Comparison of Two Drainage Systems on Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common type of intracranial hemorrhage, especially among the elderly, with a recurrence rate as high as 33%. Little is known about the best type of drainage system and its relationship with recurrence. In this study, we compare the use of two drainage systems on the recurrence rate of CSDH. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 172 CSDH patients treated with bedside twist drill craniostomy (TDC) and subdural drain insertion. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (n = 123) received a pediatric size nasogastric tube [NGT]), whereas group B (n = 49) had a drain commonly used for external ventricular drainage (EVD). Various demographic and radiologic data were collected. Our main outcome was recurrence, defined as symptomatic re-accumulation of hematoma on the previously operated side within 3 months. RESULTS: In all, 212 cases of CSDH were treated in 172 patients. The majority of patients were male (78%) and had a history of previous head trauma (73%). Seventeen cases had recurrence, 11 in group A and 6 in group B. The use of antiplatelet and anticoagulation agents was associated with recurrence (p = 0.038 and 0.05, respectively). There was no difference between both groups in terms of recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-4.08; p = 0.573). CONCLUSION: CSDH is a common disease with a high rate of recurrence. Although using a drain postoperatively has shown to reduce the incidence of recurrence, little is known about the best type of drain to use. Our analysis showed no difference in the recurrence rate between using the pediatric size NGT and the EVD catheter post-TDC.

Acute Management of Pediatric Cyclic Vomiting Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize quantitative and qualitative data on pharmacologic interventions of pediatric cyclic vomiting syndrome and their effectiveness in disease management in the acute care setting. STUDY DESIGN: Using keywords, 799 studies published up from December 1954 to February 2018 were extracted from MEDLINE via Pubmed, Embase via OVID, CINAHL via EBSCO, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry. Studies were evaluated for inclusion and exclusion by 2 independent reviewers using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: The search yielded 84 studies for full review, of which 54 were included in the systematic review. Studies were subsequently separated into 1 group of 6 case series studies containing quantitative data on sumatriptan, ondansetron, phenothiazines, prokinetic agents, carbohydrate, isometheptene, and aprepitant; 1 one group consisting only of qualitative studies containing expert recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Ondansetron has the most quantitative and qualitative evidence to support its inclusion in pediatric emergency department protocols as a rescue therapy. Sumatriptan and aprepitant are potential candidates for inclusion as abortive therapies. Qualitative data from retrospective studies and case reports are not applicable to a larger patient population. This report informs a need for controlled, prospective cohort studies and randomized, controlled trials to optimize current management protocols and to develop new medical interventions.