Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 73: 98-110, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30218818

ABSTRACT

Care for patients transitioning from chronic kidney disease to kidney failure often falls short of meeting patients' needs. The PREPARE NOW study is a cluster randomized controlled trial studying the effectiveness of a pragmatic health system intervention, 'Patient Centered Kidney Transition Care,' a multi-component health system intervention designed to improve patients' preparation for kidney failure treatment. Patient-Centered Kidney Transition Care provides a suite of new electronic health information tools (including a disease registry and risk prediction tools) to help providers recognize patients in need of Kidney Transitions Care and focus their attention on patients' values and treatment preferences. Patient-Centered Kidney Transition Care also adds a 'Kidney Transitions Specialist' to the nephrology health care team to facilitate patients' self-management empowerment, shared-decision making, psychosocial support, care navigation, and health care team communication. The PREPARE NOW study is conducted among eight [8] outpatient nephrology clinics at Geisinger, a large integrated health system in rural Pennsylvania. Four randomly selected nephrology clinics employ the Patient Centered Kidney Transitions Care intervention while four clinics employ usual nephrology care. To assess intervention effectiveness, patient reported, biomedical, and health system outcomes are collected annually over a period of 36 months via telephone questionnaires and electronic health records. The PREPARE NOW Study may provide needed evidence on the effectiveness of patient-centered health system interventions to improve nephrology patients' experiences, capabilities, and clinical outcomes, and it will guide the implementation of similar interventions elsewhere. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02722382.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Patient Transfer , Patient-Centered Care , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Decision Making , Delivery of Health Care , Disease Progression , Nephrology , Patient Care Team , Patient Navigation , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Registries , Self-Management , Social Support
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 98(1): 25-33, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25807932

ABSTRACT

Hypertension in pediatric kidney transplant recipients contributes to long-term graft loss, yet treatment options--including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors--are poorly characterized in this vulnerable population. We conducted a multicenter, open-label pharmacokinetic (PK) study of daily oral lisinopril in 22 children (ages 7-17 years) with stable kidney transplant function. Standard noncompartmental PK analyses were performed at steady state. Effects on blood pressure were examined in lisinopril-naïve patients (n = 13). Oral clearance declined in proportion to underlying kidney function; however, in patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (30-59 ml/min per 1.73m(2)), exposure (standardized to 0.1 mg/kg/day dose) was within the range reported previously in children without a kidney transplant. In lisinopril-naïve patients, 85% and 77% had a ≥ 6 mmHg reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Lisinopril was well tolerated. Our study provides initial insight on lisinopril use in children with a kidney transplant, including starting dose considerations.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Kidney Transplantation , Lisinopril/pharmacology , Adolescent , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Child , Female , Humans , Lisinopril/administration & dosage , Lisinopril/adverse effects , Lisinopril/pharmacokinetics , Male
3.
Am J Transplant ; 8(11): 2378-90, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18925905

ABSTRACT

Advances in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have broadened its indications for use and resulted in more long-term HCT survivors. Some survivors develop chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the incidence and risk factors are unclear. We performed a systematic review of studies identified from databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index), conference abstracts and reference lists from selected manuscripts. From 927 manuscripts, 28 patient cohorts were identified in which 9317 adults and children underwent HCT and 7317 (79%) survived to at least 100 days, permitting inclusion of 5337 (73% of survivors) in quantitative analyses. Although definitions and measurements varied widely, approximately 16.6% of HCT patients developed CKD and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m(2)) decreased by 24.5 after 24 months. This decrease was greater amongst patients undergoing allogeneic HCT (DeltaeGFR = -40.0 versus -18.6 for autologous transplants). Several commonly reported risk factors for CKD were investigated, including acute renal failure, total body irradiation, graft versus host disease and long-term cyclosporine use. In conclusion, CKD following HCT is likely to be common; however, prospective studies with uniform definitions of CKD and risk factors are needed to confirm these findings and better define the underlying mechanisms to promote therapies that prevent this complication.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Cohort Studies , Cyclosporine/administration & dosage , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
4.
Kidney Int ; 71(5): 454-61, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17213873

ABSTRACT

The relationship between blood pressure (BP) and clinical outcomes among hemodialysis patients is complex and incompletely understood. This study sought to assess the relationship between blood pressure changes with hemodialysis and clinical outcomes during a 6-month period. This study is a secondary analysis of the Crit-Line Intradialytic Monitoring Benefit Study, a randomized trial of 443 hemodialysis subjects, designed to determine whether blood volume monitoring reduced hospitalization. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between BP changes with hemodialysis (Deltasystolic blood pressure=postdialysis-predialysis systoic BP (SBP) and the primary outcome of non-access-related hospitalization and death. Subjects whose systolic blood pressure fell with dialysis were younger, took fewer blood pressure medications, had higher serum creatinine, and higher dry weights. After controlling for baseline characteristics, lab variables, and treatment group, subjects whose SBP remained unchanged with hemodialysis (N=150, DeltaSBP -10 to 10 mm Hg) or whose SBP rose with hemodialysis (N=58, DeltaSBP > or =10 mm Hg) had a higher odds of hospitalization or death compared to subjects whose SBP fell with hemodialysis (N=230, DeltaSBP < or =-10 mm Hg) (odds ratio: 1.85, confidence interval: 1.15-2.98; and odds ratio: 2.17, confidence interval: 1.13-4.15). Subjects whose systolic blood pressure fell with hemodialysis had a significantly decreased risk of hospitalization or death at 6 months, suggesting that hemodynamic responses to dialysis are associated with short-term outcomes among a group of prevalent hemodialysis subjects. Further research should attempt to elucidate the mechanisms behind these findings.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Hospitalization , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic , Muscle Hypotonia/diagnosis , Muscle Hypotonia/etiology , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
5.
Eye (Lond) ; 20(5): 591-4, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16021189

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To establish whether the effect of improved glaucoma detection in the community suggested by an intervention study is maintained when intervention is extended to include all optometrists in the area. METHODS: Optometrists' in the Ealing, Hammersmith, and Hounslow area were invited to ongoing training sessions following completion of an intervention study. The number of optometrist initiated referrals to Ealing Hospital Eye Clinic (EHEC) for suspect glaucoma was assessed over a 12-month period. The positive predictive value (PPV) of those referrals was calculated and a historical comparison made with the results of the original study. RESULTS: A total of 376 new referrals for suspected glaucoma were assessed at EHEC during the 12-month period of data collection. This represents an increase in the number of referrals of 58% compared with an equivalent 12-month period during the initial intervention trial (376 vs. 238). The PPV was maintained at 0.45 (95% CI 0.41-0.51). CONCLUSION: The rising number of new referrals for glaucoma together with maintenance of the PPV suggests an impact on the number of new cases of glaucoma detected in the community. The increase in referral numbers was limited to glaucoma when compared with new referrals for cataract. This implies a targeted effect of the intervention in terms of glaucoma detection. We believe the next step is to perform the study in an alternative location to see if the effect is repeatable elsewhere. If proven to be the case, there is a coherent argument for widespread adoption of this strategy to improve glaucoma case finding.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services/standards , Education, Continuing/methods , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Optometry/education , England , Health Services Research/methods , Humans , Optometry/standards , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital , Predictive Value of Tests , Referral and Consultation/standards , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data
6.
Adv Perit Dial ; 17: 253-9, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11510288

ABSTRACT

Delayed use of the peritoneal catheter may be one method of reducing catheter-related complications in chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, the risks and benefits of immediate as compared with delayed use have not been examined in children. We retrospectively analyzed 33 peritoneal catheter placements in 27 children between 1997 and 2000. Eleven catheters were used for PD immediately following insertion (group I); 22 catheters were used only after a delay averaging 20 days (group D). Characteristics of the children in the two groups were similar. Catheter-related complications within the first 3 months after placement--including dialysate leak, fibrin plug, outflow obstruction, cuff extrusion, herniation, exit-site and tunnel infection, peritonitis, and catheter revision and replacement--were evaluated. Rates of individual complications in the two groups were similar, but several trends were noted. Dialysate leaks were more common in group I (rate of 0.36 in group I vs 0.09 in group D), and infectious complications were more common in group D (rate of exit-site or tunnel infection of 0.14 in group D vs 0.09 in group I; rate of peritonitis of 0.36 in group D vs 0.18 in group I). We conclude from this small study that delayed use of the peritoneal catheter does not appear to convey significant advantages over immediate use; however, immediate use may be associated with more frequent dialysate leaks. On the other hand, delayed use may be associated with a greater risk of infection. Further studies involving larger numbers of children will be necessary to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Catheters, Indwelling , Peritoneal Dialysis , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
7.
Am J Med ; 109(6): 476-80, 2000 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11042237

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although infections associated with indwelling urinary catheters are common, costly, and morbid, the use of these catheters is unnecessary in more than one-third of patients. We sought to assess whether attending physicians, medical residents, and medical students are aware if their hospitalized patients have an indwelling urinary catheter, and whether physician awareness is associated with appropriate use of these catheters. METHODS: The physicians and medical students responsible for patients admitted to the medical services at four university-affiliated hospitals were given a list of the patients on their service. For each patient, the provider was asked: "As of yesterday afternoon, did this patient have an indwelling urethral catheter?" Respondents' answers were compared with the results of examining the patient. RESULTS: Among 288 physicians and students on 56 medical teams, 256 (89%) completed the survey. Of 469 patients, 117 (25%) had an indwelling catheter. There were a total of 319 provider-patient observations among these 117 patients. Overall, providers were unaware of catheterization for 88 (28%) of the 319 provider-patient observations. Unawareness rates by level of training were 21% for students, 22% for interns, 27% for residents, and 38% for attending physicians (P = 0.06). Catheter use was inappropriate in 36 (31%) of the 117 patients with a catheter. Providers were unaware of catheter use for 44 (41%) of the 108 provider-patient observations of patients who were inappropriately catheterized. Catheterization was more likely to be appropriate if respondents were aware of the catheter (odds ratio = 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 6.7, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Physicians are commonly unaware that their patients have an indwelling urinary catheter. Inappropriate catheters are more often "forgotten" than appropriate ones. System-wide interventions aimed at discontinuing unnecessary catheterization seem warranted.


Subject(s)
Awareness , Infection Control , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Catheters, Indwelling , Clinical Competence , Female , Hospitalists/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Catheterization/methods
8.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 55(2): 465-7, 1989 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2497710

ABSTRACT

Inactivation of aflatoxin B1 was studied by using gamma radiation and hydrogen peroxide. A 100-krad dose of gamma radiation was sufficient to inactivate 50 micrograms of aflatoxin B1 in the presence of 5% hydrogen peroxide, and 400 krad was required for total degradation of 100 micrograms of aflatoxin in the same system. Degradation of aflatoxin B1 was confirmed by high-pressure liquid chromatographic and thin-layer chromatographic analysis. Ames microsomal mutagenicity test showed loss of aflatoxin activity. This method of detoxification also reduces the toxin levels effectively in artificially contaminated groundnuts.


Subject(s)
Aflatoxins/radiation effects , Hydrogen Peroxide/pharmacology , Aflatoxin B1 , Aflatoxins/antagonists & inhibitors , Aflatoxins/pharmacology , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Gamma Rays , Microsomes, Liver/metabolism , Mutagenicity Tests , Salmonella typhimurium/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...