Rates and implications for hospitalization of patients ≥65 years of age with atrial fibrillation/flutter.

The responsibility of managing atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) falls predominantly on the Medicare system. Patients with AF or AFL often have a range of cardiovascular (CV) co-morbidities and are frequently hospitalized for AF and other CV causes. The present retrospective cohort study used medical claims data to evaluate the rates of hospitalization and inpatient mortality in elderly (aged ≥65 years) patients with AF or AFL with Medicare supplemental insurance. The data were extracted from the United States Thomson Reuters MarketScan Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits Database (January 2004 to December 2007). Patients aged ≥65 years with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient nondiagnostic claims for AF or AFL and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment before their index AF or AFL diagnoses were identified. The frequencies of hospitalization and inpatient death were evaluated over the postindex study period (mean 24.3 months). Of an eligible study population of 55,774 patients with AF or AFL (mean age 77.9 years, 52.2% men), 28,939 patients (51.9%) were hospitalized (all causes) with nonfatal outcomes, 12,652 (22.7%) were rehospitalized, and 1,592 (2.9%) died in the hospital. Higher proportions of patients were hospitalized for non-CV than for CV causes (35.6% vs 27.2%). For CV hospitalizations culminating in inpatient death (n = 516), the most common admission diagnoses were major bleeding, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and congestive heart failure. In conclusion, elderly patients with AF or AFL undergo frequent hospitalization for CV and non-CV causes. Measures that lower inpatient admission rates, particularly readmission rates, may reduce the increasing cost of treating patients with AF or AFL with Medicare supplemental insurance.

Cost burden of cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality in ATHENA-like patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The ATHENA trial (A placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel arm Trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg bid for the prevention of cardiovascular Hospitalization or death from any cause in patiENts with Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter) demonstrated that dronedarone reduced the risk of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization/death by 24% (P < 0.001) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL). HYPOTHESIS: In order to estimate the cost savings associated with dronedarone use, we estimated the costs associated with CV hospitalizations and inpatient mortality in a large cohort of ATHENA-like patients. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the cost of CV hospitalization/mortality in real-world ATHENA-like patients without heart failure and with employer-sponsored Medicare supplemental insurance in the United States. Patients similar to those in ATHENA (age > or = 70 years with AF/AFL and > or = 1 stroke risk factor, without heart failure) who were hospitalized between January 2, 2005, and January 1, 2007, were identified from the MarketScan databases from Thomson Reuters. Health care costs were evaluated during the 12 months following the index hospitalization. RESULTS: The analysis included 10 200 ATHENA-like patients. Hospitalization for CV causes occurred in 53.9% of patients, with a total of 6700 CV hospitalizations for fatal/nonfatal causes. The most common nonfatal causes of CV hospitalizations were AF/other supraventricular rhythm disorders (20.2% of all CV hospitalizations), congestive heart failure (CHF; 14.3%), and transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke (10.7%). Mean costs per CV hospitalization for nonfatal causes were $10,908. Inpatient deaths from CV causes occurred in 264 (2.6%) patients; the most common causes of CV inpatient death were intracranial/gastrointestinal hemorrhage (24.2% of CV deaths), TIA/stroke (17.0%), and CHF (15.9%). Mean hospitalization costs per CV inpatient death were $18,565. CONCLUSIONS: Health care costs associated with CV hospitalizations and inpatient deaths among ATHENA-like patients in the US are high. Novel antiarrhythmic therapies such as dronedarone, with the potential to reduce CV hospitalizations/mortality in similar patients, could decrease health care costs if adopted in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of dofetilide in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: Dofetilide, an I(Kr) blocker has been demonstrated to be effective in terminating persistent atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF/AFL), and in maintaining sinus rhythm after direct current cardioversion (CV). It is not known, however, whether pharmacological conversion with dofetilide predicts maintenance of sinus rhythm. In addition, there is limited information comparing the efficacy of dofetilide in persistent versus paroxysmal AF/AFL. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients with AF/AFL (51 persistent, 29 paroxysmal) admitted for initiation of dofetilide were studied. Termination of persistent AF/AFL occurred in 61% of patients while 39% required CV. After 21 +/- 19 months of follow-up, 37% of patients with persistent AF/AFL were free of recurrence. Acute conversion with dofetilide did not predict long term efficacy. Dofetilide was more effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AFL (65%) than in those with AF (25%) (p < 0.05). Dofetilide was more likely to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with persistent than paroxysmal AF/AFL (37 vs. 14%; p < 0.05). Torsades de Pointes developed in two patients despite careful dosing and monitoring of QT changes. CONCLUSIONS: Dofetilide is more effective in patients with persistent than in those with paroxysmal AF/AFL. Importantly, short-term response does not necessarily predict long-term efficacy. Significant proarrhythmia can occur even with careful in-hospital monitoring.