Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 110(9): 1359-66, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26303133

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has been shown to be effective in reducing cause-specific mortality. However, although it detects pre-cancerous adenomas, it is uncertain whether FOBT reduces the incidence of invasive cancer. The objective is to evaluate the impact of screening with immunochemical FOBT (FIT) on CRC incidence and mortality. METHODS: An organized screening program was implemented in 2005 in the province of Reggio Emilia (Northern Italy). The program invites the resident population aged 50-69 for FIT every 2 years. Subjects who test positive are referred for colonoscopy. Incidence was studied through cancer registry. Person-times of people aged 50-74 from 1997 to 2012 were classified for exposure to screening according to age and period. Furthermore, two open cohorts-one never screened (aged 50-69 in 1997) and one invited for screening (aged 50-69 in 2005)-were followed up for 8 years. RESULTS: A total of 171,785 people have been invited, and approximately 70% have undergone FIT at least once (272,197 tests). The rate of colonoscopy participation has been about 90%, and 2896 cancers have been recorded (1237 in the screening period). The age-adjusted and sex-adjusted incidence rate ratios as compared with pre-screening were 1.60 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43-1.79), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.94), and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.50-0.69) for the first round, subsequent rounds, and post screening, respectively. Cumulative incidence and incidence-based mortality decreased by 10% (95% CI, 3-17%) and 27% (95% CI, 15-37%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FIT screening leads to a decrease in the incidence of CRC and in its mortality.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mass Screening/methods , Program Evaluation , Registries , Aged , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors
2.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 24(3): 223-30, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25714783

ABSTRACT

This study compares the incidence and treatments of cervical neoplasia in foreigners from high migration countries and Italians in the Reggio Emilia province (Northern Italy) in 2002-2009. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and cancer were calculated for foreigners versus Italian women; foreigners were also classified according to the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in their country of origin. The proportion of hysterectomies is presented as an indicator of inappropriate surgery in CIN3 and microinvasive cancers. A higher risk was observed in women from high human papillomavirus prevalence countries (HHPVC) both for cancer and for CIN3 (SIR=4.1, 95% CI=2.2-6.9; SIR=2.0, 95% CI 1.7-2.5, respectively), whereas in those from low human papillomavirus prevalence countries (LHPVC), no difference for cancer and a lower risk for CIN3 were observed (SIR=1.0, 95% CI 0.2-2.2; SIR=0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8, respectively). A lower CIN3/cancer ratio was found in women from HHPVC (2.6) and in women from LHPVC (3.6) than in Italians (7.4). The percentage of hysterectomies for CIN3 or microinvasive cancers was 3.4 in foreigners and 4.7 in Italians. A higher risk of cervical cancer was found in women from HHPVC compared with Italians and women from LHPVC, suggesting a role of HPV prevalence in the country of origin in the excess risk. The CIN3/cancer ratio was lower for both women from HHPVC and women from LHPVC, also suggesting a role of low screening uptake for cervical cancer incidence in immigrants.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
3.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 29(6): 411-8, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24861339

ABSTRACT

Maternal diabetes preceding pregnancy may increase the risk of birth defects in the offspring, but not all studies confirm this association, which has shown considerable variation over time, and the effect of having type 1 versus type 2 diabetes is unclear. We conducted a population-based cohort study in the Northern Italy Emilia-Romagna region linking administrative databases with a Birth Defects Registry. From hospital discharge records we identified all diabetic pregnancies during 1997-2010, and a population of non-diabetic parturients matched for age, residence, year and delivery hospital. We collected available information on education, smoking and drug prescriptions, from which we inferred the type of diabetes. We found 62 malformed infants out of 2,269 births among diabetic women, and 162 out of 10,648 births among non-diabetic women. The age-standardized prevalence ratio (PR) of malformation associated with maternal pregestational diabetes was 1.79 (95 % confidence interval 1.34-2.39), a value that varied little by age. Type of diabetes strongly influenced the PR, with higher values related to type 2 diabetic women. Most major subgroups of anomalies had PRs above 1, including cardiovascular, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, and chromosomal abnormalities. There was an unusually high PR for the rare defect 'extra-ribs', but it was based on only two cases. This study indicates that maternal pregestational type 2 diabetes is associated with a higher prevalence of specific birth defects in offspring, whereas for type 1 diabetic mothers, particularly in recent years, the association was unremarkable.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Congenital Abnormalities/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Italy/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Prevalence , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
4.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 37(4): 469-73, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23683843

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In some Italian areas, colonoscopic surveillance of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is provided as a part of local population-based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening programmes. The objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility and early results of this surveillance model. METHODS: Data from district screening centres were used to evaluate the process of identification and selection of eligible FDRs (residence in the Emilia-Romagna Region, age 40-75 years, no recent colonoscopy) of screen-detected CRC patients and the detected prevalence of disease. The probability for an FDR to undergo colonoscopy and to be diagnosed with CRC and advanced adenoma was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The sex- and age-standardised ratio of detected prevalence to that expected based on results from a colonoscopy screening study of the Italian general population was estimated. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2011, 9319 FDRs of 2437 screen-detected CRC patients (3.8 per patient) were identified and contacted. Their likelihood of being eligible for, and accepting, colonoscopy was 0.11 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.12). Among the 926 subjects undergoing colonoscopy, the prevalence of previous negative screening FOBT was 63%. Eleven CRCs (1.2%) and 100 advanced adenomas (10.8%) were detected. The standardised ratio of detected prevalence to that expected was 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.19-2.66) for CRC and 1.48 (1.04-2.05) for advanced adenoma. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure of selection of FDRs was extremely ineffective. Due to previous negative screening tests, the prevalence of disease was less than expected. A population-based FOBT screening programme is a highly unsuitable setting for the provision of surveillance to FDRs of CRC patients.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Adenoma/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Family Health , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Prevalence
5.
Epidemiol Prev ; 35(2): 118-24, 2011.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21628755

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to estimate the sensitivity of the immunochemical test for faecal occult blood (FOBT) and the sensitivity of the colorectal tumour screening programme in the province of Reggio Emilia. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: retrospective cohort study, including a sample of 80,357 people of both genders, aged 50-69, who underwent FOBT, during the first round of the screening programme in the province of Reggio Emilia, from April 2005 to December 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: incidence of interval cancer. The proportional incidence method was used to estimate the sensitivity of FOBT and of the screening programme. Data were stratified according to gender, age and year of interval. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: the overall sensitivity of FOBT was 73.2% (95%IC 63.8-80.7). The sensitivity of FOBT was lower in females (70.5% vs 75.1%), higher in the 50-59 age group (78.6% vs 70.2%) and higher in the colon than rectum (75.1% vs 68.9%). The test had a significantly higher sensitivity in the 1st year of interval than in the 2nd (84.4% vs 60.5%; RR=0.39, 95%IC 0.22-0.70), a difference which was confirmed, also when data were stratified according to gender. The overall sensitivity of the programme is 70.9% (95%IC 61.5-78.5). No statistically significant differences were shown, if data were stratified according to gender, age or site. Again the sensitivity in the 1st year was significantly higher than in the 2nd year of interval (83.2% vs 57.0%; RR=0.41, 95%IC 0.24-0.69). Overall our data confirmed the findings of similar Italian studies, despite subgroup analysis showed some differences in sensitivity in our study.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Latex Fixation Tests , Mass Screening , Occult Blood , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Adenoma/epidemiology , Aged , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Italy , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Program Evaluation , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...