The Impact of Diabetes on Morbidity and Mortality Following Thyroidectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between diabetes and outcomes in thyroidectomy patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis used the 2015-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify thyroidectomy cases (60210, 60212, 60220, 60225, 60240, 60252, 60254, 60260, 60270, and 60271). Demographics, comorbidities, and complication incidences were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients using Pearson's chi-square test/Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The independent effect of diabetes on outcomes was analyzed using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 47,776 (95.4%) nondiabetic and 2307 (4.6%) diabetic patients undergoing thyroidectomy were identified from 2015 to 2017. Chi-square analysis demonstrated that diabetic patients had higher incidences of obesity (55.2% vs. 33.2%; p < 0.001), dyspnea (12.7% vs. 4.8%; p < 0.001), poor functional status (1.9% vs. 0.4%; p < 0.001), ventilator dependence (0.6% vs. 0.1%; p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 6.8% vs. 2.2%; p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (1.1% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001), acute renal failure (0.3% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001), hypertension (79.2% vs. 32.4%; p < 0.001), dialysis (2.0% vs. 0.4%; p < 0.001), open wound (1.1% vs. 0.1%; p < 0.001), steroid use (5.3% vs. 2.3%; p < 0.001), bleeding disorders (3.6% vs. 0.9%; p < 0.001), preoperative blood transfusions (0.2% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.001), and systemic sepsis (1.0% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.001). Demographic characteristics were significantly different between the cohorts including gender (p < 0.001), age (p < 0.001), race (p < 0.001), and Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.033). After adjusting for these factors, logistic regression analyses showed that diabetes was associated with acute renal failure (OR: 5.836; 95% CI: 1.060-32.134; p = 0.043), wound disruption (OR: 6.194; 95% CI: 1.752-21.900; p = 0.005), prolonged length of stay (OR: 1.430; 95% CI: 1.261-1.622; p < 0.001), unplanned readmission (OR: 1.380; 95% CI: 1.096-1.737; p = 0.006), superficial incisional surgical site infections (OR: 0.240; 95% CI: 0.058-0.995; p = 0.049), urinary tract infection occurrences (OR: 2.173; 95% CI: 1.186-3.980; p = 0.012), organ space surgical site infection occurrences (OR: 3.322; 95% CI: 1.016-10.864; p = 0.047), pneumonia occurrences (OR: 2.091; 95% CI: 1.125-3.884; p = 0.020), any medical complication (OR: 1.697; 95% CI: 1.246-2.313; p = 0.001), and any complication (OR: 1.495; 95% CI: 1.136-1.968; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus is a significant factor associated with increased odds of complications following thyroidectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3628-3632, 2023.

Effect of Hypoalbuminemia in Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy for Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism is parathyroidectomy. This study identifies the association between hypoalbuminemia (HA) and outcomes in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis utilized the 2006-2015 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Current Procedure Terminology codes were used to identify patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) was defined as a duration of 2 days or greater. Demographics and comorbidities were compared between HA (serum albumin <3.5 g/dL) and non-HA cohorts using chi-square analysis. The independent effect of HA on adverse outcomes was analyzed using binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 7183 cases with primary hyperparathyroidism were classified into HA (n = 381) and non-HA (n = 6802) cohorts. HA patients had increased complications, including renal insufficiency (0.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.001), sepsis (1.0% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.003), pneumonia (0.8% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.018), acute renal failure (1.0% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001), and unplanned intubation (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.004). HA patients had increased risk of death (1.6% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001), prolonged LOS (40.9% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001), and any complication (5.5% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001). Adjusted binary logistic regression indicated HA patients experienced increased odds of progressive renal insufficiency (OR 18.396, 95% CI 1.844-183.571, p = 0.013), prolonged LOS (OR 4.892; 95% CI 3.571-6.703; p < 0.001), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.472; 95% CI 1.012-6.035; p = 0.047), and unplanned readmission (OR 3.541; 95% CI 1.858-6.748; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HA may be associated with adverse complications in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2035-2039, 2023.

Preferential Use of Stainless Steel Crowns as a Strategy to Minimize Retreatment of Primary Molars under General Anesthesia.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether primary molars treated with composite resins (CRs) and stainless steel crowns (SSCs) during an oral rehabilitation under general anesthesia (GA1) required retreatment at a second oral rehabilitation under GA (GA2). Methods: Records were examined from 296 healthy patients with more than one dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia from June 2012 to January 2019. Data included treatment details and demographic information. Frequencies and means were recorded. An analysis was completed using logistic regression and chi-square for categorical variables. Results: For primary first molars, 43 percent of CRs placed at GA1 were treated with SSCs at GA2. For primary second molars, 35 percent of CRs placed at GA1 were treated with SSCs at GA2. There was no statistically significant difference in retreatment rates by molar type (P equals 0.27). Eight percent of SSCs placed on any molar at GA1 required retreatment at GA2. Conclusions: Primary molars treated with stainless steel crowns using general anesthesia had the lowest percentage of retreatment compared to those treated with composite resins. Strong consideration should be given to the placement of SSCs on primary molars in patients with early childhood caries under general anesthesia. Placement of primary molar SSCs during initial treatment under general anesthesia may reduce the need for additional treatment in the future.