The Role of Imaging in Health Screening: Screening for Specific Conditions.

There are well-established and emerging screening examinations aimed at identifying malignant and nonmalignant conditions at early, treatable stages. The Radiology Research Alliance's "Role of Imaging in Health Screening" Task Force provides a comprehensive review of specific imaging-based screening examinations. This work reviews and serves as a reference for screening examinations for breast and colon cancer in a healthy population along with screening for lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and the use of whole body magnetic resonance imaging in at-risk individuals. American College of Radiology scoring systems, along with case-based examples, are included to illustrate the different disease entities. The future of screening is discussed, particularly in the context of artificial intelligence.

The Role of Imaging in Health Screening: Overview, Rationale of Screening, and Screening Economics.

Imaging screening examinations are growing in their indications and volume to identify conditions at an early, treatable stage. The Radiology Research Alliance's 'Role of Imaging in Health Screening' Task Force provides a review of imaging-based screening rationale, economics, and describes established guidelines by various organizations. Various imaging modalities can be employed in screening, and are often chosen based on the specific pathology and patient characteristics. Prevalent disease processes with identifiable progression patterns that benefit from early potentially curative interventions are ideal for screening. Two such examples include colonic precancerous polyp progression to adenocarcinoma in colon cancer formation and atypical ductal hyperplasia progression to ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma in breast cancer. Economic factors in imaging-based screening are reviewed, including in the context of value-based reimbursements. Global differences in screening are outlined, along with the role of various organizational guidelines, including the American Cancer Society, the US Preventive Services Task Force, and the American College of Radiology.

Lesion detection performance of an abbreviated gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol for colorectal liver metastasis surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the lesion detection performance of an abbreviated MRI (AMRI-M) protocol consisting of ultrafast SE T2W, DWI, and T1W-HBP at 20 min for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) surveillance. METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective study, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI scans of 57 patients (43 with pathologically proven CRLMs) were assessed. Two readers independently evaluated two sets of images per patient and commented on the number, location, and size of liver lesions. Set 1 included ultrafast spin-echo (SE) T2-weighted (T2W) + T1-weighted (T1W) hepatobiliary phase (HBP) at 20 min sequences + diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and set 2 consisted of the standard MRI protocol. A maximum of 10 lesions per patient were recorded. Cohen's kappa analysis, sensitivity, areas under the curve (AUCs), and the MRI cost analysis of the AMRI-M protocol were assessed. RESULTS: Between 198 and 209 lesions were assessed with each set of images. The inter-observer agreement for the abbreviated protocol was reported excellent (κ = 0.91). The sensitivity and AUCs for the lesion characterization of AMRI-M protocol were very high (over 90%) for both readers. No statistically significant differences in sensitivity (assessed by mixed-effects logistic regression) and AUCs for lesion characterization (by ROC regression) were found between both protocols. The AMRI-M acquisition time was estimated to be less than 10 min, which translated into 59% cost of standard MRI. CONCLUSION: Our proposed AMRI-M protocol (ultrafast SE T2W, DWI, and T1W-HBP at 20 min) is fast, low-cost alternative to the standard MRI protocol and has a high lesion detection performance. KEY POINTS: • Gadoxetic acid-enhanced protocol has increased the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MRI for detecting colorectal liver metastases. • Our proposed abbreviated MRI protocol is fast, low-cost alternative compared with the standard MRI protocol and has a high lesion detection performance. • Adoption of our protocol may translate to substantial savings for patients and payers.

Logistics of Three-dimensional Printing: Primer for Radiologists.

The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Task Force on three-dimensional (3D) printing presents a review of the logistic considerations for establishing a clinical service using this new technology, specifically focused on implications for radiology. Specific topics include printer selection for 3D printing, software selection, creating a 3D model for printing, providing a 3D printing service, research directions, and opportunities for radiologists to be involved in 3D printing. A thorough understanding of the technology and its capabilities is necessary as the field of 3D printing continues to grow. Radiologists are in the unique position to guide this emerging technology and its use in the clinical arena.

Clinical Applications of 3D Printing: Primer for Radiologists.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing refers to a number of manufacturing technologies that create physical models from digital information. Radiology is poised to advance the application of 3D printing in health care because our specialty has an established history of acquiring and managing the digital information needed to create such models. The 3D Printing Task Force of the Radiology Research Alliance presents a review of the clinical applications of this burgeoning technology, with a focus on the opportunities for radiology. Topics include uses for treatment planning, medical education, and procedural simulation, as well as patient education. Challenges for creating custom implantable devices including financial and regulatory processes for clinical application are reviewed. Precedent procedures that may translate to this new technology are discussed. The task force identifies research opportunities needed to document the value of 3D printing as it relates to patient care.

Role of Imaging in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Precision medicine is an emerging approach for treating medical disorders, which takes into account individual variability in genetic and environmental factors. Preventive or therapeutic interventions can then be directed to those who will benefit most from targeted interventions, thereby maximizing benefits and minimizing costs and complications. Precision medicine is gaining increasing recognition by clinicians, healthcare systems, pharmaceutical companies, patients, and the government. Imaging plays a critical role in precision medicine including screening, early diagnosis, guiding treatment, evaluating response to therapy, and assessing likelihood of disease recurrence. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Precision Imaging Task Force convened to explore the current and future role of imaging in the era of precision medicine and summarized its finding in this article. We review the increasingly important role of imaging in various oncological and non-oncological disorders. We also highlight the challenges for radiology in the era of precision medicine.

Research Challenges and Opportunities for Clinically Oriented Academic Radiology Departments.

Between 2004 and 2012, US funding for the biomedical sciences decreased to historic lows. Health-related research was crippled by receiving only 1/20th of overall federal scientific funding. Despite the current funding climate, there is increased pressure on academic radiology programs to establish productive research programs. Whereas larger programs have resources that can be utilized at their institutions, small to medium-sized programs often struggle with lack of infrastructure and support. To address these concerns, the Association of University Radiologists' Radiology Research Alliance developed a task force to explore any untapped research productivity potential in these smaller radiology departments. We conducted an online survey of faculty at smaller clinically funded programs and found that while they were interested in doing research and felt it was important to the success of the field, barriers such as lack of resources and time were proving difficult to overcome. One potential solution proposed by this task force is a collaborative structured research model in which multiple participants from multiple institutions come together in well-defined roles that allow for an equitable distribution of research tasks and pooling of resources and expertise. Under this model, smaller programs will have an opportunity to share their unique perspective on how to address research topics and make a measureable impact on the field of radiology as a whole. Through a health services focus, projects are more likely to succeed in the context of limited funding and infrastructure while simultaneously providing value to the field.