replied. An average of 185 patients were treated per year. There was consensus concerning the indication for urgent splenectomy, NOM was practiced in the stable patient (even with diffuse hemoperitoneum) and splenic artery embolization was performed for active bleeding (blush on CT) (for the six centers who have interventional radiology at their disposal). Disparities existed between centers concerning the modalities of NOM excepting imaging monitoring, initial surveillance in resuscitation bay or intensive care and in the therapeutic indications when bleeding persisted. CONCLUSION: Based on the consensus observed in this study and an analysis of the literature, a uniform treatment policy can be proposed.

Vestigial retrorectal cystic tumors in adults: a review of 30 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Retrorectal tumors are uncommon. This is a report on a series of vestigial retrorectal cystic tumors in adults that were surgically removed at two medical centers in France. We also assessed the significance of imaging and, in particular, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of these lesions. METHODS: The medical files of adult patients operated on for vestigial retrorectal cystic tumors over the past 15 years were retrospectively studied and, in particular, the radiological studies, the treatment and the histopathology. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent surgery for vestigial retrorectal cystic tumor. A preoperative diagnosis was possible in almost all cases. The surgical procedure was justified by preoperative imaging and included the transanal approach (three cases), posterior approach (23 cases), anterior approach (two cases) and combined posterior and anterior approach (two cases). Imaging can identify a multilobular lesion that may require the use of a coccygeal approach to achieve complete resection. During a mean follow-up of 3.2 years (range 0.5-15 years), two patients had a local recurrence (successfully surgically removed), and a further two patients were lost to follow-up. Only one lesion was malignant. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative imaging, and especially magnetic resonance imaging, enables both a specific diagnosis and the selection of the optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of vestigial retrorectal cystic tumors in adults.