ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study aim is to determine whether invasive cardiac procedures following a 3-day (holiday) weekend have worse outcomes compared with procedures following a 2-day (normal) weekend. BACKGROUND: Catheterization laboratory schedules after 3-day holiday weekends tend to be overloaded with urgent procedures for patients who have waited up to 3 days. We hypothesized that this would be reflected by more procedural complications in patients undergoing procedures after a 3-day weekend. METHODS: Invasive cardiac procedures that occurred after a weekend at Geisinger Medical Center from July 2012 to December 2019 were included. Baseline characteristics, presentation, periprocedural variables, adverse events, and clinical outcomes were compared between catheterizations on the day following a 2-day weekend and catheterizations following a 3-day weekend. Independent correlates of adverse events were identified by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 13,704 invasive cardiac procedures performed after a weekend, of which 722 occurred after a 3-day (holiday) weekend. Baseline demographics, presentation, and case volumes were similar between the 2 groups. Procedures after a 3-day weekend were not associated with any differences in in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with those after a standard 2-day weekend. By univariate analysis, procedural complications were more frequent after a 3-day weekend (15.1% vs 12.3%; P=.03), but this difference was not significant on multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 1.22; P=.30). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac catheterization procedures performed after a 3-day weekend were not associated with differences in in-patient mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or procedural complications.
Subject(s)
Holidays , Research Design , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , HumansABSTRACT
A 66-year-old woman with a remote history of breast cancer and prior tobacco use presented to the hospital with chest pain. She was found to have an elevated troponin consistent with a diagnosis of a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). A left heart catheterisation revealed non-obstructive coronary disease, and subsequent transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiograms demonstrated vegetations on both the mitral and aortic valves. Multiple blood cultures showed no growth raising suspicion for non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE). A CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis was obtained that was consistent with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Her hospital course was complicated by recurrent embolic strokes leading to a rapid clinical deterioration. As a result, she was transitioned to comfort measures and passed away shortly thereafter. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an NSTEMI as the initial presentation of NBTE due to underlying malignancy.
