A Rare Case of CD4 Positive Cytotoxic PTCL, NOS With Leukemic Presentation.

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) is a relatively rare mature T-cell lymphoma that cannot be categorized under any of the well-defined category. This type of aggressive lymphoma mostly involves the lymph nodes, though any other organ can be affected. Leukemic presentation is extremely rare. No case report of isolated leukemic presentation was found after detail literature search. Herein we present a case of PTCL, NOS with leukemic presentation.

Liver Metastasis of Thymoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

The 2021 "World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Thoracic Tumours" classifies epithelial tumors of the thymus (thymomas) based on cytomorphology. Thymomas with benign cytomorphology are classified as type A, AB, B1, B2, and B3, while those with malignant cytomorphology are classified as thymic carcinoma. Although all thymomas have malignant potential, extra-thoracic metastasis of thymomas is exceedingly rare and the exact incidence is not known. Literature review demonstrated 39 cases of thymoma with extra-thoracic metastases reported since the publication of the 1999 WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumours. Nine of these cases presented with metastasis to the liver in the setting of concurrent metastasis to other organs, while only three cases metastasized solely to the liver. We herein report a well-documented case of type B1 thymoma with relatively limited stage (IIb) with an isolated, single liver metastasis occurring seven years after primary resection in a patient with concomitant myasthenia gravis. The following report includes a review of the literature, a discussion of thymoma classification and its relevance to prognosis, and an overview of other extra-thoracic metastatic thymoma cases.

Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on breast cancer treatment, screening, and quality of life outcomes: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: While spin - i.e., a reporting practice that embellishes positive findings and understates negative ones - is prevalent in randomized controlled trials, it has yet to be investigated in the context of systematic reviews. Owing to their significant role in clinical decision making and patient outcomes, this study seeks to identify and evaluate the severity of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews on breast cancer. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on breast cancer treatment, screening, and post-treatment quality of life between 1987 and 2020. Investigators independently screened for study selection, extracted spin data, and appraised the methodological quality of reviews using AMSTAR 2. In this cross-sectional study, 11,717 articles were identified, of which 581 met inclusion criteria. Following randomization, the first 200 were evaluated and 21 % contained evidence of at least one of nine types of spin. RESULTS: We identified spin types one, three, four, five, and six but not two, seven, eight, or nine. In particular, pharmacological (AOR 4.36, 95 % CI [1.18-16.01]) and surgical (AOR, 10.10 95 % CI [1.60-63.68]) intervention-type studies were highly associated with spin. There were no other associations between study characteristics and spin. While these results are significant, they contain a wide confidence interval and the reader should draw conclusions accordingly. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of spin in meta-analyses and systematic reviews regarding breast cancer treatment and quality of life outcomes. Accordingly, readers of systematic review abstracts related to breast cancer could be misled by distorted presentation of findings. POLICY SUMMARY: This study aims to improve the standards of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to cancer.