ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the validity of Cervista human papillomavirus (HPV) assays in head and neck fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens from patients with head and neck squamous carcinomas and to verify that the Cervista assay in FNA specimens is a valid option for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas. METHODS: The authors retrospectively retrieved 64 head and neck FNA specimens from patients who had head and neck squamous carcinoma. The specimens were tested for HPV types 16 and 18 (HPV16/18) and for high-risk (HR) HPV DNA using the Cervista HPV16/18 and HPV HR assays, respectively. The results from those assays were compared with the results from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HPV assays in the same tissues and with the results from HPV in situ hybridization assays/p16 immunostaining in the corresponding primary tumors. RESULTS: In total, 64 FNA specimens were analyzed. The Cervista HPV16/18 and/or HPV HR assays were positive in 48 of 64 specimens (75%), and there was a predominance of HPV16 (42 of 48 specimens; 88%). In the 49 specimens that had PCR-based test results, overall agreement with Cervista assay results was 96% (47 of 49 specimens; κ = 0.883). In the 49 specimens that had PCR-based HPV16/18 genotyping results, overall agreement with the Cervista HPV16/18 results was 94% (46 of 49 specimens; κ = 0.847). In the 36 primary carcinoma specimens that had valid HPV in situ hybridization/p16 immunostaining results, overall agreement with the Cervista assay results was 92% (33 of 36 specimens; κ = 0.679). CONCLUSIONS: Cervista HPV16/18 and Cervista HPV HR testing of head and neck FNA specimens is a valid option for determining HPV16/18 status in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma.
Subject(s)
Biopsy, Fine-Needle/methods , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/virology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Proteins/analysis , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Specimen Handling , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of INFORM HPV using the SurePath collection method in women whose Pap tests indicated abnormal results. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-two women from the gynecology clinics at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center who had Pap tests and underwent follow-up biopsies were selected for the study. This included 51 women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), 23 women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 15 women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 3 women with negative Pap results. The INFORM HPV, an in situ hybridization assay, testing for oncogenic types of HPV was performed, and the results were compared with follow-up biopsies. RESULTS: The positive rate of the INFORM HPV increased with higher grades of cytology diagnoses. The sensitivity of the INFORM HPV testing for predicting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) also increased with higher grades of cytology diagnoses. A negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.9% and a specificity of 80.4% for predicting CIN 2/3 were observed in the ASCUS group. CONCLUSION: Using SurePath Pap specimens, the INFORM HPV lacks sufficient sensitivity and NPV for predicting CIN 2/3 in women with ASCUS. Therefore, use of the test as a triage tool is limited.
