Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acad Emerg Med ; 22(9): 1025-33, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26284824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine which factors contribute to frequent visits at the emergency department (ED) and what proportion were inappropriate in comparison with nonfrequent visits. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, case-control study comparing a random sample of frequent attenders and nonfrequent attenders, with details of their ED visits recorded over a 12-month duration. Frequent attenders were defined as patients with four or more visits during the study period. RESULTS: In comparison with nonfrequent attenders (median age = 45.0 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 28.0 to 61.0 years), frequent attenders were older (median = 57.5 years, IQR = 34.0 to 74.8 years; p = 0.0003). They were also found to have more comorbidities, where 53.3% of frequent attenders had three or more chronic illnesses compared to 14% of nonfrequent attenders (p < 0.0001), and were often triaged to higher priority (more severe) classes (frequent 52.2% vs. nonfrequent 37.6%, p = 0.0004). Social issues such as bad debts (12.7%), heavy drinking (3.3%), and substance abuse (2.7%) were very low in frequent attenders compared to Western studies. Frequent attenders had a similar rate of appropriate visits to the ED as nonfrequent attenders (55.2% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.0892), but were more often triaged to P1 priority triage class (6.7% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.0014) and were more often admitted for further management compared to nonfrequent attenders (47.5% vs. 29.6%, p < 0.001). The majority of frequent attender visits were appropriate (55.2%), and of these, 81.1% resulted in admission. For the same number of patients, total visits made by frequent attenders ($174,247.60) cost four times as much as for nonfrequent attenders ($40,912.40). This represents a significant economic burden on the health care system. CONCLUSIONS: ED frequent attenders in Singapore were associated with higher age and presence of multiple comorbidities rather than with social causes of ED use. Even in integrated health systems, repeat ED visits are frequent and expensive, despite minimal social causes of acute care. EDs in aging populations must anticipate the influx of vulnerable, elderly patients and have in place interventional programs to care for them.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Female , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Singapore/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Triage
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 32(8): 895-9, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24919775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Asthma has been reported as one of the main causes of frequent attendance to the emergency department (ED), and many of those visits are potentially preventable. Understanding the characteristics of frequent attender (FA) patients with asthmatic exacerbations will help to identify factors associated with frequent attendance and improve case management. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics of FA who present multiple times to the ED for asthma exacerbations. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of cases presented to Singapore General Hospital ED in 2010. Patients who attended the ED for 4 times or more with at least 1 visit attributable to asthma exacerbations in 2010 were included. They were then categorized as FA with multiple exacerbations (FAME) and those with fewer exacerbations. RESULTS: Of 105616 ED patients, 155 patients attending the ED in 2010 were identified as FA with asthma, and 26 (17%) of these patients were classified as FAME, resulting in 213 visits (45% of total visits). Compared with FA with fewer exacerbations group, FAME were more likely to be men (P = .002), unemployed (P < .000), bad debtors (P = .045), substance abusers (P = .022), previously known to medical social workers (P = .002), and were found to spend a longer amount of time in the ED (>6 hours) (P = .03). CONCLUSION: We found that a small number of FAME patients accumulated a large number of ED visits and spent a significantly longer time in the ED. This group tended to be males with social, financial, and addiction problems.


Subject(s)
Asthma/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Asthma/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Singapore/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...