Capecitabine bioequivalence in healthy volunteers.

Capecitabine is a prodrug and is selectively activated by tumor cells to its cytotoxic moiety, 5-fluorouracil, by thymidine phosphorylase, which is generally expressed at high levels in tumors. Clinical and pharmacokinetic studies of capecitabine have been performed in patients with cancer. This study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of two capecitabine formulations (150-mg tablet) using healthy male subjects under nonfasting conditions. The study was conducted as an open, randomized, three-period, semi-replicated design with three sequences (RRT, RTR, TRR) with a 1-week washout interval. The subjects were selected for the study after having their health status previously assessed by a clinical evaluation and laboratory tests (biochemical and hematological parameters, and urinalysis). A single capecitabine tablet (150 mg) was given in each occasion. Plasma capecitabine concentrations were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) with positive ion electrospray ionization using multiple reactions monitoring (MRM). The geometric mean and 90% confidence intervals (CI) of capecitabine/Xeloda® (T/R) percent ratio were 104.34% (98.74 - 110.25%) for AUClast, 103.06% (97.48 - 108.96%) for AUCinf, and 104.07% (88.13 - 122.90%) for Cmax. Since the 90% CI for Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf ratios were all inside the 80 - 125% interval proposed by the US Food and Drug Administration Agency, it was concluded that the capecitabine formulation elaborated by Eurofarma Laboratórios Ltda. is bioequivalent to Xeloda® formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption. The drug was well tolerated by the subjects, indicating that it is safe to perform capecitabine bioequivalence studies in healthy male subjects.
.

Bioequivalência de cloridrato de propafenona 300mg em comprimido revestido em administração pós-prandial em adultos saudáveis / Bioequivalence of propafenone hydrochloride 300mg film coated tablets in healthy adults

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a bioequivalência de duas formulações de cloridrato de propafenona 300mg em comprimido revestido.MÉTODOS: Estudo randomizado, cruzado, aberto, com dois tratamentos, duas sequências e quatro períodos com 60 participantes sadios de ambos os sexos. Os voluntários foram internados em quatro oportunidades durante 24 horas; em cada período, os sujeitos receberam a formulação teste ou a formulação referência, em regime pós-prandial. Foram coletadas 23 amostras de sangue após administração da droga para determinação plasmática da propafenona. Para quantificação da droga, foi utilizada técnica de cromatografia líquida acoplada à espectrometria de massas sequencial. RESULTADOS: As formulações foram consideradas clinicamente bem toleradas. A concentração máxima e a área sob a curva de zero a 36 horas foram comparadas: a média geométrica da razão entre as formulações teste e referência para concentração máxima foi de 110,16%, com intervalo de confiança de 99,44% a 122,04% e coeficiente de variação de 33,95%. A média geométrica da razão entre as formulações teste e referência para a área sob a curva de zero a 36 horas foi de 107,92%, com intervalo de confiança de 99,58% a 116,96% e coeficiente de variação de 26,39%. A média geométrica da razão entre o medicamento teste e referência para área sob a curva de zero ao infinito foi de 107,12%, com intervalo de confiança de de 99,11% a 115,78% e coeficiente de variação de 25,48%. CONCLUSÃO: As formulações teste e referência foram estatisticamente bioequivalentes, de acordo com sua taxa e extensão de absorção.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence of two 300mg profanone hydrochloride coated tablets. METHODS: Randomized, cross-over, openstudy, with two treatments, two sequences, and four periods with 60 healthy participants of both genders. The volunteers were admitted in four opportunities over 24 hours; on each period, the subjects received a test formulation, or a reference formulation, in a postprandial administration. Twenty-three samples of blood were collected after oral administration of the drug for determining plasma level of propafenone. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was used for quantifying propafenone. RESULTS: The formulations were considered clinically well tolerated. The maximum concentration and the area under the curve from zero to 36 hours were compared: the geometric mean of the ratio between the test and reference formulations for maximum concentration was 110.16%, with confidence interval of 99.44% - 122.04%), coefficient of variation of 33.95%. The geometric mean of the ratio between the test and reference formulations for the area under the curve of zero to 36 hours was 107.92%, with confidence interval of 99.58% - 116.96%, and coefficient of variation of 26.39%. The geometric mean of the ratio between the formulations for area under the curve of zero to infinitum as 107.12% with confidence interval of 99.11% - 115.78%),and coefficient of variation of 25.48%. CONCLUSION: According to the rate and extension of absorption, the test and reference formulations are statistically bioequivalent.

An improved LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of indapamide in whole blood: application for a bioequivalence study.

An improved LC-MS/MS method for the quantitation of indapamide in human whole blood was developed and validated. Indapamide-d3 was used as internal standard (IS) and liquid-liquid extraction was employed for sample preparation. LC separation was performed on Synergi Polar RP-column (50 × 4.6 mm i.d.; 4 µm) and mobile phase composed of methanol and 5 mm aqueous ammonium acetate containing 1 mm formic acid (60:40), at flow rate of 1 mL/min. The run time was 3.0 min and the injection volume was 20 µL. Mass spectrometric detection was performed using electrospray ion source in negative ionization mode, using the transitions m/z 364.0 → m/z 188.9 and m/z 367.0 → m/z 188.9 for indapamide and IS, respectively. Calibration curve was constructed over the range 0.25-50 ng/mL. The method was precise and accurate, and provided recovery rates >80% for indapamide and IS. The method was applied to determine blood concentrations of indapamide in a bioequivalence study with two sustained release tablet formulations. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratios for maximum concentration was 95.78% and for the area under the concentration-time curve it was 97.91%. The tested indapamide tablets (Eurofarma Laboratórios S.A.) were bioequivalent to Natrilix®, according to the rate and extent of absorption.

Recommendations and best practices for reference standards and reagents used in bioanalytical method validation.

The continued globalization of pharmaceutics has increased the demand for companies to know and understand the regulations that exist across the globe. One hurdle facing pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies developing new drug candidates is interpreting the current regulatory guidance documents and industry publications associated with bioanalytical method validation (BMV) from each of the different agencies throughout the world. The objective of this commentary is to provide our opinions on the best practices for reference standards and key reagents, such as metabolites and internal standards used in the support of regulated bioanalysis based on a review of current regulatory guidance documents and industry white papers for BMV.