Massage for mechanical neck disorders.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of mechanical neck disorders (MND) is known to be both a hindrance to individuals and costly to society. As such, massage is widely used as a form of treatment for MND. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of massage on pain, function, patient satisfaction, global perceived effect, adverse effects and cost of care in adults with neck pain versus any comparison at immediate post-treatment to long-term follow-up. SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, MANTIS, CINAHL, and ICL databases from date of inception to 4 Feburary 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies using random assignment were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted citation identification, study selection, data abstraction and methodological quality assessment. Using a random-effects model, we calculated the risk ratio and standardised mean difference. MAIN RESULTS: Fifteen trials met the inclusion criteria. The overall methodology of all the trials assessed was either low or very low GRADE level. None of the trials were of strong to moderate GRADE level. The results showed very low level evidence that certain massage techniques (traditional Chinese massage, classical and modified strain/counter strain technique) may have been more effective than control or placebo treatment in improving function and tenderness. There was very low level evidence that massage may have been more beneficial than education in the short term for pain bothersomeness. Along with that, there was low level evidence that ischaemic compression and passive stretch may have been more effective in combination rather than individually for pain reduction. The clinical applicability assessment showed that only 4/15 trials adequately described the massage technique. The majority of the trials assessed outcomes at immediate post-treatment, which is not an adequate time to assess clinical change. Due to the limitations in the quality of existing studies, we were unable to make any firm statement to guide clinical practice. We noted that only four of the 15 studies reported side effects. All four studies reported post-treatment pain as a side effect and one study (Irnich 2001) showed that 22% of the participants experienced low blood pressure following treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No recommendations for practice can be made at this time because the effectiveness of massage for neck pain remains uncertain.As a stand-alone treatment, massage for MND was found to provide an immediate or short-term effectiveness or both in pain and tenderness. Additionally, future research is needed in order to assess the long-term effects of treatment and treatments provided on more than one occasion.

CD44v6 expression in primary breast carcinoma in western India: a pilot clinicopathologic study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In India, breast cancer is becoming the number one cancer in females. CD44 is believed to play a critical role in the metastatic process, and its spliced forms, especially CD44v6, bestow a metastatic phenotype onto non-metastatic cells. However, the biological significance of CD44v6 in tumor progression remains controversial. Hence, pursuing our interest based on previous observations of a significant association of CD44 standard with advanced stage and poor survival, the present study investigated CD44v6 expression in our series of breast cancer. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: For this purpose, 85 untreated primary breast cancer patients were enrolled. CD44v6 was localized immunohistochemically, and its mRNA transcript along with CD44v9 and CD44v10 mRNA were studied by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Membranous and/or cytoplasmic staining of CD44v6 was observed in 48% of the primary breast cancers. CD44v6 protein expression showed no significant association with clinical risk factors and survival. At the RNA level, the expression of CD44v6, CD44v9 and CD44v10 in breast cancers was 44%, 22% and 36%, respectively. CD44v6 mRNA expression significantly correlated with CD44v9 (P = 0.013) and CD44v10 (P = 0.0001) but showed no correlation with its protein expression. Furthermore, except for CD44v6 mRNA, none of the other isoforms were associated with clinical risk factors or survival. Loss of CD44v6 mRNA was significantly associated with poor overall survival (P = 0.018). In multivariate overall survival analysis, loss of CD44v6 mRNA expression was a significant independent factor of a poor prognosis (P = 0.045) with a relative risk of 2.10, entering the equation at step three after stage and lymph node status. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results suggest an important role of CD44v6 in our series of patients. Down-expression of CD44v6 may be associated with the tumor cell phenotype, facilitating aggressive growth properties that affect the prognosis.