ABSTRACT
The Children's Cancer Hospital of Egypt (CCHE) and the University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (SSPPS) collaborate to offer a Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) degree to international pharmacists holding a bachelor's degree in pharmacy. The experiential training is provided by CCHE's clinical pharmacist preceptors at CCHE. Clinical pharmacists at CCHE had prior experience precepting baccalaureate pharmacy students, but not Pharm.D. students when this program commenced. Therefore, the SSPPS faculty provided a live preceptor development program for select CCHE clinical pharmacists in 2017. Primary deliverables of the program included the preparation of individual preceptor development plans and experiential syllabi for program participants. Preceptor development plans and experiential syllabi were evaluated by the SSPPS faculty. Program participants were also evaluated on their assessment of learner case scenarios using introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE) and advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) assessment tools created for the CCHE program. Participant performance on submitted preceptor development plans and experiential syllabi, and performance on the learner cases were all utilized for participant selection as Pharm.D. preceptors in the CCHE Pharm.D. program. This paper describes this preceptor development program, the process utilized to determine selection of Pharm.D. preceptors, and plans for providing continuing preceptor development for preceptors at CCHE.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To develop and validate three assessment tools to measure student performance in clinical settings during required advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Methods. Each assessment tool was developed by subject-matter experts and validated using three sources of evidence. Proposed content underwent a job-task analysis by external APPE preceptors, evaluating each outcome in terms of importance and frequency of opportunity for student demonstration. After implementation, tool performance was evaluated using a measure of item applicability and student achievement. Finally, a two-step grade verification process was developed and grade acceptance by preceptor was determined. A priori benchmarks for acceptable tool performance were established for each strategy. Results. The job-task analysis was completed by 131 preceptors (52% response), with items achieving a composite score from 1.08 to11.83 (possible range: 1=most valuable, 25=least valuable). The mean item applicability ranged from 91.3% to 94.1% (n=849 student assessments) during the first year. Preceptors accepted the tool-generated grade in 798 (94%) assessments. Conclusion. Data from three evaluation strategies provide evidence of effective design and use of three unique APPE setting-specific student assessment tools. Pharmacy programs can adopt similar methodologies to develop and validate their assessment tools.
