Identification and Characterization of a Secondary Sodium-Binding Site and the Main Selectivity Determinants in the Human Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter 3.

The family of concentrative Na+/nucleoside cotransporters in humans is constituted by three subtypes, namely, hCNT1, hCNT2, and hCNT3. Besides their different nucleoside selectivity, hCNT1 and hCNT2 have a Na+/nucleoside stoichiometry of 1:1, while for hCNT3 it is 2:1. This distinct stoichiometry of subtype 3 might hint the existence of a secondary sodium-binding site that is not present in the other two subtypes, but to date their three-dimensional structures remain unknown and the residues implicated in Na+ binding are unclear. In this work, we have identified and characterized the Na+ binding sites of hCNT3 by combining molecular modeling and mutagenesis studies. A model of the transporter was obtained by homology modeling, and key residues of two sodium-binding sites were identified and verified with a mutagenesis strategy. The structural model explains the altered sodium-binding properties of the hCNT3C602R polymorphic variant and supports previously generated data identifying the determinant residues of nucleoside selectivity, paving the way to understand how drugs can target this plasma membrane transporter.

Role of SLC22A1 polymorphic variants in drug disposition, therapeutic responses, and drug-drug interactions.

The SCL22A1 gene encodes the broad selectivity transporter hOCT1. hOCT1 is expressed in most epithelial barriers thereby contributing to drug pharmacokinetics. It is also expressed in different drug target cells, including immune system cells and others. Thus, this membrane protein might also contribute to drug pharmacodynamics. Up to 1000 hOCT1 polymorphisms have been identified so far, although only a small fraction of those have been mechanistically studied. A paradigm in the field of drug transporter pharmacogenetics is the impact of hOCT1 gene variability on metformin clinical parameters, affecting area under the concentration-time curve, Cmax and responsiveness. However, hOCT1 also mediates the translocation of a variety of drugs used as anticancer, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antiemetic agents as well as drugs used in the treatment of neurological diseases among. This review focuses exclusively on those drugs for which some pharmacogenetic data are available, and aims at highlighting the need for further clinical research in this area.

Human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1) as a mediator of bendamustine uptake and cytotoxicity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells.

Bendamustine is used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Routes for bendamustine entry into target cells are unknown. This study aimed at identifying transporter proteins implicated in bendamustine uptake. Our results showed that hOCT1 is a bendamustine transporter, as bendamustine could cis-inhibit the uptake of a canonical hOCT1 substrate, with a Ki in the micromolar range, consistent with the EC50 values of the cytotoxicity triggered by this drug in HEK293 cells expressing hOCT1. hOCT1 polymorphic variants determining impaired bendamustine-transporter interaction, consistently reduced bendamustine cytotoxicity in HEK293 cells stably expressing them. Exome genotyping of the SLC22A1 gene, encoding hOCT1, was undertaken in a cohort of 241 CLL patients. Ex vivo cytotoxicity to bendamustine was measured in a subset of cases and shown to correlate with SLC22A1 polymorphic variants. In conclusion, hOCT1 is a suitable bendamustine transporter, thereby contributing to its cytotoxic effect depending upon the hOCT1 genetic variants expressed.

Nucleoside transporters and human organic cation transporter 1 determine the cellular handling of DNA-methyltransferase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), such as azacytidine, decitabine and zebularine, are used for the epigenetic treatment of cancer. Their action may depend upon their translocation across the plasma membrane. The aim of this study was to identify transporter proteins contributing to DNMT inhibitor action. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Drug interactions with selected hCNT and hENT proteins were studied in transiently transfected HeLa and MDCK cells. Interaction with human organic cation transporters (hOCTs) was assessed in transiently transfected HeLa cells and Xenopus laevis oocytes. KEY RESULTS: Zebularine uptake was mediated by hCNT1, hCNT3 and hENT2. Decitabine interacted with but was not translocated by any nucleoside transporter (NT) type. hCNT expression at the apical domain of MDCK cells promoted net vectorial flux of zebularine. Neither hOCT1 nor hOCT2 transported decitabine, but both were involved in the efflux of zebularine, suggesting these proteins act as efflux transporters. hOCT1 polymorphic variants, known to alter function, decreased zebularine efflux. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the influence of human NTs and hOCTs on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of selected DNMT inhibitors. As hOCTs may also behave as efflux transporters, they could contribute either to chemoresistance or to chemosensitivity, depending upon the nature of the drug or combination of drugs being used in cancer therapy.

Concentrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hCNT1) promotes phenotypic changes relevant to tumor biology in a translocation-independent manner.

Nucleoside transporters (NTs) mediate the uptake of nucleosides and nucleobases across the plasma membrane, mostly for salvage purposes. The canonical NTs belong to two gene families, SLC29 and SLC28. The former encode equilibrative nucleoside transporter proteins (ENTs), which mediate the facilitative diffusion of natural nucleosides with broad selectivity, whereas the latter encode concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNTs), which are sodium-coupled and show high affinity for substrates with variable selectivity. These proteins are expressed in most cell types, exhibiting apparent functional redundancy. This might indicate that CNTs have specific roles in the physiology of the cell beyond nucleoside salvage. Here, we addressed this possibility using adenoviral vectors to restore tumor cell expression of hCNT1 or a polymorphic variant (hCNT1S546P) lacking nucleoside translocation ability. We found that hCNT1 restoration in pancreatic cancer cells significantly altered cell-cycle progression and phosphorylation status of key signal-transducing kinases, promoted poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase hyperactivation and cell death and reduced cell migration. Importantly, the translocation-defective transporter triggered these same effects on cell physiology. Moreover, this study also shows that restoration of hCNT1 expression is able to reduce tumor growth in a mouse model of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. These data predict a novel role for a NT protein, hCNT1, which appears to be independent of its role as mediator of nucleoside uptake by cells. Thereby, hCNT1 fits the profile of a transceptor in a substrate translocation-independent manner and is likely to be relevant to tumor biology.

Up-regulation of FXR isoforms is not required for stimulation of the expression of genes involved in the lack of response of colon cancer to chemotherapy.

Several mechanisms are involved in the poor response of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRAC) to pharmacological treatment. Since preliminary evidences have suggested that the enhanced expression of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) results in the stimulation of chemoresistance, we investigated whether FXR up-regulation is required for the expression of genes that characterize the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype of CRAC. Samples of tumours and adjacent healthy tissues were collected from naive patients. Using Taqman Low-Density Arrays, the abundance of mRNA of 87 genes involved in MDR was determined. Relevant changes were re-evaluated by conventional RT-QPCR. In healthy tissue the major FXR isoforms were FXRα2(+/-) (80%). In tumours this predominance persisted (91%) but was accompanied by a consistent reduction (3-fold) in total FXR mRNA. A lower FXR expression was confirmed by immunostaining, in spite of which there was a significant change in the expression of MDR genes. Pharmacological challenge was simulated "in vitro" using human CRAC cells (LS174T cells). Short-term (72h) treatment with cisplatin slightly increased the almost negligible expression of FXR in wild-type LS174T cells, whereas long-term (months) treatment induced a cisplatin-resistant phenotype (LS174T/R cells), which was accompanied by a 350-fold up-regulation of FXR, mainly FXRα1(+/-). However, the changed expression of MDR genes in LS174T/R cells was not markedly affected by incubation with the FXR antagonist Z-guggulsterone. In conclusion, although the enhanced expression of FXR may be involved in the stimulation of chemoresistance that occurs during pharmacological treatment, FXR up-regulation is not required for the presence of the MDR phenotype characteristic of CRAC.

No correlation between the expression of FXR and genes involved in multidrug resistance phenotype of primary liver tumors.

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) has been recently reported to enhance chemoresistance through bile acid-independent mechanisms. Thus, FXR transfection plus activation with GW4064 resulted in reduced sensitivity to cisplatin-induced toxicity. This is interesting because primary tumors of the liver, an organ where FXR is expressed, exhibit marked refractoriness to pharmacological treatment. Here we have determined whether FXR is upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CGC) and hepatoblastoma (HPB) and whether this is related with the expression of genes involved in mechanisms of chemoresistance. Using RT-QPCR and Taqman low density arrays we have analyzed biopsies from healthy livers or surgically removed tumors from naive patients and cell lines derived from HCC (SK-HEP-1, Alexander and Huh7), CGC (TFK1) and HPB (HepG2), before and after exposure to cisplatin at IC50 for 72 h. In liver tumors FXR expression was not enhanced but significantly decreased (healthy liver > HCC > HPB ≈ CGC). Except for CGC, this was not accompanied by changes in the proportions of FXR isoforms. Changes in 36 genes involved in drug uptake/efflux and metabolism, expression/function of molecular targets, and survival/apoptosis balance were found. Changes affecting SLC22A1, CYP2A1 and BIRC5 were shared by HCC, CGC and HPB. Similarity in gene expression profiles between cell lines and parent tumors was found. Pharmacological challenge with cisplatin induced changes that increased this resemblance. This was not dependent upon FXR expression. Thus, although FXR may play a role in inducing chemoresistance under certain circumstances, its upregulation does not seem to be involved in the multidrug resistance phenotype characteristic of HCC, CGC and HPB.

Role of nucleoside transporters in nucleoside-derived drug sensitivity.

Nucleoside-derived drugs are currently used clinically as anticancer drugs. To exert their pharmacological action first they need to enter into the cell across plasma membrane transporters and be metabolized. Thus, efficacy of treatment and acquisition of resistance can rely on a variety of events. In this article, we will focus in the role of nucleoside transporters in the sensitivity to nucleoside-derived drugs used in chemotherapy. Evidence of different transporter protein expression patterns in tumors compared to normal tissues, besides inter-individual variability in the levels of nucleoside transporters in tumors, suggest a major role of nucleoside transporters in the cytotoxicity of nucleoside analogs. In fact, different studies have linked nucleoside transporter function to drug sensitivity and clinical outcome in cancer patients. However, prospective clinical studies analysing nucleoside transporters and metabolic enzymes, as biomarkers of drug metabolism and action are required to better establish the role these proteins might play in cancer chemotherapy.

Adenosine mediates transforming growth factor-beta 1 release in kidney glomeruli of diabetic rats.

Up regulation of the transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta1) axis has been recognized as a pathogenic event for progression of glomerulosclerosis in diabetic nephropathy. We demonstrate that glomeruli isolated from diabetic rats accumulate up to sixfold more extracellular adenosine than normal rats. Both decreased nucleoside uptake activity by the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 and increased AMP hydrolysis contribute to raise extracellular adenosine. Ex vivo assays indicate that activation of the low affinity adenosine A2B receptor subtype (A2BAR) mediates TGF-beta1 release from glomeruli of diabetic rats, a pathogenic event that could support progression of glomerulopathy when the bioavailability of adenosine is increased.

Transport of nucleoside analogs across the plasma membrane: a clue to understanding drug-induced cytotoxicity.

Nucleoside analogs are widely used in the treatment of cancer and viral-induced diseases. Efficacy of treatments relies upon a variety of events, including transport across tissue and target barriers, which determine drug pharmacokinetics and target cell bioavailability. To exert their action, nucleosides have to be chemically modified, thus compromising cellular uptake by those routes which are responsible for the uptake of natural nucleosides and nucleobases. In this review we will focus on established knowledge and recent advances in the understanding of nucleoside- and nucleobase-derived drug uptake mechanisms. Basically, these drug uptake processes involve the gene families SLC22, SLC28 and SLC29. These gene families encode Organic Anion Transporter (OAT)/Organic Cation Transporter (OCT), Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter (CNT) and Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter (ENT) proteins, respectively. The pharmacological profiles of these plasma membrane carriers as well as their basic physiological and regulatory properties, including their tissue and subcellular distribution will be reviewed. This knowledge is crucial for the understanding of nucleoside- and nucleobase-derived drug bioavailability and therapeutic action. Moreover, changes in both transporter expression and/or transporter function (for instance as a consequence of gene variability) might also modulate response to treatment, thereby anticipating a putative diagnostic and predictive added value to the analysis of transporter expression and their corresponding genetic variants.

SLC28 genes and concentrative nucleoside transporter (CNT) proteins.

The human concentrative nucleoside transporter (hCNT) protein family has three members, hCNT1, 2, and 3, encoded by SLC28A1, A2, and A3 genes, respectively. hCNT1 and hCNT2 translocate pyrimidine- and purine-nucleosides, respectively, by a sodium-dependent mechanism, whereas hCNT3 shows broad substrate selectivity and the unique ability of translocating nucleosides both in a sodium- and a proton-coupled manner. hCNT proteins are also responsible for the uptake of most nucleoside-derived antiviral and anticancer drugs. Thus, hCNTs are key pharmacological targets. This review focuses on several crucial aspects of hCNT biology and pharmacology: protein structure-function, structural determinants for transportability, pharmacogenetics of hCNT-encoding genes, role of hCNT proteins in nucleoside-based therapeutics, and finally hCNT physiology.

Immunocytochemical detection of hENT1 and hCNT1 in normal tissues, lung cancer cell lines, and NSCLC patient samples.

Nucleoside transporters are essential for the cellular entry, efficacy, and cytotoxicity of several clinically important deoxynucleoside analogs (e.g., cytarabine and gemcitabine). We used immunohistochemistry to determine protein expression levels of the nucleoside transporters hENT1 and hCNT1 in NSCLC cell lines, NSCLC patient samples, and a variety of normal tissues. All 4 NSCLC cell lines expressed high to very high levels of both hENT1 and hCNT1. In NSCLC and normal tissues expression of hENT1 and hCNT1 ranged from completely negative to high. Immunohistochemistry might be a useful tool to predict response to deoxynucleoside analogs in malignancies treated with these drugs.

Concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNTs) in epithelia: from absorption to cell signaling.

Concentrative and Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter proteins (CNT and ENT, respectively) are encoded by gene families SLC28 and SLC29. They mediate the uptake of natural nucleosides and a variety of nucleoside-derived drugs, mostly used in anticancer therapy. CNT and ENT proteins are mostly localized in the apical and basolateral sides, respectively, in (re)absorptive epithelia. This anatomic distribution determines nucleoside and nucleoside-derived vectorial flux. CNT expression (particularly CNT2) is associated with differentiation and is also nutritionally regulated in intestinal epithelia, whereas ENT protein amounts (mostly ENT1) are increased when cells are exposed to proliferative stimuli such as EGF, TGF-alpha or wounding. Although all these features suggest a role for NT proteins in nucleoside salvage and (re)absorption, recent data demonstrate that CNT2 might be under purinergic control, in a manner that is dependent on energy metabolism. A physiological link between CNT2 function and intracellular metabolism is also supported by the evidence that extracellular adenosine can activate the AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK), by a mechanism which relies upon adenosine transport and phosphorylation. Thus the complex pattern of NT isoform expression in mammalian cells can fulfill physiological roles other than salvage.

Concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNTs) in epithelia: from absorption to cell signaling

No disponible

Concentrative and Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporter proteins (CNT andENT, respectively) are encoded by gene families SLC28 and SLC29. They mediatethe uptake of natural nucleosides and a variety of nucleoside-derived drugs, mostlyused in anticancer therapy. CNT and ENT proteins are mostly localized in the apicaland basolateral sides, respectively, in (re)absorptive epithelia. This anatomic distributiondetermines nucleoside and nucleoside-derived vectorial flux. CNT expression(particularly CNT2) is associated with differentiation and is also nutritionallyregulated in intestinal epithelia, whereas ENT protein amounts (mostly ENT1) areincreased when cells are exposed to proliferative stimuli such as EGF, TGF-á orwounding. Although all these features suggest a role for NT proteins in nucleosidesalvage and (re)absorption, recent data demonstrate that CNT2 might be underpurinergic control, in a manner that is dependent on energy metabolism. A physiologicallink between CNT2 function and intracellular metabolism is also supportedby the evidence that extracellular adenosine can activate the AMP-dependent kinase(AMPK), by a mechanism which relies upon adenosine transport and phosphorylation.Thus the complex pattern of NT isoform expression in mammalian cells can fulfillphysiological roles other than salvage

TGF-beta transcriptionally activates the gene encoding the high-affinity adenosine transporter CNT2 in rat liver parenchymal cells.

The nucleoside transporter CNT2 is the highest-affinity adenosine transporter identified so far. Recent evidence suggests that CNT2 has functions other than salvage (i.e. modulation of purinergic responses). Here we identified TGF-beta1 as a potent inducer of CNT2 protein expression in liver parenchymal cells. By contrast, CNT1, which is a target of multifunctional cytokines involved in liver cell proliferation, does not respond to TGF-beta1 treatment. Cloning of a murine CNT2 gene sequence with promoter-like activity enabled us to demonstrate that this cytokine exerts this effect by transcriptionally activating the CNT2-encoding gene in a JNK-dependent manner. The evidence that CNT2 is not a target of multifunctional cytokines involved in hepatocyte proliferation, but instead, of a cytokine that plays major roles in differentiation and apoptosis, further supports the view that the main physiological role of this transporter protein is not nucleoside salvage.

Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 2 is expressed in human umbilical vein endothelium, but is not involved in the inhibition of adenosine transport induced by hyperglycaemia.

Human equilibrative, Na(+)-independent nucleoside transport is mediated by membrane proteins sensitive (system es, hENT1) or insensitive (system ei, hENT2) to nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR). Gestational diabetes and elevated extracellular concentrations of D-glucose reduce adenosine transport in human umbilical vein endothelium (HUVEC). We studied hENT2 and hENT1 expression in HUVEC, and the effect of D-glucose on their activity and expression in HUVEC preincubated with 25 mM D-glucose (24 h). hENT2 and hENT1 mRNA were quantified by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and their proteins were detected by Western blotting. hENT2 and hENT1 proteins are co-expressed in HUVEC and are located at the plasma membrane, however, hENT2 was mainly cytoplasmatic and perinuclear in location. D-Glucose reduced hENT1 and hENT2 mRNA expression, but only hENT1 protein abundance at the plasma membrane. Adenosine transport was inhibited by D-glucose and NMBPR (1 microM) in intact cells and membrane vesicles. Hypoxanthine inhibited adenosine transport in the absence or in the presence of 1 microM NBMPR. D-Glucose reduced NBMPR maximal binding in intact cells, membrane vesicles, and plasma membrane fractions. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that hENT2 and hENT1 are co-expressed in HUVEC, and even when adenosine transport is also mediated by hENT2, the hENT2-mediated transport activity is not involved in the d-glucose-induced down-regulation of total adenosine transport.

The concentrative nucleoside transporter family (SLC28): new roles beyond salvage?

The concentrative nucleoside transporter (CNT) family (SLC28) has three members: SLC28A1 (CNT1), SLC28A2 (CNT2) and SLC28A3 (CNT3). The CNT1 and CNT2 transporters are co-expressed in liver parenchymal cells and macrophages, two suitable models in which to study cell cycle progression. Despite initial observations suggesting that these transporter proteins might contribute to nucleoside salvage during proliferation, their subcellular localization and regulatory properties suggest alternative roles in cell physiology. In particular, CNT2 is a suitable candidate for modulation of purinergic responses, since it is under the control of the adenosine 1 receptor. Increasing evidence also suggests a role for CNT2 in energy metabolism, since its activation relies on the opening of ATP-sensitive K(+) channels. Animal and cell models genetically modified to alter nucleoside transporter expression levels may help to elucidate the particular roles of CNT proteins in cell physiology.

Equilibrative nucleoside transporter-2 (hENT2) protein expression correlates with ex vivo sensitivity to fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells.

Fludarabine is considered the treatment of choice for most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We have analyzed the role of plasma membrane transporters in nucleoside-derived drug bioavailability and action in CLL cells. Among the known plasma membrane transporters, we have previously observed a significant correlation between fludarabine uptake via ENT carriers and ex vivo sensitivity of CLL cells to fludarabine, although mRNA amounts of the equilibrative nucleoside transporters hENT1 and hENT2 do not show any predictive response to treatment. In this study, using polyclonal monospecific antibodies we have observed a significant correlation between the expression of hENT2 by Western blot and fludarabine uptake via hENT carriers and also with ex vivo sensitivity of CLL cells to fludarabine. These results suggest that the equilibrative nucleoside transporter hENT2 plays a role in fludarabine responsiveness in CLL patients.

Nucleoside transporters in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Nucleoside derivatives have important therapeutic activity in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Experimental evidence indicates that in CLL cells most of these drugs induce apoptosis ex vivo, suggesting that programmed cell death is the mechanism of their therapeutic action, relying upon previous uptake and metabolic activation. Although defective apoptosis and poor metabolism often cause resistance to treatment, differential uptake and/or export of nucleosides and nucleotides may significantly modulate intracellular drug bioavailability and, consequently, responsiveness to therapy. Two gene families, SLC28 and SLC29, encode transporter proteins responsible for concentrative and equilibrative nucleoside uptake (CNT and ENT, respectively). Furthermore, selected members of the expanding ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein family have recently been identified as putative efflux pumps for the phosphorylated forms of these nucleoside-derived drugs, ABCC11 (MRP8) being a good candidate to modulate cell sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines. Sensitivity of CLL cells to fludarabine has also been recently correlated with ENT-type transport function, suggesting that, besides the integrity of apoptotic pathways and appropriate intracellular metabolism, transport across the plasma membrane is also a relevant event during CLL treatment. As long as nucleoside transporter expression in leukaemia cells is not constitutive, the possibility of regulating nucleoside transporter function by pharmacological means may also contribute to improve therapy.

Nucleoside transporters in absorptive epithelia.

There are two families of nucleoside transporters, concentrative (termed CNTs) and equilibrative (called ENTs). The members of both families mediate the transmembrane transport of natural nucleosides and some drugs whose structure is based on nucleosides. CNT transporters show a high affinity for their natural substrates (with Km values in the low micromolar range) and are substrate selective. In contrast, ENT transporters show lower affinity and are more permissive regarding the substrates they accept. Both types of transporters are tightly regulated in all cell types studied so far, both by endocrine and growth factors and by substrate availability. The degree of cell differentiation and the proliferation status of a cell also affect the pattern of expressed transporters. Although the presence of both types of transporters in the cells of absortive epithelia suggested the possibility of a transepithelial flux of nucleosides, their exact localization in the different plasma membrane domains of epithelial cells had not been demonstrated until recently. Concentrative transporters are found in the apical membrane while equlibrative transporters are located in the basolateral membrane, thus strengthening the hypothesis of a transepithelial flux of nucleosides.