COVID-19 Diagnosis in Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain Without Respiratory Symptoms: A UK Emergency General Surgical Unit Experience.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has emerged reporting atypical clinical symptoms of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). There is a sparsity of existing studies examining COVID-19-related abdominal pain and the role of investigative imaging for the virus in these patients. Study aims were to determine COVID-19 incidence in those with acute abdominal pain in the absence of respiratory symptoms and to assess the diagnostic performance of CT thoracic imaging in such patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients admitted to our emergency general surgical unit between 1st March 2020 and 31st May 2020 was performed. In adherence with national guidelines, all patients underwent nasal and oro-pharyngeal COVID-19 RT-PCR swabs as well as thoracic and abdominal computed tomography (CT) on admission. RESULTS: From 112 patients admitted with acute abdominal pain in the absence of respiratory symptoms, 16 (14.3%) tested positive for COVID-19 on RT-PCR swab testing. Overall, 50% (8/16) of these patients had no intra-abdominal pathology on CT. The sensitivity and specificity of CT thoracic imaging for diagnosing COVID-19 was 43.8% and 91.7%, respectively. Patients with positive COVID-19 swabs had higher C-reactive protein levels, lower potassium levels and a higher proportion of those with a low lymphocyte count. DISCUSSION: One in seven patients with abdominal pain without any respiratory symptoms tested positive for COVID-19. Half of these patients represented COVID-19 manifesting primarily as acute abdominal pain. Combined swab testing and CT imaging should be performed in all abdominal pain presentations due to the varying diagnostic performance of thoracic CT in diagnosing COVID-19.

Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Limited robust evidence exists comparing outcomes following completely minimally invasive oesophagectomy (CMIO) to hybrid oesophagectomy (HO) in the treatment of resectable oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional (GOJ) cancer. This multi-centre study aims to assess postoperative morbidity between HO and CMIO according to the full Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) complication platform. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing an Ivor-Lewis HO or Ivor-Lewis CMIO for cancer between 2016 and 2018 in three UK tertiary centres were included. The primary study outcome was 30-day overall complications, evaluated by the ECCG complication subgroups. Secondary outcomes included survival outcomes and perioperative parameters between the two approaches. RESULTS: Of the 382 patients included, 228 (59.7%) patients had HOs and 154 (40.3%) patients had CMIOs with no inter-group baseline differences. Patients undergoing CMIO experienced less 30-day postoperative complications compared to those under undergoing HO (43.5% vs 57.0%, p = 0.010). ECCG defined pulmonary and infective complications were less frequent in the CMIO group. Anastomotic leak rates and oncological outcomes were similar between the two groups. Independent predictors of 30-day postoperative complications include surgical approach with HO and high ASA grade on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ivor-Lewis CMIO demonstrates superior short-term surgical outcomes when compared to Ivor-Lewis HO with no compromise in oncological feasibility. Anastomotic leak rates were equivalent between both groups. A robust randomised controlled trial is required to validate the findings of this study.

Management of anastomotic leaks after elective colorectal resections: The East of England experience. A retrospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal anastomotic leaks (AL) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management of AL and its intra-operative decision making is often difficult. The aim of this multi-centre study is to explore different management strategies, including different surgical options, and analyse rates and patterns of failure of initial management. METHODS: All consecutive patients who had a confirmed AL after elective colorectal resections from 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2019 were included at seven hospitals across the East of England Region. Morbidity (length of stay, and failures) and mortality were compared across the different management strategies, and survival analyses were performed (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05000580). RESULTS: Across all seven hospitals, a total of 3391 elective resection were done during the study period. 201 (5.9%) consecutive patients with confirmed AL were included. The initial treatment was conservative in 102(50.7%). 19 patients (9.5%) had a radiological procedure, 80 (39.8%) of patients required surgery as an initial treatment post AL. Of those who initially did not have a surgical intervention (n = 121), 10% (n = 12/121) eventually required laparotomy, 2 additional patients required transanal drainage. Ultimately 45.8% (n = 92/201) of the whole population eventually required a laparotomy. Patients managed conservatively had a shorter LOS when compared to either radiological drainage or surgical patients. Patients with a defunctioning stoma are more likely to have a successful conservative management and shorter LOS. 90-day mortality across the entire population was 8.1%. There were no significant differences in mortality or long-terms survival between the different initial treatment modalities or whether the leak was right or left sided. CONCLUSION: Despite initial conservative, antibiotic and radiological intervention being successful in the majority of patients, two out of five patients will still require a laparotomy and over a quarter of patients will have an end stoma.

Need For Whole Large Bowel Investigation in Sole Change in Bowel Habit: An Analysis of 719 Patients.

Purpose/Aim of the study: Patients referred for suspected colorectal cancer typically undergo whole large bowel investigation (WLBI) as per national guidelines. Sole change in bowel habit (CIBH) with no anemia/abdominal mass at time of referral has low oncological yield following diagnostic investigations, particularly for tumors proximal to the splenic flexure. Study aims were to evaluate cancer yield of patients referred for suspected colorectal cancer presenting with sole-symptom CIBH and to assess clinical and financial feasibility of a straight-to-test flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS). Materials and methods: We analyzed all 2-week wait referrals with sole CIBH between January 2013 and 2015. Information collected included cancer yield and oncological management. Results: Overall 1831 patient referrals were made during our study time. 719 (39.3%; median age 72 years, interquartile range: 65-79.5) were identified with sole CIBH at referral and underwent subsequent WLBI. 597 (83%) patients reported predominant looser/increased frequency stool (PLS) whilst the remaining 122 (17%) had predominant hard/decreased frequency stool (PHS). Overall, 18 were diagnosed with colorectal cancer (2.5%) with a further 9 patients (1.3%) harboring non-colorectal malignancies. The PHS group yielded a significantly higher proportion of colorectal cancers than the PLS group (adjusted OR 3.24, 95% CI: 1.23-8.54; p = .02). Colonic tumors proximal to the splenic flexure are uncommon in patients with sole CIBH (0.69%). In those with PLS, one proximal malignancy (0.17%) was detected with WLBI. Conclusions: Sole CIBH without anemia/abdominal mass yields a 2.5% colorectal malignancy rate from 2-week wait referrals. Those with PLS had a 0.17% yield of proximal tumors. A straight-to-test FS in this low risk group would be clinically effective with potential annual savings of more than £50 000.

Three-Dimensional vs Two-Dimensional Completely Minimally Invasive 2-Stage Esophagectomy With Intrathoracic Hand-Sewn Anastomosis for Esophageal Cancer: Comparison of Intra-and Postoperative Outcomes.

Background. Completely minimally invasive esophagectomy (CMIE) has been associated with reduced morbidity compared to open esophagectomy in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Three-dimensional (3D) vision can enhance depth perception during minimally invasive surgery when compared to two-dimensional (2D) vision. We aimed to compare outcomes from 2-stage CMIEs when performed in 2D vs 3D. Method. All consecutive 2-stage CMIEs performed for esophageal or gastroesophageal junctional cancer at a single-centre between 2016 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. All operations were completed in either 2D or 3D. All esophagogastric anastomoses were hand-sewn thoracoscopically. Intraoperative and postoperative clinical parameters were compared between 2D and 3D CMIE. Results. Overall, 98 patients underwent a 2-stage CMIE, of which 59 (60.2%) were in 2D and 39 (39.8%) in 3D. Median operative blood loss was less in the 3D group compared to the 2D group (283 mls vs 409 mls, P = .016). A higher number of lymph nodes were retrieved from 3D CMIE (30 vs 25, P = .010). The median duration of surgery was 407 minutes (interquartile ranges (IQR): 358-472 minutes) and 426 minutes (IQR: 369-509 minutes) when performed in 2D and 3D, respectively (P = .162). There were no significant intergroup differences in 30-day postoperative complications, short-term mortality, and hospital stay. Conclusion. We report reduced blood loss and higher lymph node yield when performing 3D CMIE than 2D CMIE. Other intraoperative and postoperative clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. A randomized controlled trial is needed to validate these findings of superior outcomes from CMIE performed in 3D over 2D.

Completely Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Hybrid Esophagectomy for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junctional Cancer: Clinical and Short-Term Oncological Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery for resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) cancer significantly reduces morbidity when compared with open surgery, as is evident from published landmark trials. Comparison of outcomes between hybrid esophagectomy (HE) and completely minimally invasive esophagectomy (CMIE) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to ascertain whether CMIE is associated with less postoperative complications compared with HE without oncological compromise. METHODS: All consecutive two-stage HEs and CMIEs performed between 2016 and 2018 were included. All procedures were performed with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Primary clinical outcomes were pulmonary infective and overall complications within 30 days of surgery, while primary oncological outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at both 6 months and to date. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative variables and postoperative clinical parameters. RESULTS: Overall, 98 patients had CMIEs and 49 patients had HEs. There were no baseline differences between the two groups. Thirty-day postoperative pulmonary infection rates were lower in the CMIE group compared with the HE group (12.2% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.014), and 30-day overall postoperative complication rates were also lower following CMIE (35.7% vs. 59.2%; p = 0.007). OS and DFS were similar between the two groups at 6 months (p = 0.201 and p = 0.109, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CMIE is associated with less pulmonary infective and overall postoperative complications compared with HE for resectable esophageal and GEJ cancer. No intergroup difference was observed regarding short-term survival and cancer recurrence in patients undergoing CMIE and HE. A randomized controlled trial comparing the two operative approaches is required to validate these findings.

Long-term BAROS scores and independent obesity-related co-morbidity predictors of failure after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Long-term (>5 yr) studies assessing outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) are limited. Evidence of predictors of failure long-term after LRYGB is also lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare BAROS scores at 5 and 10 years post LRYGB and to establish whether individual obesity-related co-morbidities are associated with suboptimal outcomes at these time points. SETTING: Single bariatric unit. METHODS: BAROS scores were analyzed in patients who were 5 years (group A) and 10 years (group B) post LRYGB. Obesity-related co-morbidities as predictors of failure of surgery (defined by % excess weight loss [%EWL] <50% or BAROS total score ≤1) were examined. Intergroup comparative analysis of outcomes and logistic regression modeling to determine predictors of weight loss failure were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were 5 years post LRYGB (group A), and 91 patients were 10 years post LRYGB (group B). A total of 52.3% (46/88) in group A and 54.9% (50/91) in group B had failure of weight loss defined by %EWL <50%. There were no significant differences in percentage of total weight loss, %EWL, or BAROS scores between the 2 groups (21.8% versus 22.0%, P = .897; 48.5% versus 47.1%, P = .993; and 3.7 versus 3.3, P = .332, respectively). No individual obesity-related co-morbidity at time of surgery was associated with suboptimal outcomes (%EWL <50% or BAROS total score ≤1) at 5 years or 10 years after LRYGB. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes assessed by the BAROS score appear sustainable between 5 and 10 years after LRYGB surgery, and weight loss achieved at 5 years is maintained at 10 years. Preoperative presence of specific obesity-related co-morbidities was not associated with failure of surgery long-term.

Long-Term Outcomes and Quality of Life at More than 10 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Using Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS).

INTRODUCTION: Literature on long-term (> 10 years) outcomes in terms of weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, and quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the excess weight loss (EWL), resolution of comorbidities, and QoL more than 10 years after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). METHODS: Data on patient demographics, weight, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, type of surgery, complications, and QoL were collected from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients out of 104 who underwent LRYGB during the study period and completed a median follow-up of 130 months were successfully contacted. The median age was 48 years (IQR 42-54 years) and 85.9% had a BMI of more than 40. The median excess weight loss (EWL) was 46.5% (IQR 27.9-64.3%). Type 2 diabetes mellitus reduced from 56.5 to 23.9% (p < 0.001), hypertension from 51.1 to 39.1% (p = 0.016), and obstructive sleep apnoea from 33.7 to 12.0% (p < 0.001). Participants reported feeling better (median 0.2, IQR 0.2-0.4), engaging in more physical activity (0.1, IQR 0.1-0.3), having more satisfactory social contacts (0.4, IQR 0.2-0.5), a better ability to work (0.3, IQR - 0.1-0.5), and a healthier approach to food (0.2, IQR - 0.3-0.3) at the end of follow-up. CONCLUSION: LRYGB leads to positive outcomes in terms of weight loss, reduction in comorbidities, and improvement in QoL at a follow-up of more than 10 years.

A Comparison of Emergency First Presentations of Colorectal Cancer in Under-50 and Over-50 Year-Old Patients.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second commonest malignancy related death in Western Europe with incidence increasing in young adults. 31% of UK patients with CRC present as emergencies. We compare the incidence, characteristics, management and outcomes in two cohorts presenting as CRC emergencies; under-50 and over-50 years old. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on 322 patients with emergency presentations of CRC over a 9-year period (January 2005-December 2013, West Suffolk Hospital, UK). Data were analyzed for demographics, symptoms, investigations, stage, grade, genetics, tumor location, management, and mortality. Results: 300 patients over 50 years old presented with CRC emergencies; 153 women (51%):147 men (49%); median age 77 years (interquartile range: 67-84). 22 patients under 50-years-old; 12 women (55%):10 men (45%); median age 43 years ([Interquartile Range (IQR)]: 35-46 years). Bowel obstruction was less common in under-50s (18.2% vs. 40.7%; p = 0.04). No over-50s had a positive family history for CRC; 7 under-50s did. A higher proportion of under-50s presented with Dukes A carcinomas (14.3% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.002), but no difference in other Dukes stages. Surgery was performed in a higher proportion of under-50s (95.5% vs. 77.0%; p = 0.04) and a higher proportion had same day surgery (71.4% vs. 28.1%; p = 0.01). Overall mortality was lower in under-50s (36.4% vs. 64.0%; p = 0.02). No significant differences occurred in in-hospital mortality (4.7% vs. 8.0%; p = 0.55), overall one-year survival (31.8% vs. 41.7%; p = 0.36), or median survival to death or study conclusion (27.1 vs. 19.6 months; p = 0.13). Conclusion: Emergency CRC had comparable outcomes between young and old cohorts, during the study time period. Younger patients were more likely to undergo operative interventions but overall survival was comparable.Our study was limited by the reporting biases intrinsic to retrospective analyses and by a small under-50 sample size. Further large-scale studies are warranted to support observations.

Five year experience of gallbladder polyp surveillance and cost effective analysis against new European consensus guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder polyp (GBP) surveillance seeks to identify early neoplasms, but practice varies amongst surgical units. Recent European consensus guidelines have recommended an evidence-based GBP surveillance strategy. In a tertiary centre Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary unit we examine GBP surveillance, malignant yield, and assess cost-effectiveness of the new European consensus guidelines. METHODS: Respective data were collected from all patients with ultrasonography-detected GBPs between January 2008 and January 2013. RESULTS: 558 patients had GBPs detected on ultrasonography. Following initial ultrasonography, 304 (54.5%) had further ultrasonography surveillance of which 168 were in a formal GBP surveillance programme. Pre-malignant/malignant pathology yield was 1.97% with an annual detection rate of 12.0 cases per 1000 GBPs surveyed. Cost-effectiveness analysis of European consensus guidelines calculated annual savings of £209 163 per 1000 GBPs surveyed. Compliance with these guidelines would result in an additional 12.5% of patients under surveillance requiring cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: GBP surveillance uptake was suboptimal at 32.8%. The incidence of pre-malignant/malignant lesions in GBPs emphasises the importance of surveillance for early detection and management with a view to avoiding the poor outcomes associated with more advanced gallbladder cancer. Adherence to the new European consensus guidelines would be clinically cost-effective with significant potential savings demonstrated in this study.

Incidental non-benign gallbladder histopathology after cholecystectomy in an United Kingdom population: Need for routine histological analysis?

AIM: To analyse the range of histopathology detected in the largest published United Kingdom series of cholecystectomy specimens and to evaluate the rational for selective histopathological analysis. METHODS: Incidental gallbladder malignancy is rare in the United Kingdom with recent literature supporting selective histological assessment of gallbladders after routine cholecystectomy. All cholecystectomy gallbladder specimens examined by the histopathology department at our hospital during a five year period between March 2008 and March 2013 were retrospectively analysed. Further data was collected on all specimens demonstrating carcinoma, dysplasia and polypoid growths. RESULTS: The study included 4027 patients. The majority (97%) of specimens exhibited gallstone or cholecystitis related disease. Polyps were demonstrated in 44 (1.09%), the majority of which were cholesterol based (41/44). Dysplasia, ranging from low to multifocal high-grade was demonstrated in 55 (1.37%). Incidental primary gallbladder adenocarcinoma was detected in 6 specimens (0.15%, 5 female and 1 male), and a single gallbladder revealed carcinoma in situ (0.02%). This large single centre study demonstrated a full range of gallbladder disease from cholecystectomy specimens, including more than 1% neoplastic histology and two cases of macroscopically occult gallbladder malignancies. CONCLUSION: Routine histological evaluation of all elective and emergency cholecystectomies is justified in a United Kingdom population as selective analysis has potential to miss potentially curable life threatening pathology.

Scoring System to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A UK Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a preoperative predictive score of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Other risk factors for POPF were sought in an attempt to improve the score. BACKGROUND: POPF is the major contributor to morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). A preoperative score [using body mass index (BMI) and pancreatic duct width] to predict POPF was tested upon a multicenter patient cohort to assess its performance. METHODS: Patients undergoing PD at 8 UK centers were identified. The association between the score and other pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables with POPF was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 630 patients underwent PD with 141 occurrences of POPF (22.4%). BMI, perirenal fat thickness, pancreatic duct width on computed tomography and at operation, bilirubin, pancreatojejunostomy technique, underlying pathology, T stage, N stage, R status, and gland firmness were all significantly associated with POPF. The score predicted POPF (P < 0.001) with a higher predictive score associated with increasing severity of POPF (P < 0.001). Stepwise multivariate analysis of pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables demonstrated that only the score was consistently associated with POPF. A table correlating the risk score to actual risk of POPF was created. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive score performed well and could not be improved. This provides opportunities for individualizing patient consent and selection, and treatment and research applications.