Motives for joining an unrelated HSC donor registry: description, categorization, and association with donor availability.

A challenge for registries of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors is to recruit and retain sufficient donors for patients needing transplants. Many registered HSC donors opt-out when called as a potential match for a patient. Anecdotal evidence suggests that motives for joining a registry may be linked to the donation decision. The primary goals of this investigation were to describe the range of motives for joining a registry and to examine donor availability by motive type. A diverse sample of 357 potential HSC donors from the Anthony Nolan registry in the UK was asked about their motives for joining and their decision to continue or opt-out after matching a patient was recorded. Motives for joining (N = 557) were first coded and categorized into 17 specific motive types and then arranged along a spectrum from internal to external. Internal values-based motives were most prevalent and availability was highest among potential donors expressing these motives (92%) and lowest among those expressing external motives (pressure, incentives; 0%). Although further research is needed to confirm these findings, they suggest that registries should assess donors' motives for joining at recruitment in order to conduct follow-up to ensure commitment among those potential members expressing external motives.

Providing Level-of-Match Information to Perfectly Matched Unrelated Stem Cell Donors: Evaluating Acceptability and Potential Changes in Donor Availability.

Patients with blood-related diseases often cannot identify a matched related donor and must seek donors in unrelated donor registries. These registries face the challenge of ensuring that potential donors are available when contacted. Donor attrition is especially problematic when there is only a single perfectly matched potential donor. One way to improve donor availability might be to present perfectly matched donors (high-priority donors [HPDs]) with more precise information about their match status. This project evaluated the impact of providing such information to HPDs at the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be The Match. Objectives were to determine the acceptability of the new messaging to both HPDs and the donor contact representatives (DCRs) who delivered the message, consistency of message delivery, and whether the new messaging was associated with improved donor availability. Mixed methods were used to collect telephone interview data from HPDs, matched samples of non-HPDs, and DCRs. Donor availability data came from NMDP records. Key findings were as follows: (1) the HPD message was acceptable to potential donors and did not seem to produce undue pressure, (2) the message was acceptable to DCRs who became more comfortable and consistent in delivering the message over time, but (3) the new messaging did not significantly increase availability. Despite the lack of evidence for increased availability, there may be ethical benefits and little harm to providing well-matched donors with more information about their degree of matching. Research should examine stronger match status messages and delivery of new messaging to additional highly-matched donor groups.