Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 14(9): e29341, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36284804

ABSTRACT

Background Ventralex® ST (Bard Davol Inc, Warwick, RI) patch is a composite self-expanding and non-absorbable mesh used to reinforce ventral hernia repair. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy, post-operative clinical outcomes, the duration of operation, and complications deciding the post-operative duration/need of hospitalization in patients of small ventral hernia after their open surgical repair using Ventralex ST hernia patch. Materials and methods We included 36 patients diagnosed with a small (<2 cm defect size) ventral hernia who underwent open mesh repair following strict surgical methodology using Ventralex® ST hernia patch between September 2018 and April 2020. It was a prospective observational study. Clinically relevant characteristics, along with operative and post-operative data collected through direct interview, clinical examination, and a pretested proforma, were analyzed prospectively. Results Thirty-four patients (94.5%) were observed to have an operative time of fewer than 60 minutes, with an average duration of 30-40 minutes. Thirty-one patients (86%) were discharged within 48 hours of surgery, out of which 17 patients (47.2%) were discharged within 24 hours of surgery and 14 patients (38.8%) within 48 hours. Only five patients (13.88%) had a prolonged hospital stay for more than 48 hours due to post-operative complications. Three patients (8.33%) acquired post-surgical wound infection, whereas two (5.55%) developed seroma. Nevertheless, just one patient (2.7%) reportedly developed both infection and seroma after surgery. No cases of mesh infection or recurrences were noted. Conclusion This study demonstrates that open repair of small (<2 cm defect size) ventral hernia using the Ventralex® ST hernia patch can be an extremely safe and effective method. Furthermore, it has excellent clinical outcomes when meticulously used with an easily reproducible surgical technique, which requires less intra-operative time, has minimal post-operative complications and negligible recurrence rate, along with reduced post-op hospital stay (86% of patients being discharged within 48 hours).

2.
Cureus ; 11(8): e5364, 2019 Aug 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608199

ABSTRACT

Carpal coalitions are congenital segmentation anomalies with an abnormal union of one or more carpal bones. They can be broadly classified as osseous or non-osseous and as partial or complete. Lunotriquetral coalitions are the most common type of carpal coalition and are typically asymptomatic and detected incidentally. However, there are several case reports and small case series reporting symptomatic non-osseous lunotriquetral coalitions, which show findings on radiographs. This is a report of a case of a child with a symptomatic non-osseous lunotriquetral coalition which was undetected on initial radiographs but diagnosed on a subsequent wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

3.
Cureus ; 10(10): e3511, 2018 Oct 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30613455

ABSTRACT

The International Consensus Definition for Sepsis and Septic Shock Task Force has recently developed new methods to determine whether a patient is at risk for end organ failure after he has been suspected to have sepsis. One of the newest measures developed is a quick Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), and it is used to identify patients who are at risk of sepsis outside the intensive care unit. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score has previously been the standard for determining a patient's sepsis risk and prognosis for future mortality. With the development of these new tools, it is imperative to compare qSOFA to SIRS in order to determine which method is best and under which circumstances. We conclude that according to evidence currently available, qSOFA has limited use for patients in the intensive care unit at the time of evaluation for predicting mortality and organ dysfunction. Furthermore, qSOFA outranks SIRS for patients in the emergency department except for SIRS delivering positive results more quickly.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...