Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Nursing ; 51(8): 62-66, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34347757

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of music on the physiologic and psychological stress experienced by hospital inpatients. METHODS: This pilot study monitored vital signs; utilized pain, anxiety, and agitation rating scales; and gathered verbal feedback from 50 participating inpatients at the authors' healthcare facility as they listened to music via an audiovisual interactive patient engagement technology system. RESULTS: After listening to music for 30 minutes, patients reported significantly lower pain and anxiety. CONCLUSION: Music offered a helpful tool to reduce pain and anxiety for patients in the ICU and telemetry units at the authors' healthcare facility. Future research may be geared toward incremental expansion and monitoring of this music intervention in other units.


Subject(s)
Inpatients/psychology , Music Therapy , Stress, Physiological , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Aged , Anxiety/nursing , Anxiety/prevention & control , Female , Hospital Units , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/nursing , Pain/prevention & control , Pilot Projects , Stress, Psychological/nursing , Telemetry , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 18(11): e298, 2016 11 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27836817

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research has shown patients who are more engaged in their care are likely to have better health outcomes and reduced health care costs. Health care organizations are now focusing their efforts in finding ways to improve patient engagement. At the forefront of this movement are patient engagement technology systems. In this paper, these emerging systems are described as interactive patient engagement technologies (iPET). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this descriptive study was to gain an understanding of the perceptions of nurses who are integrating these iPET systems into their daily clinical practice. METHODS: The research team interviewed 38 nurses from 2 California-based hospitals using a focused rapid ethnographic evaluation methodology to gather data. RESULTS: The study participants reported that using iPET systems may enhance clinical nursing practice. The 4 key findings of iPET were that it (1) is effective for distraction therapy, (2) has functionality that affects both patients and nurses, (3) has implications for clinical practice, and (4) may require additional training to improve usage. CONCLUSIONS: With sufficient training on the iPET system, nurses believed they could use these technologies as an enhancement to their clinical practice. Additionally, nurses perceived these systems served as distraction therapy for patients. Initial findings suggest that iPET is beneficial, but more research is required to examine the usefulness of iPET systems in the inpatient settings.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Medical Informatics/methods , Nurses/psychology , Patient Participation/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Perception , Qualitative Research
3.
J Emerg Nurs ; 39(1): 6-12, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23099018

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Clinical research in the emergency department provides supporting evidence needed for the development of practice guidelines, such as door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times for treatment of acute coronary syndromes, and is vital to improvements in patient outcomes. The purpose of this article is to describe barriers and lessons learned in launching a multisite clinical research study of symptoms of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department. METHODS: Participants included ED and research staff in 4 busy emergency departments in 3 states. At each step of the study launch, the principal investigator at the clinical site identified barriers that either were anticipated or experienced and discussed them with the site staff and study principal investigator to validate the issue as a barrier. Orientation sessions and ongoing communication between clinicians, research staff, and the research study team provided opportunity for adjustment of study protocols. RESULTS: Barriers were lack of staff engagement in research, difficulty identifying eligible patients, perception of interference in clinical care, variability in research staff education and training, patient refusals, nurses' perceptions of lack of time, undifferentiated patients, and time-sensitive quality improvement indicators necessitating acceleration in care. DISCUSSION: Important strategies to overcome barriers were developed, including identification and support of unit champions in emergency nursing and medicine; minor protocol modifications to improve enrollment goals; development of specific written expectations, roles, research protocols, and algorithms; and sharing successes among sites.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Clinical Nursing Research/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Patient Selection , Quality Improvement , Research Design
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...