ABSTRACT
Background: The primary objective of this review is to estimate the rotational correction after corrective derotation osteotomies (CDO) for congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS). The secondary objective of this review is to identify the complications with CDO in CRUS. Methods: We included studies in the English literature from electronic bibliographic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, Directory of Open access journals (DOAJ), EMBASE, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus up to December 2020 that determined the effects of CDO in CRUS for two or more cases with a mean follow-up of 1 year or more. We used the National Institutes of health quality assessment tool for case series (interventional) and Modified Coleman methodology Score for assessment of risk of bias in the included studies. Results: We pooled 383 forearms (318 participants) from 23 studies with mean age of 6.28 ± 1.75 years. The mean pronation deformity was 72.83 ± 15.64° from 22 studies. The CDO derotated forearm to 10.4 ± 5.90° of mean pronation in 12 studies and 13.47 ± 9.51° of mean supination in nine studies. One study corrected the forearms to a neutral position. The mean derotation from CDO was 73.13 ± 16.54° (35° supination to 130° pronation). The overall mean difference was - 68.26° [95% CI - 86.87, - 49.66] of correction favoring supination. There were eight transient nerve palsies and six compartment syndromes from synostosis site osteotomies (four studies). Discussion: We had poor-quality studies at a high risk of bias on the described tools of assessment. We could estimate the directional effect of CDO in CRUS favoring correction from pronation to supination; however, due to the heterogeneity among studies, we cannot comment on the most efficient and least harmful CDO techniques. The single bone osteotomies seem to be efficient, simple, and reportedly low on complications but need evaluation. We cannot define the indications for correction and expected improvement in functional outcomes from osteotomy techniques. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00582-4.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Despite several reports on risk factors for septic arthritis (SA) in adults, the outcomes on quality of life and joint function are sparsely reported. This study aimed to investigate the quality of life and joint function in adult patients treated for SA. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled clinically diagnosed adult SA patients and estimated Euroqol 5-dimension 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, Euroqol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) and a validated tool for joint function at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after debridement. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients (20 males/7 females) with 21 knees, four shoulders, and two elbows were evaluated. The mean age of the cases was 51(± 13.00) years. Three cases sustained mortality. EQ-5D-5L (P < 0.01) and EQ-VAS (P < 0.01) scores improved significantly between all time frames. Mean Knee society (P < 0.01), Shoulder QuickDASH, and Mayo elbow scores improved at all time frames. There was no difference in primary outcomes between early (< 14 days) and late (14 days or more) presentation. There was no difference in primary outcome measures between confirmed and suspected SA. Fifteen patients could ambulate without support, while 6 needed some support for walking at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Improved outcomes can be expected in quality of life and joint function in adults' septic arthritis at the end of 1 year after surgical treatment; however, the effects of delay in presentation need to be investigated further. Isolation of the microorganism from an infected joint has no bearing on the outcome measures.
