Correlates of adaptive behavior profiles in a large cohort of children with autism: The autism speaks Autism Treatment Network registry data.

Children with autism spectrum disorder have deficits in adaptive functioning. This study examines the adaptive behavior, its association with cognitive ability, gender, age, and symptom severity in children with autism spectrum disorder. Using data from Autism Treatment Network registry, the adaptive behavior profiles were examined in 2538 school-aged children (between 5 and 17 years, mean: 8.8 years, standard deviation: 3.0) who had an overall intelligence quotient and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale scores available. The children were grouped according to their intelligence quotient (low intelligence quotient < 70; borderline intelligence quotient = 70-85; average intelligence quotient > 85), age (5-10 and 11-17 years), and gender for the analyses. Significantly lower Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale scores were found in borderline and average intelligence quotient groups when compared to mean intelligence quotient, while an opposite pattern was seen in the low intelligence quotient group, with better adaptive behavior scores than mean intelligence quotient. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale standard scores were positively correlated with intelligence quotient and poorly associated with autism spectrum disorder severity. Younger children had significantly higher Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale scores. Adjusted comparisons by gender were not significant. Adaptive behavior profiles in the intelligence quotient categories are discussed. This study confirms a positive relationship between adaptive behavior and intellectual function in autism and indicates that children with higher intelligence quotient and older age are specifically impaired, with lower adaptive behavior, highlighting the need for assessment and targeted intervention in these groups. Future directions for research are discussed.

Long-Term Outcome of Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Bundle Branch Re-Entrant Tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the long-term outcome of patients with bundle branch re-entrant tachycardia (BBRT) who underwent catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND: BBRT is an uncommon mechanism of VT. Data on long-term outcomes of patients with BBRT treated with catheter ablation are insufficient. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2016, 32 patients had a sustained VT due to a bundle branch re-entrant mechanism. Diagnosis of BBRT was established per standard published criteria. RESULTS: The mode of presentation was syncope in 17 patients (53%) and palpitations in 15 (47%). BBRT was inducible in all subjects, and successful ablation of the right bundle branch in 19 patients (59%) or the left bundle branch in 13 patients (41%) was performed. During follow-up of 95 ± 36 months, 6 patients (19%) died, 3 of progressive heart failure and 3 of noncardiac causes. Recurrent VT due to BBRT did not occur in any patient. At baseline, 25 patients (78%) had a prolonged HV interval (>55 ms) and 7 (22%) had a normal HV interval (≤55 ms). In patients with a normal HV interval, there was only 1 death (due to malignancy), and no one developed heart block during 90 ± 36 months of follow-up. Ten patients (31%) had normal left ventricular (LV) function (LV ejection fraction ≥50%), and 22 (69%) had depressed LV function (LV ejection fraction <50%). No deaths were recorded in patients with normal LV function (5 with no implantable cardioverter-defibrillator) compared with 6 deaths among patients with depressed LV function (n = 22; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation of the bundle branch is an effective therapy for treatment of BBRT. Sustained BBRT can be seen in patients with normal LV systolic function and HV interval with excellent long-term outcomes after ablation.