Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Purpose: To study the efficacy and toxic effects of bepotastine besilate 1.5% preservative-free (BB-PF) and olopatadine 0.2% BAK-preserved (OL-BAK) drops on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Patients and Methods: Ninety-seven patients with allergic conjunctivitis diagnosis participated in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients received either BB-PF (n=48) or OL-BAK (n=49), both administered once daily in the morning. The patients were followed for 60 days. Ocular itching was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included ocular symptoms, signs, and non-ocular symptoms associated with rhinoconjunctivitis. Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) was performed to evaluate histopathological changes related to the toxic effects of preservatives. Results: BB-PF treatment was associated with a 1.30 more probability of diminished ocular itching than OL-BAK (odds ratio (OR)=1.30; 95% CI=(0.96-1.7); p=0.086). No statistically significant differences were found between treatments in the resolution of other ocular symptoms or signs, except for tearing, which was superior in the BB-PF (OR=1.37; 95% (1.26-1.47); p<0.0001). BB-PF was superior in terms of the resolution of rhinorrhea (p=0.040) and nasal itching (p=0.037). After 60 days of treatment, the BB-PF group exhibited 2.0 times higher probability of having a lower Nelson scale score compared to the OL-BAK group (OR=2.00; 95% CI=(1.19-3.34); p=0.010). Conclusion: Both medications presented a similar efficacy in terms of the resolution of ocular signs and symptoms associated with ocular conjunctivitis. BB-PF is superior in the resolution of non-ocular symptoms and safer for the ocular surface than OL-BAK.

A novel ophthalmic latanoprost 0.005% nanoemulsion: a cytotoxicity study.

BACKGROUND: Benzalkonium chloride (BAK), the most commonly used preservative in anti-glaucoma eye drops, inflicts damage to the ocular surface. A novel anti-glaucoma formulation that avoids the use of BAK has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of this formulation and to compare it with an ophthalmic solution containing BAK. METHODS: Two different latanoprost eye drops were used: one ophthalmic solution (LSc) containing BAK 0.02% and one ophthalmic nanoemulsion (LNe) with a soft preservative (potassium sorbate 0.18%). Human epithelial conjunctival cells were incubated for 15, 30, and 60 min with either LSc or LNe. The cytotoxicity was determined by MTT assay. Cell death was measured by flow cytometry using annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide. RESULTS: The values of cell viability and proliferation obtained from cells exposed to LNe were between 80 and 90% relative to the control group, whereas values obtained from cells exposed to LSc were around 30% at all study times (p < 0.05 at 15 and 30 min; p < 0.01 at 60 min). The percentage of viable cells decreased significantly when cells were incubated with LSc compared with cells incubated with LNe at all the study times, while the percentage of cells in late apoptosis/necrosis increased significantly in cells exposed to LSc compared to LNe. CONCLUSIONS: The new latanoprost nanoemulsion is significantly less cytotoxic on human conjunctival cells than LSc. These results suggest that the new formulation might be gentler on the eye surface than currently available BAK-preserved latanoprost solutions.

Difluprednate 0.05% twice a day vs prednisolone acetate 1% 4 times a day for cataract postsurgical inflammation treatment: noninferiority trial.

PURPOSE: To establish whether difluprednate 0.05% nanoemulsion (DIFL) twice a day is as effective as prednisolone acetate 1% + phenylephrine hydrochloride 0.12% suspension (PRED) 4 times a day for postsurgical inflammation treatment. SETTING: 4 private Argentine ophthalmological centers. DESIGN: Noninferiority, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, comparative trial. METHODS: A total of 259 patients who underwent phacoemulsification randomly received DIFL or PRED, starting the day before surgery and continuing for 28 days. The primary endpoint was central corneal thickness. Noninferior anti-inflammatory efficacy was considered if the difference of corneal thickness between baseline and day 4 did not differ beyond 17 µm between treatments. Secondary endpoints were cell and flare, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), endothelial cell count, optical coherence tomography (OCT) central macular thickness, and intraocular pressure. All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and day 1, 4, and 28 postoperatively. RESULTS: 225 patients finished the study. The difference in corneal thickness at baseline and day 4 did not differ beyond 17 µm between treatments (95% CI -2.78 µm to 14.84 µm), with no statistically significant difference ( P = .523). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in total anterior chamber clearance at any study timepoint ( P > .05). Moreover, no statistically significant differences were reported between treatments in CDVA ( P = .455), endothelial cell count ( P = .811), OCT central macular thickness ( P = .869), and intraocular pressure outcome ( P = .316). CONCLUSIONS: Difluprednate administered twice a day was at least as effective as prednisolone acetate administered 4 times a day for inflammatory treatment after cataract surgery.