Impaired energy expenditure despite normal cardiovascular capacity in children with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Benefit of fitness on children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is still debated. AIM: To evaluate the influence of physical activity on metabolic balance and exercise tolerance in prepubertal children affected by T1DM. METHODS: We analyzed 35 pre-/peripubertal T1DM children and 31 matched controls using an activity monitor (SenseWear Armbad) and physical activity questionnaire (PAQ) to assess energy expenditure (EE), total and active, sedentary and physical activities (h/day and Mets = metabolic equivalents). The maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was also performed. RESULTS: Total physical activities and total and active EE (>3 Mets) resulted higher in controls than in T1DM patients and self-reported perception of physical and sedentary activities was altered in T1DM children as well in controls and were different from the measured data. No differences were found in CPET parameters with the exception of a higher maximal blood pressure in T1DM children. In multivariate analysis HbA1c negatively correlated with VO(2). CONCLUSION: Prepubertal T1DM children seem to have a lower level of physical activity and EE and a probable altered feeling of physical and sedentary activities. On the other hand, T1DM children do not show any alteration of cardiovascular performance, although glycemic control (HbA1c) may play a role in cardiovascular performance.

Pre-diabetes in Italian obese children and youngsters.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Metabolic characteristics and rate of progression to overt Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in low-risk European obese children are not well documented. Aim of the study was to investigate differences in insulin sensitivity and secretion in Italian obese children and youngsters with pre-diabetes. METHODS: Ninety-six obese children and youngsters with pre-diabetes, pair-matched with individuals with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were included in the present study. Participants were screened by oral glucose tolerance. Pre-diabetes was classified as impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and combined IFG-IGT. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), 2-h insulin, insulin sensitivity index (ISI) and disposition index (DI) were calculated to estimate fasting, peripheral and whole body insulin sensitivity and capacity of pancreatic islets to compensate for lower insulin sensitivity, respectively. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare groups. RESULTS: Eleven subjects had IFG (11.5%), 79 IGT (82.3%), 6 combined IFG-IGT (6.3%). Individuals with IFG showed the highest HOMA-IR (p=0.0007), those with IGT the highest 2-h insulin (p<0.0001), those with IFG-IGT the lowest ISI (p<0.0001), with severely reduced DI (p=0.0003). Compared with NGT, DI was 60% lower in those with IFG-IGT. CONCLUSION: IFG is linked primarily to fasting insulin resistance, IGT to peripheral insulin resistance. IFG-IGT is hallmarked by reduced whole body insulin sensitivity and an additional severe defect in DI. Further longitudinal studies are needed to understand whether the different categories of pre-diabetes in European obese adolescents represent real pre-diabetic alterations.

Basal insulin supplementation in Type 1 diabetic children: a long-term comparative observational study between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and glargine insulin.

No long-term data are available on the efficacy of glargine insulin in comparison with continuous sc insulin infusion (CSII) in children and adolescents affected by Type 1 diabetes (T1D). Our aim was to compare the 2-yr efficacy of the 2 insulin approaches, in order to know how to best supply basal insulin in these patients. Thirty-six 9 to 18-yr-old consecutive children with at least 3 yr previous T1D diagnosis were enrolled. As part of routine clinical care, the patients consecutively changed their previous insulin scheme (isophane insulin at bedtime and human regular insulin at meals) and were randomly selected in order to receive either multiple daily injections (MDI) treatment with once-daily glargine and human regular insulin at meals, or CSII with aspart or lispro insulin. Both groups showed a significant decrease in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values during the 1st year of therapy, though only in the CSII treated children was the decrease also observed during the 2nd year. The overall insulin requirement significantly decreased only in the CSII group and exclusively during the 1st year, while no significant differences were observed concerning body mass index SD score, severe hypoglycemic episodes and basal insulin supplementation. The work illustrates the first long-term study comparing the efficacy of CSII to MDI using glargine as basal insulin in children. Only with CSII were better HbA1c values obtained for prolonged periods of time, so that CSII might be considered the gold standard of intensive insulin therapy also for long-term follow-ups.

A two year observational study of nicotinamide and intensive insulin therapy in patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A number of trials have evaluated residual beta-cell function in patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) treated with nicotinamide in addition to intensive insulin therapy (IIT). In most studies, only a slight decline of C-peptide secretion was observed 12 months after diagnosis; however, no data is available on C-peptide secretion and metabolic control in patients continuing nicotinamide and IIT for up to 2 years after diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 25 patients (mean age 14.7 years +/- 5 SD) with DM1 in whom nicotinamide at a dose of 25 mg/kg b. wt. was added from diagnosis (< 4 weeks) to IIT (three injections of regular insulin at meals + one NPH at bed time) and continued for up to 2 years after diagnosis. Data were also analysed from patients (n = 27) in whom IIT was introduced at diagnosis and who were similarly followed for 2 years. Baseline C-peptide as well as insulin dose and HbA1c levels were evaluated at 12 and 24 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: In the course of the follow-up, patients on nicotinamide + IIT or IIT alone did not significantly differ in terms of C-peptide secretion (values at 24 months in the two groups were 0.19 +/- 0.24 nM vs 0.19 +/- 0.13 nM, respectively). Insulin requirement (0.6 +/- 0.3 U/kg/day vs 0.7 +/- 0.2 U/kg/day at 24 months, respectively) did not differ between the two groups. However, HbA1c was significantly lower 2 years after diagnosis in patients treated with nicotinamide + IIT (6.09 +/- 0.9% vs 6.98 +/- 0.9%, respectively, p < 0.01). No adverse effects were observed in patients receiving nicotinamide for 2 years. CONCLUSION: Implementation of IIT with the addition of nicotinamide at diagnosis continued for 2 years improves metabolic control as assessed by HbA1c. In both nicotinamide and control patients, no decline in C-peptide was detected 2 years after diagnosis, indicating that IIT preserves C-peptide secretion. We conclude that nicotinamide + IIT at diagnosis of DM1 prolonged for up to 2 years can be recommended, but longer follow-up is required to determine whether nicotinamide should be continued beyond this period.