Evaluation of a novel gel-based ureteral stent with biofilm-resistant characteristics.

PURPOSE: Current ureteral stents, while effective at maintaining a ureteral lumen, provide a substrate for bacterial growth. This propensity for biofilm formation may be a nidus for bacterial growth leading to infection and a reason for early removal of a stent before it is clinically indicated. A newly devised stent, composed of a highly hydrated, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile polymer, is believed to have bacterial resistant properties. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biofilm growth and bacterial resistant properties of this novel stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple 1 cm sections of the pAguaMedicina™ Pediatric Ureteral Stent (pAMS) (Q Urological, Natick, MA) and the conventional polymer stent (SS) (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) were incubated for 3 days in the 3 different growth media. Afterward, J96 human pathogenic Escherichia coli was added. At 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days following bacterial inoculation, the stent segments were washed, sonicated, and analyzed for bacterial growth. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed to assess biofilm formation. RESULTS: pAMS demonstrated significant reductions (43-71 %) in bacterial counts when compared to standard stents in all conditions tested. SEM imaging demonstrated biofilm formation on both types of stents in all media, with a relative reduction in apparent cell debris and bacteria on the pAMS. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the gel-based stent shows a demonstrable reduction in bacterial counts and biofilm formation. The use of the pAMS may reduce the risk of infection associated with stent usage.

Risk factors for urinary tract infection after renal transplantation and its impact on graft function in children and young adults.

PURPOSE: Urinary tract infection will develop in 40% of children who undergo renal transplantation. Post-transplant urinary tract infection is associated with earlier graft loss in adults. However, the impact on graft function in the pediatric population is less well-known. Additionally the risk factors for post-transplant urinary tract infection in children have not been well elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between pre-transplant and post-transplant urinary tract infections on graft outcome, and the risk factors for post-transplant urinary tract infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 87 patients underwent renal transplantation between July 2001 and July 2006. Patient demographics, cause of renal failure, graft outcome, and presence of pre-transplant and post-transplant urinary tract infections were recorded. Graft outcome was based on last creatinine and nephrological assessment. RESULTS: Median followup was 3.12 years. Of the patients 15% had pre-transplant and 32% had post-transplant urinary tract infections. Good graft function was seen in 60% of the patients and 21% had failed function. Graft function did not correlate with a history of pre-transplant or post-transplant urinary tract infection (p >0.2). Of transplanted patients with urological causes of renal failure 57% had post-transplant urinary tract infection, compared to only 20% of those with a medical etiology of renal failure (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study there was no correlation between a history of urinary tract infection (either before or after transplant) and decreased graft function. History of pre-transplant urinary tract infection was suggestive of urinary tract infection after transplant. Patients with urological causes of renal failure may be at increased risk for post-transplant urinary tract infection.